ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to describe the MR appearance of Kimura disease and to interpret the differences in appearance from malignant parotid gland tumours. METHODS: MR studies of seven patients with Kimura disease were reviewed. The MR studies included T(1) weighted, T(2) weighted, short tau inversion-recovery, diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. RESULTS: Typical Kimura disease featured subcutaneous lesions, continuously infiltrated parotid lesions from the subcutaneous lesions with or without intraparotid lymphadenopathies, and reactive cervical lymphadenopathies. The subcutaneous lesions showed gradual upward enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. Reactive lymph nodes showed early enhancement on contrast-enhanced MR images and marked high intensity and low apparent diffusion coefficient values on DW images. CONCLUSION: An indication for making the diagnosis of Kimura disease should be the subcutaneous tissue of the head and neck showing gradual upward enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and a lack of high intensity on DW images, associated with reactive lymph nodes.
Subject(s)
Angiolymphoid Hyperplasia with Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lymphoma/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Angiolymphoid Hyperplasia with Eosinophilia/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphoma/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Parotid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Parotid Neoplasms/pathology , Young AdultABSTRACT
We set out to retrospectively review the clinical and imaging features of patients with post-radiation sarcoma, especially in the head and neck region. We reviewed the records of 4194 patients with carcinoma of the head and neck region who had a history of radiation. They had undergone CT and/or MRI. Medical records were reviewed for the primary diagnosis, radiation history and latency period to the development of sarcoma. The patients included four men and two women with a mean age of 64.5 years. The mean latency period for the development of sarcoma was 11.5 years. Primary diagnoses were maxillary carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma of the oral floor, tonsilar carcinoma, soft palate carcinoma and tongue carcinoma. Histopathological examinations revealed osteosarcoma, spindle cell sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, spindle cell carcinoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma, respectively. Common findings were a heterogeneous and well-enhanced soft tissue mass and bone destruction. There is at present little or no prospect for the effective prevention of radiation-induced sarcoma of the head and neck. This emphasizes the importance of the earliest possible diagnosis for such patients. The imaging findings are not diagnosis specific, but strict follow-up within the radiation field by CT and MRI and an appreciation of the expected latency period may help to provide the diagnosis. When radiotherapy is performed for head and neck neoplasms, periodic follow-up observations may be necessary for many years.
