Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 624: 1250-1262, 2018 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29929238

ABSTRACT

Including the temporal dimension in the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method is a very recent research subject. A complete framework including dynamic Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) and dynamic Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) was proposed with the possibility to calculate temporal deployment of climate change and ecotoxicity/toxicity indicators. However, the influence of different temporal parameters involved in the new dynamic method was not still evaluated. In the new framework, LCI and LCIA results are obtained as discrete values in function of time (vectors and matrices). The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of the temporal profile of the dynamic LCI and calculation time span (or time horizon in conventional LCA) on the final LCA results. Additionally, the influence of the time step used for the impact dynamic model resolution was analysed. The range of variation of the different time steps was from 0.5day to 1year. The graphical representation of the dynamic LCA results shown important features such as the period in time and the intensity of the worst or relevant impact values. The use of a fixed time horizon as in conventional LCA does not allow the proper consideration of essential information especially for time periods encompassing the life time of the studied system. Regarding the different time step sizes used for the dynamic LCI definition, they did not have important influence on the dynamic climate change results. At the contrary, the dynamic ecotoxicity and human toxicity impacts were strongly affected by this parameter. Similarly, the time step for impact dynamic model resolution had no influence on climate change calculation (step size up to 1year was supported), while the toxicity model resolution requires adaptive time step definition with maximum size of 0.5day.

2.
Sci Total Environ ; 599-600: 806-819, 2017 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28499229

ABSTRACT

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is the most widely used method for the environmental evaluation of an anthropogenic system and its capabilities no longer need to be proved. However, several limitations have been pointed out by LCA scholars, including the lack of a temporal dimension. The objective of this study is to develop a dynamic approach for calculating the time dependent impacts of human toxicity and ecotoxicity within LCA. A new framework is proposed, which includes dynamic inventory and dynamic impact assessment. This study focuses on the dynamic fate model for substances in the environment, combined with the USEtox® model for toxicity assessment. The method takes into account the noisy and random nature of substance emissions in function of time, as in the real world, and uses a robust solver for the dynamic fate model resolution. No characterization factors are calculated. Instead, a current toxicity is calculated as a function of time i.e. the damage produced per unit of time, together with a time dependent cumulated toxicity, i.e. the total damage produced from time zero to a given time horizon. The latter can be compared with the results obtained by the conventional USEtox® method: their results converge for a very large time horizon (theoretically at infinity). Organic substances are found to disappear relatively rapidly from the environmental compartments (in the time period in which the emissions occur) while inorganic substances (i.e. metals) tend to persist far beyond the emission period.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...