Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments in 1011 acutely hospitalized patients with schizophrenia: A one-year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: To compare the real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments focusing on long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications (LAIs) and antipsychotic polytherapies except polytherapy involving clozapine (APEC) for patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted over a 19-month period in 12 psychiatric emergency hospitals in Japan. Patients who were newly admitted to psychiatric emergency wards between September 2019 and March 2020 because of acute onset or exacerbation of Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, were included. All patients were followed for one-year after discharge or until March 31, 2021. The primary outcome was the risk of treatment failure defined as psychiatric rehospitalization, discontinuation of medication, death, or continuation of hospitalization for one year. Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression was used for analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1011 patients were enrolled (women, 53.7%; mean [SD] age, 47.5 [14.8] years). During follow-up, 588 patients (58.2%) experienced treatment failure including rehospitalization (513 patients), discontinuation of medication (17 patients), death (11 patients), and continuation of hospitalization for one-year (47 patients). Switching to LAIs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.810, 95%CI 0.659-0.996) and APEC (HR 0.829, 95%CI 0.695-0.990) were significantly associated with a low rate of treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to LAIs and APEC in early non-responders seems to be beneficial for the prevention of treatment failure in acutely admitted patients with schizophrenia. The risk of treatment failure was about 19% and 17% lower in patients treated with LAIs and APEC, respectively, than in patients treated without them.

Prevalence of elevated serum anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody titers in patients presenting exclusively with psychiatric symptoms: a comparative follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of patients with elevated anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antibody titers presenting exclusively with psychiatric symptoms have been reported. The aim of the present study was to clarify the prevalence of elevated serum anti-NMDA receptor antibody titers in patients with new-onset or acute exacerbations of psychiatric symptoms. In addition, the present study aimed to investigate the association between elevated anti-NMDA receptor titers and psychiatric symptoms. METHODS: The present collaborative study included 59 inpatients (23 male, 36 female) presenting with new-onset or exacerbations of schizophrenia-like symptoms at involved institutions from June 2012 to March 2014. Patient information was collected using questionnaires. Anti-NMDA receptor antibody titers were measured using NMDAR NR1 and NR2B co-transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells as an antigen (cell-based assay). Statistical analyses were performed for each questionnaire item. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 42.0 ± 13.7 years. Six cases had elevated serum anti-NMDA antibody titers (10.2 %), four cases were first onset, and two cases with disease duration >10 years presented with third and fifth recurrences. No statistically significant difference in vital signs or major symptoms was observed between antibody-positive and antibody-negative groups. However, a trend toward an increased frequency of schizophrenia-like symptoms was observed in the antibody-positive group. CONCLUSION: Serum anti-NMDA receptor antibody titers may be associated with psychiatric conditions. However, an association with specific psychiatric symptoms was not observed in the present study. Further studies are required to validate the utility of serum anti-NMDA receptor antibody titer measurements at the time of symptom onset.