Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 55
Filter
1.
Clin Orthop Surg ; 14(1): 105-111, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35251547

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of translaminar screws may serve as a viable salvage method for complicated cases. To our understanding, the study of the feasibility of translaminar screw insertion in the actual entire subaxial cervical spine has not been carried out yet. The purpose of this study was to report the feasibility of translaminar screw insertion in the entire subaxial cervical spine. METHODS: Eighteen cadaveric spines were harvested from C3 to C7 and 1-mm computed tomography (CT) scans and three-dimensional reconstructions were created to exclude any bony anomaly. Thirty anatomically intact segments were collected (C3, 2; C4, 3; C5, 3; C6, 8; and C7, 14), and randomly arranged. Twenty-one segments were physically separated at each vertebral level (group S), while 9 segments were not separated from the vertebral column and left in situ (group N-S). CT measurement of lamina thickness was done for both group S and group N-S, and manual measurement of various length and angle was done for group S only. Using the trajectory proposed by the previous studies, translaminar screws were placed at each level. Screw diameter was the same or 0.5 mm larger than the proposed diameter based on CT measurement. Post-insertion CT was performed. Cortical breakage was checked either visually or by CT. RESULTS: When 1° and 2° screws of the same size were used, medial cortex breakage was found 13% and 33% of the time, respectively. C7 was relatively safer than the other levels. With larger-sized screws, medial cortex breakage was found in 47% and 46% of 1° and 2° screws, respectively. There were no facet injuries due to the screws in group N-S. CONCLUSIONS: Translaminar screw insertion in the subaxial cervical spine is feasible only when the lamina is thick enough to avoid any breakage that could lead to further complications. The authors do not recommend inserting translaminar screws in the subaxial cervical spine except in some salvage cases in the presence of a thick lamina.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws , Cervical Vertebrae , Cadaver , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
2.
Clin Sports Med ; 40(3): 471-490, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34051941

ABSTRACT

Repetitive stress on the lumbosacral spine during sporting activity places the athletic patient at risk of developing symptomatic pars defect. Clinical history, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging are important to distinguish spondylolysis from other causes of lower back pain. Early pars stress reaction can be identified with advanced imaging, before the development of cortical fracture or vertebral slip progression to spondylolisthesis. Conservative management is first-line for low-grade injury with surgical intervention indicated for refractory symptoms, severe spondylolisthesis, or considerable neurologic deficit. Prompt diagnosis and management of spondylolysis leads to good outcomes and return to competition for most athletes.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Spondylolisthesis/diagnosis , Spondylolisthesis/therapy , Spondylolysis/diagnosis , Spondylolysis/therapy , Athletic Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Conservative Treatment , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Low Back Pain/etiology , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Medical History Taking , Physical Examination , Return to Sport , Spondylolisthesis/diagnostic imaging , Spondylolysis/diagnostic imaging
3.
Clin Sports Med ; 40(3): xi-xii, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34051949
4.
Clin Spine Surg ; 34(7): E410-E414, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33633003

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series at a single academic medical center. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine if specific clinical, radiologic, and procedural factors are associated with conversion to surgery after fluoroscopically guided cyst rupture. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Percutaneous fluoroscopic rupture of facet cysts can often be the definitive treatment; however, it is unknown before the procedure who will ultimately proceed to formal surgical decompression. Differences in clinical, radiographic, and procedural factors of facet cysts may relate to the difference in efficacy of fluoroscopically guided cyst rupture. METHODS: A continuous cohort of 45 patients who underwent fluoroscopically guided cyst rupture was evaluated. The primary outcome measured rate of conversion to surgery and of those that underwent surgery, the rate of decompression and fusion compared with fusion alone was noted. Secondary outcomes included analysis of clinical, radiologic, and procedural variables to determine if there were risk factors associated with conversion to surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of patients eventually underwent a surgical procedure with an average interval to surgery of 95 days after attempted rupture. Thirty-eight percent of patients that underwent surgery had a decompression and fusion. Failure of percutaneous cyst rupture trended toward significance for a future surgical decompression (P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous facet cyst rupture is potentially a definitive treatment for this condition; however, it is unknown ahead of time who will proceed to definitive surgical decompression. On the basis of the data in this study, less than one-third of patients who had a fluoroscopically guided facet cyst rupture went on to surgery. There were no clinical, radiographic, or procedural details which could be used to robustly predict failure of percutaneous treatment. At this time, it is recommended to continue to attempt this nonoperative treatment intervention when there is a clinical indication after discussion of the risks and benefits with the patient.


Subject(s)
Cysts , Synovial Cyst , Zygapophyseal Joint , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 44(7): E408-E413, 2019 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30889145

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database analysis among Medicare beneficiaries OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of chronic steroid use and chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection on rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and mortality in patients 65 years of age and older who were treated with lumbar spine fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Systemic immunosuppression and infection focus elsewhere in the body are considered risk factors for SSI. Chronic steroid use and previous MRSA infection have been associated with an increased risk of SSI in some surgical procedures, but their impact on the risk of infection and mortality after lumbar fusion surgery has not been studied in detail. METHODS: The PearlDiver insurance-based database (2005-2012) was queried to identify 360,005 patients over 65 years of age who had undergone lumbar spine fusion. Of these patients, those who had been taking oral glucocorticoids chronically and those with a history of chronic MRSA infection were identified. The rates of SSI and mortality in these two cohorts were compared with an age- and risk-factor matched control cohort and odds ratio (OR) was calculated. RESULTS: Chronic oral steroid use was associated with a significantly increased risk of 1-year mortality [OR = 2.06, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13-3.78, P = 0.018] and significantly increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.33-1.92, P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.41-2.01, P < 0.001). Chronic MRSA infection was associated with a significantly increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR = 6.99, 95% CI 5.61-9.91, P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR = 24.0, 95%CI 22.20-28.46, P < 0.001) but did not significantly impact mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients over 65 years of age who are on chronic oral steroids or have a history of chronic MRSA infection are at a significantly increased risk of SSI following lumbar spine fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Mortality , Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Aged , Chronic Disease , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Medicare , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , United States
6.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 44(4): 258-262, 2019 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30015715

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis; single center data. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to look at the utility and relevance of immediate postoperative radiographs in providing vital information leading to immediate revision after spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Immediate postoperative radiographs are routinely obtained in the recovery room after spine surgery to verify the level, alignment of the spine, implant position, and the adequacy of the procedure. However, with the ability to utilize intraoperative fluoroscopy imaging for the same purpose, the requirement for immediate postoperative radiographs needs to be validated. The purpose of this study is to look at the utility and relevance of these postoperative radiographs in providing critical information that may warrant immediate intervention. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all spine surgeries (elective and emergent), performed at a single center from 2011 to 2016, was done and cases returning to operating room within 48 hours were identified. Indication of immediate revision was reviewed and utility of immediate postoperative radiographs in guiding immediate revision was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1804 elective and urgent spinal surgeries were performed by seven surgeons. Twenty-two patients returned to operating room within 48 hours of their index procedures. Of these 22 cases, only two patients were noted to have positive findings on recovery room radiographs. The findings of suboptimal spinal alignment or failed instrumentation led to the immediate revision in both cases. Both cases involved instrumentation at cervicothoracic region and intraoperative imaging provided only limited visualization. CONCLUSION: Routine recovery room radiographs played a role in the decision to emergently return to the operating room in 0.10% (2/1804) cases at our institution. The potential benefit of immediate recovery room radiographs after spine surgery should be weighed against the added healthcare cost and patient discomfort associated with obtaining these radiographs routinely. Imaging may be delayed to a more elective time without any significant risk in majority of spine cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Reoperation , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Spine/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Radiography , Recovery Room , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Young Adult
7.
Global Spine J ; 8(5): 507-511, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30258757

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Anatomic study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship of the anatomical footprint of the C1 pedicle relative to the lateral mass (LM). METHODS: Anatomic measurements were made on fresh frozen human cadaveric C1 specimens: pedicle width/height, LM width/height (minimum/maximum), LM depth, distance between LM's medial aspect and pedicle's medial border, distance between LM's lateral aspect to pedicle's lateral border, distance between pedicle's inferior aspect and LM's inferior border, distance between arch's midline and pedicle's medial border. The percentage of LM medial to the pedicle and the distance from the center of the LM to the pedicle's medial wall were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 42 LM were analyzed. The C1 pedicle's lateral aspect was nearly confluent with the LM's lateral border. Average pedicle width was 9.0 ± 1.1 mm, and average pedicle height was 5.0 ± 1.1 mm. Average LM width and depth were 17.0 ± 1.6 and 17.2 ± 1.6 mm, respectively. There was 6.9 ± 1.5 mm of bone medial to the medial C1 pedicle, which constituted 41% ± 9% of the LM's width. The distance from C1 arch's midline to the medial pedicle was 13.5 ± 2.0 mm. The LM's center was 1.6 ± 1 mm lateral to the medial pedicle wall. There was on average 3.5 ± 0.6 mm of the LM inferior to the pedicle inferior border. CONCLUSIONS: The center of the lateral mass is 1.6 ± 1 mm lateral to the medial wall of the C1 pedicle and approximately 15 mm from the midline. There is 6.9 ± 1.5 mm of bone medial to the medial C1 pedicle. Thus, the medial aspect of C1 pedicle may be used as an anatomic reference for locating the center of the C1 LM for screw fixation.

8.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 43(17): E1040-E1044, 2018 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29481378

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: To identify the incidence and analyze the risk of postoperative complications amongst elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing anterior cervical fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have reported elevated risks of postoperative complications for patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing orthopedic procedures. However, little is known about the risk of postoperative complications in rheumatoid arthritis patients after spine surgery. METHODS: A commercially available database was queried for all Medicare patients 65 years of age and older undergoing one- or two-level primary anterior cervical fusion surgeries from 2005 to 2013. Complications, hospitalization costs, and length of stay were queried. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the odds ratio for each complication adjusted for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: A total of 6067 patients with a history of rheumatoid arthritis and 113,187 controls were identified. Significantly higher incidences of major medical complications (7.5% vs. 5.9%, P < 0.001), postoperative infections (2.6% vs. 1.5%, P < 0.001), and revision surgery (1.1% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001) were observed amongst the rheumatoid arthritis cohort. Significantly greater average cost of hospitalization ($17,622 vs. $12,489, P < 0.001) and average length of stay (3.13 vs. 2.08 days, P < 0.001) were also observed. CONCLUSION: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing anterior cervical fusion face increased risks of postoperative infection and revision surgery compared to normal controls. This information is valuable for preoperative counseling and risk stratification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/surgery , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Reoperation , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Reoperation/trends , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Fusion/trends , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis
9.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 43(10): 720-731, 2018 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28885293

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, economic analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the trend in hospital charge and payment adjusted to corresponding surgeon charge and payment for cervical and lumbar fusions in a Medicare sample population from 2005 to 2014. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have reported trends and variation in hospital charges and payments for spinal fusion, but none have incorporated surgeon data in analysis. Knowledge of the fiscal relationship between hospitals and surgeons over time will be important for stakeholders as we move toward bundled payments. METHODS: A 5% Medicare sample was used to capture hospital and surgeon charges and payments related to cervical and lumbar fusion for degenerative disease between 2005 and 2014. We defined hospital charge multiplier (CM) as the ratio of hospital/surgeon charge. Similarly, the hospital/surgeon payment ratio was defined as hospital payment multiplier (PM). The year-wise and regional trend in patient profile, length of stay, discharge disposition, CM, and PM were studied for all fusion approaches separately. RESULTS: A total of 40,965 patients, stratified as 15,854 cervical and 25,111 lumbar fusions, were included. The hospital had successively higher charges and payments relative to the surgeon from 2005 to 2014 for all fusions with an inverse relation to hospital length of stay. Increasing complexity of fusion such as for anterior-posterior cervical fusion had higher hospital reimbursements per dollar earned by the surgeon. There was regional variation in how much the hospital charged and received per surgeon dollar. CONCLUSION: Hospital charge and payment relative to surgeon had an increasing trend despite a decreasing length of stay for all fusions. Although the hospital can receive higher payments for higher-risk patients, this risk is not reflected proportionally in surgeon payments. The shift toward value-based care with shared responsibility for outcomes and cost will likely rely on better aligning incentives between hospital and providers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Hospital Charges , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , Medicare/economics , Spinal Fusion/economics , Surgeons/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospital Charges/trends , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/trends , Male , Medicare/trends , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/trends , Surgeons/trends , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
10.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 43(1): 16-21, 2018 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27428388

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of complications in patients treated with one to two-level, three to seven-level, and more than eight level fusions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Elderly patients constitute a rapidly growing demographic with an increasing need for spinal procedures. Complication rates for spinal surgery in elderly patients range from 37% to 80% with major complications occurring in 12% to 21% of patients. METHODS: The PearlDiver database (2005-2012) was utilized to compare perioperative complication rates in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing posterolateral fusion of one to two (n = 90,527); three to seven (n = 23,827), and more than eight (n = 2758) thoracolumbar levels. Cohorts were matched by demographics and comorbidities. Ninety-day medical and surgical complication and mortality rates were determined. RESULTS: In the full, unmatched cohort, the major complication rate was 15.9%, with matched cohorts of one to two, three to seven, and eight-level fusions associated with major complication rates of 12.5%, 20.5%, and 35.4%, respectively. Patients treated with 8+ level fusions had 3.8 and 2.1 times greater odds of developing a major complication than patients treated with 1 to 2 and 3 to 7-level fusions, respectively (P < 0.0001). Patients treated with more than eight-level fusions had 3.9 and 10.8 times increased odds of experiencing mortality than those treated with three to seven-level and one to two-level fusions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients treated with spine fusions spanning more than eight levels experience significantly increased complication rates when compared with patients treated with fusions of shorter length. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Medicare , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/methods , United States
11.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 27(1): 68-73, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28475019

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE The authors conducted a study to compare neurological deficit rates associated with complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery when recorded in retrospective and prospective studies. Retrospective studies may underreport neurological deficits due to selection, detection, and recall biases. Prospective studies are expensive and more difficult to perform, but they likely provide more accurate estimates of new neurological deficit rates. METHODS New neurological deficits were recorded in a prospective study of complex ASD surgeries (pSR1) with a defined outcomes measure (decrement in American Spinal Injury Association lower-extremity motor score) for neurological deficits. Using identical inclusion criteria and a subset of participating surgeons, a retrospective study was created (rSR1) and neurological deficit rates were collected. Continuous variables were compared with the Student t-test, with correction for multiple comparisons. Neurological deficit rates were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel method for standardized risks. Statistical significance for the primary outcome measure was p < 0.05. RESULTS Overall, 272 patients were enrolled in pSR1 and 207 patients were enrolled in rSR1. Inclusion criteria, defining complex spinal deformities, and exclusion criteria were identical. Sagittal Cobb measurements were higher in pSR1, although sagittal alignment was similar. Preoperative neurological deficit rates were similar in the groups. Three-column osteotomies were more common in pSR1, particularly vertebral column resection. New neurological deficits were more common in pSR1 (pSR1 17.3% [95% CI 12.6-22.2] and rSR1 9.0% [95% CI 5.0-13.0]; p = 0.01). The majority of deficits in both studies were at the nerve root level, and the distribution of level of injury was similar. CONCLUSIONS New neurological deficit rates were nearly twice as high in the prospective study than the retrospective study with identical inclusion criteria. These findings validate concerns regarding retrospective cohort studies and confirm the need for and value of carefully designed prospective, observational cohort studies in ASD.


Subject(s)
Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Spinal Curvatures/epidemiology , Spinal Curvatures/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Osteotomy/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects
12.
Clin Imaging ; 44: 74-78, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28482336

ABSTRACT

Spinal subdural abscess is a rare central nervous system infection with just over a hundred cases reported. It is much less common than spinal epidural abscess. While most case reports have focused on route of infection and treatment options, there have not been any reports that focused on the unique MRI findings of spinal subdural abscess. We describe a case of spinal subdural abscess diagnosed by MRI in a 33-year-old male who presented with headaches after undergoing a microdiscectomy procedure, and review the underlying anatomic features of the spinal meninges which produce the appearance of a spinal subdural abscess.


Subject(s)
Abscess/diagnosis , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Empyema, Subdural/diagnosis , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Meninges/pathology , Spinal Cord Diseases/diagnosis , Abscess/complications , Adult , Empyema, Subdural/complications , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/etiology , Humans , Infections/complications , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Meninges/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Cord Diseases/complications
13.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 42(24): 1865-1870, 2017 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28549000

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. OBJECTIVE: To understand medical complication rates, readmission rates, costs, and discharge dispositions in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIFs) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs)/posterior lumbar interbody fusions (PLIFs) for lumbar degenerative disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Indications for ALIFs versus PLIFs can vary, though benefits of anterior approach surgery include full access to the anterior column and ability to place fusion devices. METHODS: The PearlDiver Database of Medicare records was utilized for this retrospective database review. A study group consisting solely of ALIF procedure patients was selected for. Similarly, a TLIF/PLIF group was selected for. Both groups were queried for comorbidities, 30 and 90-day complication and readmission rates. Additionally, discharge dispositions, and in-hospital/30-day/90-day Medicare reimbursements were determined. RESULTS: At both 30 and 90 days postoperatively odds of ileus, wound infection, and lower extremity deep venous thrombosis were significantly increased in the ALIF. However, unadjusted rates and adjusted odds of transfusion or dural tear were significantly decreased in the ALIF patients. Odds of 30-day readmission were 4 times higher in ALIF patients. Additionally, 30 and 90-day total costs of care in ALIF patients were significantly increased by approximately $4800 and $5800 respectively, as compared with patients undergoing TLIF/PLIF. CONCLUSION: Despite higher initial routine discharge rates, readmissions and costs of postoperative care were significantly increased in ALIF procedures. It is necessary to evaluate etiology of degenerative pathology as ALIFs are successful solutions to anterior translational instability and anterior disc slippage, but may not have the best long-term outcomes and may not be cost-effective compared with a TLIF/PLIF. In light of our data, it is important to assess the risks and benefits of the varying approaches, and the necessity to access the anterior column, when deciding on surgical technique to treat lumbar degenerative pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Ileus/etiology , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Medicare , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/economics , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , United States , Venous Thrombosis/etiology
14.
Clin Spine Surg ; 30(5): E535-E539, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28525474

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A cadaveric study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Translaminar screws were initially developed for C2 fixation. Since then, their usage has expanded to include the subaxial cervical spine, and thoracic and lumbar spine. To the best of our knowledge, special anatomy for inserting translaminar screws in the subaxial cervical spine has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To report the special anatomy for inserting translaminar screws in the subaxial cervical spine. METHODS: A total of 18 cadaveric spines were harvested from C3 to C7 and 1 mm computed tomography (CT) scans and 3D reconstructions were obtained. Bilateral translaminar screw entry points and trajectories were simulated at each level from C3 to C7 utilizing Kodak Carestream/Pacs Ver 10.2. Constructs were selected to achieve maximal bony purchase with 1 screw, designated the "primary screw." The contralateral screw, designated the "secondary screw," was selected to achieve the optimal allowable diameter possible while avoiding a simulated cortical breach, which was not always necessarily the "best purchase" diameter. Initial screw diameters selected were 3.5 mm; however, in the event that a narrower portion was encountered, then a 3.0 mm diameter screw was utilized instead. The crossing area of both screws were calculated geometrically. Maximal thickness of the lamina was considered in determining the diameter of screws. Whenever possible, 3.5 mm screws were selected in both lamina (3.5/3.5 mm); however, if a 3.5 mm screw was utilized as the primary screw, but the permissible range (P) for the secondary screw was <3.5 mm, then a hybrid construct was utilized (3.5/3.0 mm). In cases where P was <3 mm, then both screws were studied at 3 mm (3.0/3.0 mm). Screw diameters that optimized trajectory and bony purchase, while remaining within the permissible range, were analyzed, tabulated, and recorded. On CT, along the trajectory of the screws, the image was cut and measured in terms of screw length, the narrowest portion of the lamina, vertical angle, and horizontal angle in both primary and secondary screws. On the individually separated cervical spine segments in cadavers (11 of 18), we performed caliper measurements on the same portions that were measured on CT. It could not be exactly the same portions, however, due to the 3-dimensional characteristics of the specimens. RESULTS: For C3, only 1 specimen allowed 2 screws (3/3 mm), while the remaining specimens permitted a unilateral primary screw (3.5 or 3 mm) only. For C4, 37% of specimens allowed 2 screws (3.5/3 mm or 3/3 mm), but the rest allowed only a unilateral primary screw (3.5 or 3 mm). For C5, 58% allowed 2 screws (3.5/3.5, 3.5/3, or 3/3 mm). For C6, 89% of specimen allowed 2 screws (3.5/3.5, 3.5/3, or 3/3 mm). For C7, all levels allowed 2 screws (3.5/3.5, 3.5/3, 4/4, 4/3, 4.5/3, 4.5/3.5, or 4/3.5 mm). On CT, the average lengths of the 1- and 2-degree screws were 26.14 and 24.01 mm, respectively. The average vertical and horizontal angles were 22.26 and 40.66 degrees for the 1-degree screw, and 3.45 and 45.59 degrees for the 2-degree screw. On cadavers, the average lengths of the 1- and the 2-degree screws were 22.58 and 23.44 mm, respectively. The average vertical and horizontal angles were 23.67 and 54.44 degrees for the 1-degree screw, and 2.28 and 54.89 degrees for the 2-degree screw. CONCLUSIONS: This is a report of the anatomy of the lamina in the subaxial cervical spine with the special reference to translaminar screws. It was analyzed with CT and cadaveric spines along with simulated screw trajectories. For the 1-degree translaminar screw, the entry point is the distance of the diameter of desired screw superior to the inferior margin of lamina-spinous process junction. The trajectory should be targeted toward the most superomedial corner of lateral mass. For the 2-degree translaminar screw, the entry point is the distance of the diameter of desired screw below the superior margin of lamina-spinous process junction, and the target is the most superolateral corner of lateral mass, which is typically horizontal. Further studies are needed to assess the feasibility of translaminar screw insertion in the actual subaxial cervical spine.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Computer Simulation , Cadaver , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
15.
Global Spine J ; 7(1): 28-32, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28451506

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a Medicare database (2005 to 2012). OBJECTIVE: To study postoperative complication rates following thoracolumbar fusion for traumatic thoracolumbar fracture in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) compared with patients without AS. METHODS: The PearlDiver database (2005 to 2012) was queried to examine postoperative complication rates in patients with AS undergoing posterior thoracolumbar fusion for thoracolumbar fracture (n = 968). Complication rates were compared with proportion-matched controls without AS undergoing the same procedure (n = 1,979). We examined and compared the incidence of death, postoperative infection, transfusion, venous thromboembolism, respiratory failure, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, urinary tract infection, and acute renal failure in each cohort within 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients with AS had significantly higher rates of surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 2.2, p = 0.002), day-of-surgery transfusion rates (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8, p < 0.0001), respiratory failure (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5, p = 0.0006), pneumonia (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5, p = 0.0002), acute renal failure (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.3, p = 0.005), and total medical complications (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.9, p < 0.0001). Ninety-day mortality was not different between the two cohorts (p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Thoracolumbar fusion for thoracolumbar fracture in patients with AS is associated with increased rates of surgical site infection, transfusion, respiratory failure, pneumonia, and acute renal failure postoperatively compared with patients without AS. The level of evidence in this study was III.

16.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 42(9): E509-E514, 2017 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28441681

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the complication and mortality rates in patients 80 years of age and older who were treated with anterior cervical fusion surgery and to compare these rates against those of other elderly patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical spondylosis is frequently observed in the elderly and is the most common cause of myelopathy in older adults. With increasing life expectancies, a greater proportion of patients are being treated with spine surgery at a later age. Limited information is available regarding outcomes following anterior cervical fusion surgery in patients 80 years of age or older. METHODS: Medicare data from the PearlDiver Database (2005-2012) were queried for patients who underwent primary one to two-level anterior cervical spine fusion surgeries for cervical spondylosis. After excluding patients with prior spine metastasis, bone cancer, spine trauma, or spine infection, this cohort was divided into two study groups: patients 65 to 79 (51,808) and ≥80 years old (5515) were selected. A cohort of matched control patients was selected from the 65 to 79-year-old and 90-day complication rates and 90-day and 1-year mortality rates were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: The proportion of patients experiencing at least one major medical complication was relatively increased by 53.4% in patients aged ≥80 years [odds ratio (OR) 1.63]. Patients 80 years of age or older were more likely to experience dysphagia (OR 2.16), reintubation (OR 2.34), and aspiration pneumonitis (OR 3.17). Both 90-day (OR: 4.34) and 1-year (OR 3.68) mortality were significantly higher in the ≥80 year cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients 80 years of age or older are more likely to experience a major medical complication or mortality following anterior cervical fusion for cervical spondylosis than patients 65 to 79 years old. Dysphagia, aspiration pneumonitis, and reintubation rates are also significantly higher in patients 80 years of age or older. Although complication rates may be higher in this patient population, carefully selected patients could potentially derive much benefit from surgery and should not be screened out solely on the basis of age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data , Spondylosis/epidemiology , Spondylosis/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
17.
Spine J ; 17(8): 1100-1105, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28343046

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although multiple studies have cited that diabetes mellitus as a risk factor decreased functional outcomes, increased infectious complications, and overall increased reoperation rate following degenerative lumbar spinal surgery, few have investigated how perioperative glycemic control influences such complications. PURPOSE: The primary goal of the present study was to use a national database to evaluate the association of perioperative glycemic control as demonstrated by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in patients with diabetes undergoing primary, single-level decompression without concomitant fusion with the incidence of deep postoperative infection requiring operative irrigation and debridement. Our secondary objective was to calculate a threshold level of HbA1c above which the risk of postoperative infection after lumbar decompression increases significantly in patients with diabetes. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a retrospective case control database study, with Level III evidence. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study comprised private-payer patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing single-level lumbar decompression with an HbA1c laboratory value recorded in the database within 3 months of surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome examined in this study was deep infection following primary, single-level lumbar decompression requiring surgical intervention. Postoperative infection within 1 year of the index primary, single-level lumbar decompression was assessed using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) procedure codes and the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) diagnostic codes. METHODS: The Humana private-payer dataset from the PearlDiver database was used for this study. The database was queried for patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing primary, single-level lumbar decompression surgery using CPT codes. Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus who had an HbA1c level drawn within 3 months before or after their surgical date were then selected to form the study group using the ICD-9 diagnostic codes. Patients were then divided into groups based on their HbA1c level by increments of 0.5 mg/dL. The incidence of deep infection requiring operative intervention within 1 year for each HbA1c group was then identified using CPT and ICD-9 codes. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed to determine an optimal threshold value of the HbA1c above which the risk of postoperativeinfection was significantly increased. The threshold value was tested using a multivariable binomial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5,194 patients who underwent primary, single-level lumbar decompression with diabetes and a perioperative HbA1c recorded within 3 months of surgery were included in the study. The rate of infection ranged from a low of 0.5% up to 3.5% for patients with an HbA1c level >11.0 mg/dL (p=.012). The inflection point of the ROC curve corresponded to an HbA1c level above 7.5 mg/dL (p=.01, AUC=0.71, specificity=70%, sensitivity=53%). After controlling for patient demographics and medical comorbidities, patients with an HbA1c level of 7.5 mg/dL or above had a significantly higher risk for deep infection compared with patients below this threshold (odds ratio: 2.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.8-4.9, p<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of deep postoperative infection requiring surgical intervention following single-level lumbar decompression in patients with diabetes mellitus increases as the perioperative HbA1c increases. The ROC and multivariable regression analyses determined that a perioperative HbA1c above 7.5 mg/dL could serve as a threshold for a significantly increased risk of deep postoperative infection following lumbar decompression.


Subject(s)
Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Lumbosacral Region/surgery , Wound Infection/epidemiology , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Wound Infection/blood
18.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 26(5): 645-649, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28291411

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE Lumbar epidural steroid injections (LESIs) are performed for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes for a variety of indications, including low-back pain, the leading cause of disability and expense due to work-related conditions in the US. The steroid agent used in epidural injections is reported to relieve nerve root inflammation, local ischemia, and resultant pain, but the injection may also have an adverse impact on spinal surgery performed thereafter. In particular, the possibility that preoperative epidural injections may increase the risk of surgical site infection after lumbar spinal fusion has been reported but has not been studied in detail. The goal of the present study was to use a large national insurance database to analyze the association of preoperative LESIs with surgical site infection after lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS A nationwide insurance database of patient records was used for this retrospective analysis. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to query the database for patients who had undergone LESI and 1- or 2-level lumbar posterior spinal fusion procedures. The rate of postoperative infection after 1- or 2-level posterior spinal fusion was analyzed. These study patients were then divided into 3 separate cohorts: 1) lumbar spinal fusion performed within 1 month after LESI, 2) fusion performed between 1 and 3 months after LESI, and 3) fusion performed between 3 and 6 months after LESI. The study patients were compared with a control cohort of patients who underwent lumbar fusion without previous LESI. RESULTS The overall 3-month infection rate after lumbar spinal fusion procedure was 1.6% (1411 of 88,540 patients). The infection risk increased in patients who received LESI within 1 month (OR 2.6, p < 0.0001) or 1-3 months (OR 1.4, p = 0.0002) prior to surgery compared with controls. The infection risk was not significantly different from controls in patients who underwent lumbar fusion more than 3 months after LESI. CONCLUSIONS Lumbar spinal fusion performed within 3 months after LESI may be associated with an increased rate of postoperative infection. This association was not found when lumbar fusion was performed more than 3 months after LESI.


Subject(s)
Injections, Epidural/adverse effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Preoperative Care/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion , Steroids/administration & dosage , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Medicare , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Time Factors , United States
19.
World Neurosurg ; 102: 13-17, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28279772

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of perioperative hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level in patients with diabetes with the incidence of infection after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion requiring operative intervention, in addition to determining if a threshold level of HbA1c above which the risk of infection increases significantly exists. METHODS: A national administrative database was queried for patients who underwent primary anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with diabetes who had a perioperative HbA1c level recorded within 3 months of surgery. These patients were stratified based on their HbA1c level in 0.5-mg/dL increments from <5.49 mg/dL to >11.5 mg/dL. The incidence of infection requiring operative intervention within 1 year was then identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine a threshold value of the HbA1c level. RESULTS: A total of 3341 patients with a perioperative HbA1c level were included. The rate of deep infection requiring irrigation and debridement postoperatively stratified by HbA1c level ranged from a low of 1.5% to a high of 6.4% and was significantly correlated with increasing HbA1c levels (P = 0.005). The results of ROC analysis determined that the inflection point of the ROC curve corresponded to an HbA1c level higher than 7.5 mg/dL (P = 0.022; area under the curve, 0.67; specificity, 68%; sensitivity, 46%). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of deep postoperative infection in patients with diabetes mellitus increases as the perioperative HbA1c level increases. ROC analysis determined that a perioperative HbA1c level higher than 7.5 mg/dL could serve as a threshold for a significantly increased risk of infection.


Subject(s)
Diskectomy/adverse effects , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Blood Glucose , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/surgery , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , ROC Curve , Regression Analysis , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , United States
20.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 42(2): 71-77, 2017 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28072635

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether any association exists between preoperative cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs) at various time intervals before anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical fusion (PCF) and the incidence of postoperative infection. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although infectious complications following CESI are uncommon, the association between preoperative CESI and postoperative infection following ACDF or PCF has yet to be evaluated in the current literature. METHODS: A national insurance database was utilized to compare postoperative infection rates within 90 days in patients who received a CESI before ACDF or PCF. Three cohorts were created for each procedure: PCF (n = 402) or ACDF (n = 4354) within 3 months, PCF (n = 586) or ACDF (n = 5183) between 3 and 6 months, and PCF (n = 629) or ACDF (3648) between 6 and 12 months following a CESI. These cohorts were compared with control cohorts who underwent PCF (n = 61,253) or ACDF (n = 241,678) without prior CESI. Postoperative infection rates within 90 days were assessed using International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision (ICD-9) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and P values were then calculated using SPSS. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent effect of preoperative injection on postoperative infection following ACDF or PCF controlling for known risk factors for infection, including age, gender, obesity, diabetes, and smoking. RESULTS: Patients who underwent CESI within 3 months (OR 2.21, P < 0.0001) and within 3 to 6 months (OR 1.95, P = 0.0002) before PCF had significantly increased odds of developing a postoperative infection. Patients who underwent CESI within 3 months (OR 1.83, P < 0.0001) before ACDF had significantly increased odds of developing a postoperative infection. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that cervical ESI within 6 months of PCF, and within 3 months of ACDF, is independently associated with significantly increased rates of postoperative infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Injections, Spinal/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Radiculopathy/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...