ABSTRACT
Myelolipoma is a benign tumor composed of mature adipose tissue and normal hematopoietic components. It usually occurs in the adrenal glands but rarely in the extra-adrenal region. However, it is difficult to differentiate extra-adrenal myelolipoma from well-differentiated liposarcoma on the basis of the radiological findings. We report the case of a 66-year-old male with perirenal and extra-adrenal myelolipoma who underwent radical tumor resection with nephrectomy after a preoperative diagnosis of liposarcoma. Intraoperative assessment by the surgeon and intraoperative pathological evaluation are important considering the divergent prognoses of myelolipoma and liposarcoma.
ABSTRACT
A 42-year-oldman visited our hospital because of gradually worsening penile swelling over 3 weeks. A hard mass on the glans was palpated; however, we were unable to observe it due to severe phimosis. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis revealed enlargement of glans and swelling of bilateral inguinal lymph nodes as both showed a low signal intensity on T2-weightedimaging, a high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging, and a low signal intensity on the apparent diffusion coefficient map. Fluorine- 18-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography showed FDG uptake at the external iliac, common iliac, obturator, and cervical lymph nodes besides the glans and inguinal lymph nodes. Although his serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen level was within the normal range, his soluble interleukin-2 receptor concentration was elevated to 2,290 U/ml. Therefore, we diagnosed these lesions as penile cancer with multiple lymph node metastases, with a possible differential diagnosis of malignant lymphoma. We planned a penile needle biopsy; however, the rapid plasma reagin test and treponema pallidum hemagglutination test, which were performed during the preoperative examination, were positive and led to a diagnosis of secondary syphilis. The patient was treated with oral amoxicillin at 1,500 mg/day for 8 weeks. The penile and lymph node swelling subsided after starting medication.
Subject(s)
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Penile Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Penile Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph NodesABSTRACT
Previous studies indicated the occurrence of compartment syndrome after testicular detorsion. In such cases, testicular blood flow may improve with tunica albuginea incision. A 14-year-old man presented with right-sided testicular torsion. No improvement in testicular appearance after detorsion led to a tunica albuginea incision for immediate recovery of testicular blood flow. The affected testis, covered with a tunica vaginalis patch, exhibited no atrophy at the 6-month follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed that the affected testis had blood flow comparable to that on the unaffected side. This technique is useful for avoiding orchiectomy in testes with poor blood flow after detorsion.
ABSTRACT
Preoperative imaging differentiation between ChRCC and RO is difficult with conventional subjective evaluation, and the development of quantitative analysis is a clinical challenge. Forty-nine patients underwent partial or radical nephrectomy preceded by MRI and followed by pathological diagnosis with ChRCC or RO (ChRCC: n = 41, RO: n = 8). The whole-lesion volume of interest was set on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps of 1.5T-MRI. The importance of selected texture features (TFs) was evaluated, and diagnostic models were created using random forest (RF) analysis. The Mean Decrease Gini as calculated through RF analysis was the highest for mean_ADC_value. ChRCC had a significantly lower mean_ADC_value than RO (1.26 vs. 1.79 × 10−3 mm2/s, p < 0.0001). Feature selection by the Boruta method identified the first-quartile ADC value and GLZLM_HGZE as important features. ROC curve analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the classification performances between the mean_ADC_value-only model and the Boruta model (AUC: 0.954 vs. 0.969, p = 0.236). The mean ADC value had good predictive ability for the distinction between ChRCC and RO, comparable to that of the combination of TFs optimized for the evaluated cohort. The mean ADC value may be useful in distinguishing between ChRCC and RO.
