Comparison of three different models to represent the wrist during wheelchair propulsion.

Due to the high incidence of secondary wrist injury among manual wheelchair users, recent emphasis has been placed on the investigation of wheelchair propulsion biomechanics. Accurate representation of wrist activity during wheelchair propulsion may help to elucidate the mechanisms contributing to the development of wrist injuries. Unfortunately, no consensual wrist biomechanical model has been established. In order to determine if different methodologies obtain similar results, this investigation created and compared three different wrist models: 1) a fixed joint center placed between the styloids (midstyloid joint center); 2) a joint center with 2 degrees of freedom computed from de Leva's joint center data; and 3) a floating joint center. Results indicate that wrist flexion and extension angles are highly consistent between models, however, radial and ulnar deviation angles vary considerably. Mean maximum right flexion angles were found to be 3.5 degrees, 2.2 degrees, and 5.0 degrees for the midstyloid, de Leva, and floating joint center models, respectively. Extension angles were 22.3 degrees, 23.6 degrees, and 23.6 degrees, respectively. Mean maximum right radial deviation angles for the midstyloid, de Leva, and floating joint center models were 26.0 degrees, 26.9 degrees, and 45.1 degrees, respectively, and ulnar deviation angles were found to be 30.5 degrees, 38.8 degrees, and 10.2 degrees, respectively. This information is useful when comparing kinematic studies and further supports the need for consensual methodology.

Glenohumeral joint kinematics and kinetics for three coordinate system representations during wheelchair propulsion.

The shoulder plays a very important role during manual wheelchair propulsion. Unfortunately, substantial numbers of manual wheelchair users eventually develop shoulder injury or pain. Recently, studies have begun to investigate the etiology of wheelchair user shoulder injuries. This study compared three coordinate systems used to represent the shoulder during wheelchair propulsion. Our results show statistically significant differences between the three shoulder representations analyzed. Differences are seen for individuals and for the subjects as a group. Based upon our results, the fixed-z model appears preferable over the other representations due to its simplicity, low hardware requirements, and the similarity of the results to the free representation. This article also provides some insight into maximal shoulder joint forces and moments recorded during manual wheelchair propulsion. Future work should include more sophisticated models of the shoulder complex.

Wheelchair pushrim kinetics: body weight and median nerve function.

OBJECTIVES: Individuals who use manual wheelchairs are at high risk for median nerve injury and subsequent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). To gain a better understanding of the mechanism behind CTS in manual wheelchair users, this study examined the relation between (1) pushrim biomechanics and function of the median nerve, (2) pushrim biomechanics and subject characteristics, and (3) median nerve function and subject characteristics. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory and an electromyography laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four randomly recruited individuals with paraplegia who use a manual wheelchair for mobility. INTERVENTION: Subjects propelled their own wheelchair on a dynamometer at 0.9m/sec and 1.8m/sec. Bilateral biomechanical data were obtained using a force- and moment-sensing pushrim and a motion analysis system. Bilateral nerve conduction studies focusing on the median nerve were also completed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pearson's correlation coefficients between subject characteristics, median nerve conduction studies, and propulsion biomechanics; a regression model of nerve conduction studies incorporating subject characteristics and pushrim biomechanics. RESULTS: Subject weight was significantly related to median nerve latency (r = .36, p = .03) and median sensory amplitude (r = -.43, p = .01). Height was also significantly related to median sensory amplitude (r = -.58, p = .01). Subject weight was significantly related to the peak resultant force applied to the pushrim (r = .59, p < .001). Height, weight, and weight-normalized pushrim forces were successfully incorporated into a linear regression model predicting median sensory amplitude (r = .63, p < .05) and mean median latency (r = .54, p < .05). CONCLUSION: This study found subject weight to be related to pushrim forces and median nerve function. Independent of subject weight, pushrim biomechanics were also related to median nerve function. Through weight loss and changes in pushrim biomechanics, it may be possible to prevent median nerve injury in manual wheelchair users.

Kinematic characterization of wheelchair propulsion.

Rehabilitation scientists and biomedical engineers have been investigating wheelchair propulsion biomechanics in order to prevent musculoskeletal injuries. Several studies have investigated wheelchair propulsion biomechanics; however, few have examined wheelchair propulsion stroke patterns. The purpose of this study was to characterize wheelchair propulsion stroke patterns by investigating joint accelerations, joint range of motions, wheelchair propulsion phases, and stroke efficiency. Seven experienced wheelchair users (5 males, 2 females) were filmed using a three-camera motion analysis system. Each subject pushed a standard wheelchair fitted with a force-sensing pushrim (SMARTWheel) at two speeds (1.3 and 2.2 m/s). The elbow angle was analyzed in the sagittal plane, while the shoulder joint was analyzed in the sagittal and frontal planes. Three distinctly different stroke patterns: semi-circular (SC), single looping-over-propulsion (SLOP), and double looping-over-propulsion (DLOP), were identified from the kinematic analysis. Through our analysis of these patterns, we hypothesized that SC was more biomechanically efficient than the other stroke patterns. Future studies using a larger number of subjects and strokes may reveal more significant distinctions in efficiency measures between stroke patterns.

Shoulder and elbow motion during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion: a description using a local coordinate system.

Individuals who propel wheelchairs have a high prevalence of upper extremity injuries. To better understand the mechanism behind these injuries this study investigates the motion of the shoulder and elbow during wheelchair propulsion. The objectives of this study are: (1) To describe the motion occurring at the shoulder and elbow in anatomical terms during wheelchair propulsion; (2) to obtain variables that characterize shoulder and elbow motion and are statistically stable; (3) to determine how these variables change with speed. The participants in the study were a convenience sample of Paralympic athletes who use manual wheelchairs for mobility and have unimpaired arm function. Each subject propelled an ultralight wheelchair on a dynamometer at 1.3 and 2.2 meters per second (m/s). Biomechanical data was obtained using a force and moment sensing pushrim and a motion analysis system. The main outcome measures investigated were: maximum and minimum angles while in contact with the pushrim, range of motion during the entire stroke and peak accelerations. All of the measures were found to be stable at both speeds (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8). The following measures were found to differ with speed (data format: measure at 1.3 m/s +/- SD; measure at 2.2 m/s +/- SD): minimum shoulder abduction angle during propulsion (24.5 degrees +/- 6.7, 21.6 degrees +/- 7.2), range of motion during the entire stroke in elbow flexion/extension (54.0 degrees +/- 9.9, 58.1 degrees +/- 10.4) and shoulder sagittal flexion/extension (74.8 degrees +/- 9.4, 82.6 degrees +/- 8.5), and peak acceleration in shoulder sagittal flexion/extension (4044 degrees/s2 +/- 946, 7146 degrees/s2 +/- 1705), abduction/adduction (2678 degrees/s2 +/- 767, 4928 degrees/s2 +/- 1311), and elbow flexion/extension (9355 degrees/s2 +/- 4120, 12889 degrees/s2 +/- 5572). This study described the motion occurring at the shoulder and elbow using a local coordinate system. Stable parameters that characterize the propulsive stroke and differed with speed were found. In the future these same parameters may provide insight into the cause and prevention of shoulder and elbow injuries in manual wheelchair.

A unified method for calculating the center of pressure during wheelchair propulsion.

The measurement of the center of pressure (COP) has been and continues to be a successful tool for gait analysis. The definition of a similar COP for wheelchair propulsion. however, is not straightforward. Previously, a COP definition similar to that used in force plate analysis had been proposed. Unfortunately, this solution has the disadvantage of requiring a separate COP definition for each plane of analysis. A definition of the generalized center of pressure (GCOP) which is consistent in all planes of analysis is derived here. This definition is based on the placement of a force-moment system, equivalent to the force-moment system at the hub, on a line in space where the moment vector (wrench moment) is parallel to the force vector. The parallel force-moment system is then intersected with three planes defined by anatomical landmarks on the hand. Data were collected using eight subjects at propulsion speeds of 1.34 m/s and 2.24 m/s (1.34 m/s only for subject 1, 0.894 m/s and 1.79 m/s for subject 8). Each subject propelled a wheelchair instrumented with a SMARTwheel. A PEAK 5 video system was used to determine the position of anatomical markers attached to each subject's upper extremity. The GCOP in the transverse plane of the wrist formed clusters for all subject's except subject 2 at 1.34 m/s. The clustering of the GCOP indicates that the line of action for the force applied by the hand is approximately perpendicular to the transverse plane through the wrist. When comparing the magnitude of the moment vector part of the wrench with the moment of the force vector of the wrench about the hub, the wrench moment is approximately an order of magnitude smaller. This indicates that the role of the wrist for wheelchair propulsion is primarily to stabilize the force applied by the arm and shoulder.

Three-dimensional pushrim forces during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion.

Upper limb pain frequently occurs in manual wheelchair users. Analyzing the pushrim forces and hub moments occurring during wheelchair propulsion is a first step in gaining insight into the cause of this pain. The objectives of this study were as follows: to describe the forces and moments occurring during wheelchair propulsion; to obtain variables that characterize pushrim forces and are statistically stable; and to determine how these variables change with speed. Convenience samples (n = 6) of paralympic athletes who use manual wheelchairs for mobility and have unimpaired arm function were tested. Each subject propelled a standard wheelchair on a dynamometer at 1.3 and 2.2 m/s. Biomechanical data were obtained using a force- and moment-sensing pushrim and a motion analysis system. A number of variables that describe the force and moment curves were evaluated for stability using Cronbach's alpha. Those measures found to be stable (alpha > 0.8) at each speed were then examined for differences associated with speed. The tangential, radial, and medial-lateral forces were found to comprise approximately 55, 35, and 10% of the resultant force, respectively. In addition to duration of stroke and propulsion, the following variables were found to be stable and to differ with speed (1.3 m/s +/- SD; 2.2 m/s +/- SD): peak force tangential to the pushrim (45.9 +/- 17.9 N; 62.1 +/- 30 N), peak moment radial to the hub (9.8 +/- 4.5 N x m 13.3 +/- 6 N x m), maximum rate of rise of the tangential force (911.7 +/- 631.7 N/sec; 1262.3 +/- 570.7 N/sec), and maximum rate of rise of the moment about the hub (161.9 +/- 78.3 N x m/s; 255.2 +/- 115.4 N x m/s). This study found stable parameters that characterize pushrim forces during wheelchair propulsion and varied with speed. Almost 50% of the forces exerted at the pushrim are not directed toward forward motion and, therefore, either apply friction to the pushrim or are wasted. Ultimately, this type of investigation may provide insight into the cause and prevention of upper limb injuries in manual wheelchair users.

Uncertainty analysis for wheelchair propulsion dynamics.

Wheelchair propulsion kinetic measurements require the use of custom pushrim force/moment measuring instruments which are not currently commercially available. With the ability to measure pushrim forces and moments has come the development of several dynamic metrics derived for analyzing key aspects of wheelchair propulsion. This paper presents several of the equations used to calculate or derive the primary variables used in the study of wheelchair propulsion biomechanics. The uncertainties for these variables were derived, and then numerically calculated for a current version of the SMARTWheel. The uncertainty results indicate that the SMARTWheel provides data which has better than 5 to 10% uncertainty, depending upon the variable concerned, at the maximum, and during most of the propulsion phase the uncertainty is considerably smaller (i.e., approximately 1%). The uncertainty analysis provides a more complete picture of the attainable accuracy of the SMARTWheel and of the degree of confidence with which the data can be recorded. The derivations and results indicate where improvements in measurement of wheelchair propulsion biomechanical variables are likely to originate. The most efficient approach is to address those variables in the design of the system which make the greatest contribution to the uncertainty. Future research will focus on the point of force application and examination of nonlinear effects.

Methods for determining three-dimensional wheelchair pushrim forces and moments: a technical note.

This technical note illustrates that some of the differences that have been reported regarding wheelchair propulsion may be due to the methods used to calculate key variables. Wheelchair ambulation is a very important form of locomotion that lacks a standard pushrim force and moment analysis system. We have developed tools for analyzing upper limb biomechanics during manual wheelchair propulsion. Among the tools is a system that allows the direct measurement of global coordinate forces F(x), F(y), F(z) and corresponding moments. The analytical techniques presented here allow calculation of radial (F(r)) and tangential (F(t)) forces, the determination of point of force application (PFA), and the moment applied by the hand (M(hz)). Our results show that the PFA can be calculated from kinetic data. Comparison of the PFA to the second metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint, calculated from kinematic data and used in previous studies, resulted in a 0.2 radian difference on average, with the PFA showing greater variation near the beginning and ending of the propulsion phase. Analysis of methods for calculating the applied tangential force showed that using the PFA provides a more accurate measurement of this force than the previous method of assuming negligible hand-moment contribution. The hand moment was compared using the calculated PFA and assuming the PFA was coincident with the second MP joint. Both methods provided similar results with a mean difference of 0.6 N x m. The methods presented in this paper provide a framework for analyzing wheelchair propulsion forces and moments.

Pushrim forces and joint kinetics during wheelchair propulsion.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate pushrim forces and joint kinetics during wheelchair propulsion and to discuss the differences between inexperienced and experienced wheelchair users. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Human engineering laboratory at a state university. SUBJECTS: Four men who use manual wheelchairs for mobility and four nondisabled men who did not have extensive experience pushing a wheelchair; all subjects were asymptomatic for upper extremity pain or injury. METHODS: Subjects pushed a commonly used wheelchair fitted with a force-sensing pushrim on a stationary wheelchair dynamometer. Video and force data were collected for 5 strokes at one speed of propulsion. Pushrim forces and net joint forces and moments were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pushrim forces, radial (Fr) and tangential (Ft), were analyzed and compared for both groups in relation to peak values and time to peak values and as ratios of overall forces generated. Net joint forces and moments were analyzed in a similar fashion. RESULTS: Pushrim forces and joint moments were similar to those previously reported, with radial forces averaging between 34 and 39N and tangential forces ranging on average between 66 and 95N. Tangential forces were higher than radial forces, and mean ratios of tangential forces to the resultant force were approximately 75%, whereas mean radial force ratios were approximately 22%. All subjects showed higher joint moments at the shoulder than at the elbow or wrist. A large component of vertical reaction force was seen at the shoulder. Significant differences (p < .05) were found between groups for peak tangential force and time to peak tangential and peak vertical forces, with wheelchair users having lower values and longer times to reach the peak values. CONCLUSIONS: Discrete variables from the force-time curves can be used to distinguish between wheelchair users and nonusers. The experienced users tended to push longer, used forces with lower peaks, and took longer time to reach peak values. This propulsive pattern may have been developed to reduce the chance of injury by minimizing the forces at the joints, as a means of maximizing efficiency or as a combination of these factors. More work investigating 3-dimensional forces and the influence of seating position and various conditions of propulsion such as speed changes, ramps, and directional changes on injury mechanisms needs to be completed.

Projection of the point of force application onto a palmar plane of the hand during wheelchair propulsion.

The objective of this study was to develop and test a method for projecting the pushrim point of force application (PFA) onto a palmar plane model of the hand. Repetitive wheelchair use often leads to hand and wrist pain or injury. The manner by which the hands grasp the pushrim and how the forces and moments applied to the pushrim are directed may contribute to the high incidence of pain and injury. The projections of the PFA onto the palmar surface model of the hand reside primarily within zone II. These results are in agreement with previous studies which have assumed the PFA to be coincident with one of the metacarpophalangeal (MP) joints. However, the results from three subjects show different PFA patterns within the palmar surface of the hand which can be related to each subject's propulsion pattern, and the PFA is not focused at a single MP joint. Projection of the world coordinates of the four hand marker system onto the palmar plane show the resolution to be within 3 mm, or one half the diameter of the passive reflective markers. The errors in the planar model assumption were greatest for the second and fifth MP markers. This was expected because as the hand grasp changes these markers do not remain coplanar. The results of this study indicate that new knowledge about how forces are applied by the hand onto the pushrim can be obtained using this method. This technical note provides insight into understanding the details within the kinetics of wheelchair propulsion and describes a technique for estimation of the PFA on the palmar surface of the hand. This technical note provides initial results from three different wheelchair users.