Increase in Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery Regarding the Therapeutic Approach of Gastric Cancer Detected by Cancer Screening in Saga Prefecture, Japan.

Objective Despite recent advances in endoscopic treatment and laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancers, an increase in the uptake of these therapeutic approaches has not yet been fully demonstrated. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the change in therapeutic approaches regarding the treatment of gastric cancers detected by cancer screening in Saga Prefecture, Japan between April 2002 and March 2011. Methods Gastric cancer screening by X-ray was performed on 311,074 subjects between April 2002 and March 2011. In total, 534 patients were thereafter diagnosed with gastric cancer. Eighteen subjects were excluded because precise details of their treatment were not available. To evaluate the changes in the therapeutic approach, the observation period was divided into three 3-year intervals: Period I: April 2002 to March 2005; Period II: April 2005 to March 2008; Period III: April 2008 to March 2011. Results The use of open laparotomy for the treatment of gastric cancer decreased, and laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic treatment increased markedly in a time-dependent manner. A 2.5-fold increase in endoscopic treatment, and a 18.4-fold increase in laparoscopic surgery were observed in Period III compared with Period I (after adjusting for age and tumor characteristics). Conclusion Endoscopic treatment and laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer increased during the investigation period (2002-2011), although the tumor characteristics of the gastric cancers detected through cancer screening in Saga Prefecture, Japan did not show any changes.

Repeated screening with fecal immunochemical tests reduced the incidence of colorectal cancers in Saga, Japan.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Screening with fecal occult blood test has reduced mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC), with fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) widely utilized for CRC screening in Japan. To evaluate the importance of repeated FIT screening, the incidence of CRC was compared in patients undergoing initial and repeated screening. METHODOLOGY: Participants aged ≥40 years in Saga, Japan, were invited to undergo a 2-day FIT. FIT positive subjects were verified by colonoscopy to evaluate the CRC incidence rates. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2007, 55,595 individuals were invited to undergo CRC screening, including 47,168 undergoing repeated and 8,427 undergoing initial screening. Of the 5,832 FIT-positive subjects, 4,615 were assessed by colonoscopy, with 114 diagnosed as having CRC. Of these 114 patients, 67 had early and 47 had advanced CRC. The risk of CRC was 63% lower in the repeated than in the initial screening group (p<0.0001). Of the 67 patients with early CRC, 42 underwent endoscopic resection, with the rate significantly higher in the repeated than in the initial screening group (p = 0.01). Overall survival was longer in screened subjects than in those who visited hospitals with clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated CRC screening with FIT reduced the incidence of CRC in Saga, Japan.

Clinical outcomes of EMR for gastric tumors: historical pilot evaluation between endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional mucosal resection.

BACKGROUND: EMR is currently a standard treatment for mucosal gastric tumors. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed for en bloc resection. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the clinical outcomes of ESD compared with conventional EMR. DESIGN: Not applicable. SETTING: A historical control study was performed between EMR and ESD. PATIENTS: EMR of 245 gastric tumors was performed in 229 patients. Lesions were divided into two groups. Conventional EMR was performed in group A from February 1999 to June 2001, and ESD was performed in group B from July 2001 to March 2004. Group B was divided into subgroups: subgroup B-1 underwent ESD from July 2001 to March 2003 and subgroup B-2 from April 2003 to March 2004. INTERVENTIONS: All lesions were resected with conventional EMR or with ESD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: En bloc resection rate, rate in completeness of resection, required time, remnant ratio, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: With regard to lesions >10 mm in size, the en bloc resection rate and the rate in completeness of resection of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (p < 0.01). Although the required time was longer in group B than A (p < 0.01), it was shorter in subgroup B-2 compared with B-1 (p < 0.05) with lesions < or =10 mm in size. The remnant ratio and perforation rate were not different between groups. LIMITATIONS: Not applicable. CONCLUSIONS: The en bloc resection rate was better with ESD than with conventional EMR. The required time was longer in ESD, but this disadvantage might be improved with experience.