Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 54
Filter
1.
Target Oncol ; 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of glucocorticoid administration for adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs, on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the prognostic impact of glucocorticoid use for AEs during first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from 194 patients who received dual ICI combination therapy [i.e., immunotherapy (IO)-IO] or combinations of ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the history of glucocorticoid administration in each treatment group. Survival based on glucocorticoid administration was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 101 (52.0%) and 93 (48.0%) patients received IO-IO and IO-TKI combination therapy, respectively. Glucocorticoids were administered to 46 (46%) and 22 (24%) patients in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, respectively. In the IO-IO group, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in patients with glucocorticoid administration than in those without administration (median PFS: 14.4 versus 3.45 months, p = 0.0005; median OS: 77.6 versus 33.9 months, p = 0.0025). Multivariable analysis showed that glucocorticoid administration was an independent predictor of longer PFS (hazard ratio: 0.43, p = 0.0005) and OS (hazard ratio: 0.35, p = 0.0067) after adjustment for covariates. In the IO-TKI group, neither PFS nor OS significantly differed between patients treated with and without glucocorticoid administration (PFS: p = 0.0872, OS: p = 0.216). CONCLUSIONS: Glucocorticoid administration did not negatively impact the effectiveness of ICI combination therapy for RCC, prompting glucocorticoid treatment use when AEs develop.

2.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 29(4): 473-480, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are few comparative studies on dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (i.e., IO-IO) and combination therapies comprising ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (i.e., IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially in real-world settings. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data of 175 patients with IMDC intermediate-risk or poor-risk RCC; as first-line therapy, 103 received IO-IO, and 72 received IO-TKI. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to balance patients' backgrounds in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups. RESULTS: Based on the IPTW analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (median: 15.6 vs. 8.3 months; p = 0.0386). In contrast, overall survival was not different between groups (median: 46.7 vs. 49.0 months; p = 0.465). Although the IPTW-adjusted objective response rate was not significantly different (51.2% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.359), the progressive disease rate as the best overall response was lower in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (3.3% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.0001). Regarding the safety profile, the treatment interruption rate was higher in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (70.3% vs. 49.2%; p = 0.005). In contrast, the IO-IO group had a higher corticosteroid administration rate (43.3% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: IO-TKI therapy exhibited superior effectiveness over IO-IO therapy in terms of PFS improvement and immediate disease progression prevention and was associated with a higher risk of treatment interruption and a lower risk of needing corticosteroids.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
3.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(2): 549-557.e5, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether kidney function affects outcomes following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data of 167 patients with advanced RCC, including 98 who received ICI dual combination therapy (ie, immunotherapy [IO]-IO) and 69 who received ICI combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (ie, IO-TKI). In each regimen, treatment profiles were assessed according to the grade of chronic kidney disease (CKD) as defined by the KDIGO 2012 criteria. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients who received IO-IO, 31 (32%), 30 (31%), 15 (15%), and 22 (22%) had CKD G1/2, G3a, G3b, and G4/5, respectively. Of the 69 patients who received IO-TKI, 18 (26%), 25 (36%), and 26 (38%) had G1/2, G3a, and G3b/4/5, respectively. Regarding efficacy, progression-free survival, overall survival, or objective response rate was not different according to the CKD grade in both treatment groups (P > .05). Regarding safety, the rate of adverse events, treatment interruption, or corticosteroid administration was not different according to the CKD grade in the IO-IO group (P > .05), whereas in the IO-TKI group, the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events were significantly higher (P = .0292), and the rates of ICI interruption (P = .0353) and corticosteroid administration (P = .0685) increased, according to the CKD grade. CONCLUSION: There is a differential safety but comparable efficacy profile between the IO-IO and IO-TKI regimens in patients with CKD. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Kidney
4.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 54(5): 577-583, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38251783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up data regarding treatment outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma as a first-line therapy are limited in real-world Japanese populations. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data of 56 advanced renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with a follow-up of at least 3 years. Survival, tumour response and adverse event profiles were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (73%) were histopathologically diagnosed with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, and 34 (61%) were categorized into the International Metastatic renal cell carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate-risk group. The median follow-up period was 34.4 months. Regarding an effectiveness profile, median progression-free survival, time to treatment failure and overall survival were 9.01, 12.5 and 49.0 months, respectively. Objective response was observed in 27 patients (48%), including eight patients with complete response (14%), and the median duration of response was 30.8 months. Multivariate analyses showed that clear-cell histology was an independent factor of longer overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.23, P = 0.0013). Regarding safety profiles, adverse events of any grade and those with grade ≥3 developed in 40 (71%) and 25 patients (45%), respectively. Median time to adverse event development was 1.68 months. Treatment was interrupted in 28 patients (50%), and corticosteroid administration was needed in 25 (45%). CONCLUSION: The 3-year follow-up data showed that nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy exhibited a feasible effectiveness in real-world Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Accordingly, the high risk of adverse event development, which often requires treatment withdrawal and corticosteroid administration, should be considered.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Ipilimumab , Kidney Neoplasms , Nivolumab , Humans , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Ipilimumab/administration & dosage , Male , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Follow-Up Studies , Japan , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , East Asian People
5.
In Vivo ; 38(1): 272-280, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38148086

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Disasters can jeopardize breast cancer care and Japan's triple disaster in 2011 (earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear accident) is no exception. However, detailed information is lacking regarding the care of breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) following the disaster. We aimed to explore the process by which local patients become aware of BCRL, the problems faced, and the support they require. We also aimed to clarify the effects of the 2011 disaster on experiences related to lymphedema in the target population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who developed BCRL after breast cancer treatment were recruited from Iwaki city, a municipality located in the southern coastal region of Fukushima (N=16). In-depth, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted, and the obtained data were appraised using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Five themes related to BCRL were identified: 1) the process of becoming aware of BCRL, 2) troubles or worries/concerns due to BCRL, 3) information sources regarding BCRL management, 4) strategies to cope with BCRL, and 5) the adverse impacts of the 2011 disaster on BCRL management. CONCLUSION: Except for the disaster context, the themes are in line with those of previous studies conducted in the non-disaster context. Nonetheless, there were limited but non-negligible adverse effects of the 2011 disaster on long-term local BCRL management. The findings of this study demonstrate the necessity for individualizing coping strategies against BCRL among healthcare professionals in the Fukushima coastal area and beyond.


Subject(s)
Breast Cancer Lymphedema , Breast Neoplasms , Disasters , Fukushima Nuclear Accident , Lymphedema , Humans , Female , Breast Cancer Lymphedema/epidemiology , Breast Cancer Lymphedema/etiology , Breast Cancer Lymphedema/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Japan/epidemiology
6.
Rural Remote Health ; 23(4): 8496, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37933099

ABSTRACT

In breast cancer surgery, some medical facilities lack the necessary resources to conduct sentinel lymph node biopsy and its intraoperative frozen section consultation. In the coastal rural area of Fukushima, Japan, which has suffered from physician undersupply following the 2011 triple disaster of earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster, we explored the feasibility of telepathology by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy in remote intraoperative frozen section consultation of sentinel lymph node biopsy and its required time. Although examination time has room for improvement, telepathology can be one possible solution in resource-limited areas.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Disasters , Fukushima Nuclear Accident , Remote Consultation , Telepathology , Humans , Female , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Frozen Sections , Japan
7.
Clin Case Rep ; 11(9): e7919, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37720707

ABSTRACT

Key Clinical Message: During disasters, multiple factors can cause significant delays in medical visits. Regular patient monitoring, high-risk individual alerts, and telemedicine enhancements can potentially alleviate these issues and ensure timely interventions. Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a Japanese woman in her 70s delayed her regular breast cancer checkup for over 2 years. During disasters, health priorities tend to decline, necessitating proactive measures from healthcare providers, such as augmenting collaboration among healthcare professionals and identifying high-risk individuals.

8.
J Endourol ; 37(9): 1043-1048, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37427433

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a valid and safe procedure for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. This study aimed to examine the perioperative outcomes of HoLEP using a new laser platform, Lumenis Pulse™ 120H, and a previous laser platform, VersaPulse Select 80W. Methods: A total of 612 patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation were enrolled, including 188 and 424 patients who underwent enucleation using Lumenis Pulse 120H and VersaPulse Select 80W, respectively. They were matched using propensity scores with preoperative patient characteristics, and the differences between the two groups, including operative time, enucleated specimen, transfusion rate, and complication rate, were examined. Results: Propensity score-matched cohort comprised 364 patients with 182 in the Lumenis Pulse 120H group (50.0%) and 182 in the VersaPulse Select 80W group (50.0%). Operative time was significantly shorter with Lumenis Pulse 120H (55.2 ± 34.4 vs 101.4 ± 54.3 minutes, p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant differences were seen in resected specimen weight (43.8 ± 29.8 vs 39.6 ± 22.6 g, p = 0.36), rate of incidental prostate cancer (7.7% vs 10.4%, p = 0.36), transfusion rate (0.6% vs 1.1%, p = 0.56), and perioperative complication rates, including urinary tract infection, hematuria, urinary retention, and capsular perforation (5.0% vs 5.0%, 4.4% vs 2.7%, 0.5% vs 4.4%, 0.5% vs 0%, respectively, p = 0.13). Conclusions: Lumenis Pulse 120H improved the operative time significantly, which is regarded as one of the disadvantages of HoLEP.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Lasers, Solid-State , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Male , Humans , Prostate/surgery , Propensity Score , Treatment Outcome , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/methods , Laser Therapy/methods , Holmium , Retrospective Studies
9.
BJUI Compass ; 4(4): 417-419, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37334029

ABSTRACT

Overactive bladder (OAB) significantly reduces quality of life. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether the gender combination of patient and physician may be associated with satisfaction with OAB treatment. This questionnaire survey was conducted at Jyoban Hospital. We considered the adult patients aged 18 years or older who attended the outpatient office of the urology department of the hospital, were diagnosed with OAB and had been taking anticholinergics or ß3-receptor stimulants, or both, for at least 3 months. In addition to the OAB treatment satisfaction, the questionnaire covered OABSS, IPSS, oral medications, effectiveness of OAB treatment, response to OAB symptoms, and the medium and extent of information collection. A total of 147 patients participated in the study. In summary, 91 (61.9%) were male, and the mean age was 73.5 years. Compared to when the gender of doctor and patient was not the same, female patients tended to be significantly more satisfied when they were treated by female doctors (OR 10.79, 95% CI 1.27-92.05). On the other hand, no similar trend was observed when male patients were treated by male doctors (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.25-6.34). In the present study, which examined doctor-patient gender combinations in satisfaction with OAB treatment, as hypothesized, satisfaction was higher for female doctor-female patient combinations compared to different doctor-patient genders. A notable fact was that similar associations were not observed among the male doctor-patient combination. This means that an embarrassment of female patients could be stronger than male patients particularly in disclosing urinary symptoms to healthcare providers. The percentage of female urologists in Japan is only 8.2%, and it will be necessary to further promote the recruitment of female doctors in urology fields in order to encourage female patients with OAB to more actively visit doctors.

10.
Int J Urol ; 30(10): 889-895, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37345368

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Data available on the effect of the recently developed Hood technique and its modified iterations in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on postoperative urinary continence are insufficient. We evaluated the time to achieve urinary continence with the modified Hood technique compared with the standard or umbilical ligament preservation robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHODS: This retrospective analysis examines patient records for those who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at the Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation in Fukushima, Japan, from 2017 to 2021. The main outcome was to determine significant differences in the time taken to achieve urinary continence among the three procedure types. We employed the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to estimate the time to achieve urinary continence in the three procedure types of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Additionally, we used a Cox regression hazard model to evaluate the association between the time to achieve urinary continence and the procedure types. RESULTS: We considered 196 patients in this study. The estimated rates of achieving urinary continence at 6 months following standard, umbilical ligament preservation, and modified Hood technique robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were 77.6%, 89.5%, and 100%, respectively. The multivariable Cox hazard regression model showed that patients who underwent the modified Hood technique were significantly more likely to achieve urinary continence than those who underwent the standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Hood technique achieved better urinary continence outcomes, with all patients with the procedure achieving urinary continence at 6 months. Further randomized controlled trials are required to validate this finding.


Subject(s)
Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Urinary Incontinence , Male , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Urinary Incontinence/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Robot Surg ; 17(5): 2125-2133, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37247118

ABSTRACT

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with previous holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is challenging, and few studies have analyzed its perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes. Here we retrospectively evaluated 298 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies, including 25 with and 273 without previous holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, performed in 2015-2022. Regarding perioperative outcomes, operative and console times were significantly longer in the previous holmium laser enucleation of the prostate group. In contrast, the estimated blood loss was similar between groups, and there were no transfusions or intraoperative complications. Multivariable Cox hazard regression analysis of the functional outcomes of postoperative urinary continence showed that body mass index, intraoperative bladder neck repair, and nerve sparing were independently associated factors, whereas a history of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was not. Similarly, a history of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was not associated with biochemical recurrence; however, positive surgical margins and seminal vesicle invasion were independent risk factors of biochemical recurrence. Our findings revealed that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was safe and raised no concerns of postoperative urinary incontinence or biochemical recurrence. Therefore, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy may be a treatment option for patients with prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Lasers, Solid-State , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Prostatic Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Male , Humans , Seminal Vesicles , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Treatment Outcome
12.
Target Oncol ; 18(2): 209-220, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36941516

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated the superior efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy over sunitinib, a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, such benefits have not been elucidated in populations outside of clinical trials. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from 467 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received ICI-based combination therapy or TKIs, as first-line therapy. Clinical outcome was compared between ICI-based combination therapy and TKIs in each population divided according to trial eligibility. RESULTS: Among 152 patients treated with ICI-based combination therapy and 315 patients treated with TKIs, 76 (50.0%) and 156 (49.5%) were trial ineligible, respectively. Overall survival (p = 0.0072) and objective response rate (p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in ICI-based combination therapy than in TKIs, but progression-free survival was comparable (p = 0.681). In the trial-eligible population, overall survival was longer (p = 0.0906) and the objective response rate was significantly higher (p = 0.0124) in ICI-based combination therapy than in TKIs. In the trial-ineligible population, overall survival (p = 0.0208) and objective response rate (p = 0.0006) were significantly higher with ICI-based combination therapy than with TKIs. A multivariate analysis also showed that ICI-based combination therapy was independently associated with prolonged overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.47; p = 0.0016). Regardless of trial eligibility, progression-free survival did not differ between ICI-based combination therapy and TKIs (trial eligible: p = 0.287; trial ineligible: p = 0.0708). CONCLUSIONS: The present study, using real-world data, provides evidence indicating the therapeutic benefit of ICI-based combination therapy over TKIs for advanced renal cell carcinoma was more statistically significant in the trial-ineligible population than in the trial-eligible population.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology
13.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 53(7): 611-618, 2023 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37002188

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prognostic impact of sex in patients with malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors has been intensively discussed but remains unclear, especially in advanced renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a total of 184 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with either nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined treatment as first-line therapy (n = 73) or nivolumab as later-line therapy (n = 111) at our affiliated institutions. Progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate as well as adverse event profile were compared between sexes. RESULTS: Of the total 184 patients, 48 (26%) were female. Female patients had a significantly shorter progression-free survival than male patients (median: 3.8 vs. 8.3 months, P = 0.0005), but overall survival (median: 39.2 vs. 45.1 months, P = 0.283) and objective response rate (29% vs. 42%, P = 0.119) were not different between them. Similar findings were observed when analyzing within each treatment; in both patient groups treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined therapy and nivolumab monotherapy, progression-free survival was significantly shorter in female than in male patients (P = 0.007, P = 0.017), but overall survival (P = 0.914, P = 0.117) and objective response rate (P = 0.109, P = 0.465) were comparable between them. Moreover, in a more restricted cohort consisting of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, a shorter progression-free survival in female patients was also observed (3.8 vs. 11.0 months, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study showed that immune checkpoint inhibitors-based treatment for renal cell carcinoma exhibited less marked effects in female than in male patients. Thus, sex may be an important factor for decision-making on systemic therapy as renal cell carcinoma treatment, although further studies are required to validate the present findings.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Ipilimumab/adverse effects , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36901096

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Post-operative urinary incontinence (PUI) after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is an important complication; PUI occurs immediately after postoperative urethral catheter removal, and, although approximately 90% of patients improve within one year after surgery, it can significantly worsen their quality of life. However, information is lacking on its nature in community hospital settings, particularly in Asian countries. The purposes of this study were to investigate the time required to recover from PUI after RARP and to identify its associated factors in a Japanese community hospital. METHODS: Data were extracted from the medical records of 214 men with prostate cancer who underwent RARP from 2019 to 2021. We then calculated the number of days elapsed from the surgery to the initial outpatient visit confirming PUI recovery among the patients. We estimated the PUI recovery rate using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and evaluated associated factors using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The PUI recovery rates were 5.7%, 23.4%, 64.6%, and 93.3% at 30, 90, 180, and 365 days following RARP, respectively. After an adjustment, those with preoperative urinary incontinence experienced significantly slower PUI recovery than their counterparts, while those with bilateral nerve sparing experienced recovery significantly sooner than those with no nerve sparing. CONCLUSION: Most PUI improved within one year, but a proportion of those experiencing recovery before 90 days was smaller than previously reported.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Urinary Incontinence , Male , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , East Asian People , Hospitals, Community , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery
15.
Target Oncol ; 18(1): 159-168, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36571708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma remains unclear, especially in terms of differences between regimens. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor dual combination therapy (IO-IO) or immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor combination therapy (IO-TKI). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 148 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy as first-line therapy. Patients were divided into two groups based on regimens, namely IO-IO and IO-TKI. The associations between immune-related adverse event development and outcomes, such as progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, 67 of 91 (74%) and 31 of 57 (54%) patients, respectively, experienced at least one immune-related adverse event and the rate was significantly higher in the IO-IO group (p = 0.0204), where immune-related adverse events development was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (p < 0.0001) and overall survival (p = 0.0102), and a higher objective response rate (p = 0.0028). A multivariate analysis revealed immune-related adverse event development as an independent factor for longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.25; p < 0.0001) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.42; p = 0.0287). There were no significant associations between immune-related adverse events and progression-free survival, overall survival, or objective response rate in the IO-TKI group. CONCLUSIONS: The development of immune-related adverse events was positively associated with the outcome of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with IO-IO combination therapy; no such correlation was observed for IO-TKI combination therapy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , /therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
16.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 21(1): 136-145, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36031535

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the impact of body mass index (BMI) on treatment outcomes including survival, tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or urothelial carcinoma (UC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in an Asian population. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 309 patients with advanced RCC or UC who received ICIs between September 2016 and July 2021. The patients were divided into high- (i.e., ≥25 kg/m2) and low-BMI (<25 kg/m2) groups according to the BMI at the time of treatment initiation. RESULTS: Overall, 57 patients (18.4%) were classified into the high-BMI group. In RCC patients treated with ICIs as first-line therapy or UC treated with pembrolizumab, progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.309; p = 0.842), overall survival (OS) (p = 0.701; p = 0.983), and objective response rate (ORR) (p = 0.163; p = 0.553) were comparable between the high- and low-BMI groups. In RCC patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy as later-line therapy, OS (p = 0.101) and ORR (p = 0.102) were comparable, but PFS was significantly longer in the high-BMI group (p = 0.0272). Further, multivariate analysis showed that BMI was not an independent factor of PFS or OS in all the treatment groups (any, p>0.05). As for AE profiles, in nivolumab monotherapy, the rate was significantly higher in the high-BMI group (p = 0.0203), whereas in the other two treatments, the rate was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: BMI was not associated with survival or response rates of advanced RCC or UC patients treated with ICIs in an Asian population. AEs might frequently develop in high-BMI patients with RCC in nivolumab monotherapy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Body Mass Index , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/chemically induced , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology
17.
Clin Case Rep ; 10(8): e6151, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35937021

ABSTRACT

We experienced the case of a patient with advanced breast cancer who failed to receive comprehensive care despite regular video conferencing with her physician during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in delayed detection of liver metastasis. Inter-hospital collaboration is required to provide uninterrupted cancer care to those disproportionately affected by crises.

18.
Target Oncol ; 17(4): 475-482, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35789472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the efficacy and safety profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) trial-ineligible patients in the real world remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of trial eligibility on ICI-based combination therapy for mRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected clinical data of mRCC patients receiving ICIs since 2016, and 222 patients were registered. Among these patients, we evaluated 93 patients treated with ICI-based combination therapy, including nivolumab plus ipilimumab, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, or avelumab plus axitinib, as first-line therapy. Patients were classified into the trial-ineligible group when they had at least one of the following factors at the time of treatment initiation: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) < 70%, hemoglobin level < 9.0 g/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2, platelet count < 100,000/µL, neutrophil count < 1500/µL, non-clear cell histology, or brain metastasis. The remaining patients were classified into the trial-eligible group. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (52%) were classified into the trial-ineligible group. The frequency of patients with trial-ineligible factors was highest for low eGFR (n = 20, 45%), followed by non-clear cell histology (n = 17, 36%) and low KPS score (n = 12, 25%). There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (median: 24.0 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.416), overall survival (1-year rate: 87.0% vs. 85.3%, p = 0.634), or objective response rate (52% vs. 42%, p = 0.308) between the trial-eligible and -ineligible patients. The incidence rate of adverse events was higher in the trial-eligible patients than in the trial-ineligible patients (91% vs. 75%, p = 0.0397); however, the rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events was comparable between the two groups (42% vs. 40%, p = 0.796). CONCLUSIONS: There are many trial-ineligible patients in the real world. Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of ICI-based combination therapy in trial-ineligible patients were non-inferior compared with those of trial-eligible patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Axitinib/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Humans , Immunotherapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Progression-Free Survival
19.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 52(10): 1208-1214, 2022 Oct 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35780441

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore the therapeutic role of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line systemic therapy at our affiliated institutions were retrospectively evaluated. We focused on the prognosis, including tumor responses in primary kidney and metastatic lesions in patients treated with deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy. In addition, the overall survival according to nephrectomy status (i.e. deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy vs. upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy vs. without cytoreductive nephrectomy) was compared. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 12.0 months, seven (30%) patients received deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy at a median time of 10.4 months after nivolumab plus ipilimumab initiation. All the patients showed tumor shrinkage in their primary kidney lesions, including six (86%) patients with ≥30% of shrinkage. Metastatic lesions were also shrunk by ≥30% in six (86%) patients, including two (29%) obtaining complete response. At the last time of follow-up, three (43%) patients were disease-free. The overall survival rate after nivolumab plus ipilimumab initiation tended to be higher in patients with deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy compared with those with upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (1-year survival rate: 100% vs. 72.4%, P = 0.0587) and those without cytoreductive nephrectomy (vs. 58.2%, P = 0.0613). CONCLUSIONS: The present retrospective data showed that deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy had the potential to exert a therapeutic effect in a subset of patients who obtained favorable tumor responses to nivolumab plus ipilimumab for a certain period. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the prognostic impact of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy after frontline immunotherapy in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Humans , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Nephrectomy , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
20.
Int J Urol ; 29(8): 860-865, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35584916

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is well-established and effective for bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The objective of this study was to examine the detection rate of incidental prostate cancer by holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and variables associated with them. METHODS: A total of 612 patients were enrolled. We retrospectively examined the detection rate of incidental prostate cancer and perioperative variables associated with them. RESULTS: Forty-nine of 612 patients were diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher prostate-specific antigen density (odds ratio 3.34, 95% confidence interval 1.02-10.94, P = 0.05), higher prostate-specific antigen density of the transition zone (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval 1.02-5.09, P = 0.04), and findings of the prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (peripheral zone: odds ratio 4.71, 95% confidence interval 1.70-13.1, P = 0.003; transition zone: odds ratio 3.46, 95% confidence interval 1.74-6.86, P < 0.001; peripheral and transition zones: odds ratio 6.00, 95% confidence interval 1.51-23.8, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with incidental prostate cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that findings of the prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (peripheral zone: odds ratio 4.36, 95% confidence interval 1.49-12.8, P = 0.001; transition zone: odds ratio 3.54, 95% confidence interval 1.75-7.16, P < 0.001; peripheral and transition zones: odds ratio 6.14, 95% confidence interval 1.53-24.5, P = 0.01) was an independent risk factor for incidental prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: The detection rate of incidental prostate cancer was 8.0%, and findings of the prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging were an independent predictive factor for incidental prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Lasers, Solid-State , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Prostatic Neoplasms , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Humans , Laser Therapy/methods , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Male , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostate/pathology , Prostate/surgery , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Prostatic Hyperplasia/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/methods , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...