Effect of 2-Weeks Ischemic Preconditioning on Exercise Performance: A Pilot Study.

An acute bout of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been reported to increase exercise performance. Nevertheless, the ineffectiveness of acute IPC on exercise performance has also been reported. Similarly, the effect of a shot-term intervention of IPC on exercise performance remains controversial in previous studies. In this study, we examined the effects of short-term IPC intervention on whole and local exercise performances and its-related parameters. Ten healthy young males undertook a 2-weeks IPC intervention (6 days/weeks). The IPC applied to both legs with three episodes of a 5-min ischemia and 5-min reperfusion cycle. Whole-body exercise performance was assessed by peak O2 consumption (VO2: VO2 peak) during a ramp-incremental cycling test. Local exercise performance was assessed by time to task failure during a knee extensor sustained endurance test. A repeated moderate-intensity cycling test was performed to evaluate dynamics of pulmonary VO2 and muscle deoxygenation. The knee extensor maximal voluntary contraction and quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area measurements were performed to explore the potentiality for strength gain and muscle hypertrophy. The whole-body exercise performance (i.e., VO2 peak) did not change before and after the intervention (P = 0.147, Power = 0.09, Effect size = 0.21, 95% confidence interval: -0.67, 1.09). Moreover, the local exercise performance (i.e., time to task failure) did not change before and after the intervention (P = 0.923, Power = 0.05, Effect size = 0.02, 95% confidence interval: -0.86, 0.89). Furthermore, no such changes were observed for all parameters measured using a repeated moderate-intensity cycling test and knee extensor strength and quadriceps femoris size measurements. These findings suggest that a 2-weeks IPC intervention cannot increase whole-body and local exercise performances, corresponding with ineffectiveness on its-related parameters in healthy young adults. However, the statistical analyses of changes in the measured parameters in this study showed insufficient statistical power and sensitivity, due to the small sample size. Additionally, this study did not include control group(s) with placebo and/or nocebo. Therefore, further studies with a larger sample size and control group are required to clarify the present findings.

Work volume is an important variable in determining the degree of inhibitory control improvements following resistance exercise.

We previously determined that improvement in cognitive inhibitory control (IC) immediately after localized resistance exercise was greater for high-intensity resistance exercise (HRE) than for low-intensity resistance exercise (LRE). However, our previous study used the same total repetitions (i.e., same repetitions per set) between HRE and LRE; therefore, the difference in postexercise IC improvement might be due to a difference in work volume (i.e., intensity × total repetitions). In this study, we compared the effect of high-volume (HV)-LRE to that of volume-matched HRE on postexercise IC improvements. Twenty-two healthy, young males performed both HV-LRE and HRE in a crossover design. Exercise loads for HV-LRE and HRE were set at 35% and 70% of one-repetition maximum, respectively. The bilateral knee extension exercises for HV-LRE and HRE were programmed for six sets with 20 and 10 repetitions, respectively, per set. IC was measured using the color-word Stroop task (CWST) at six time points; baseline, pre-exercise, immediate postexercise, and every 10 min during the 30-min postexercise recovery period. The reverse-Stroop interference score decreased significantly immediately after HV-LRE and HRE compared with that before each exercise (decreasing rate >34 and >38%, respectively, vs. baseline and pre-exercise; all ps < .05), and the decreased score remained significant until 20 min after both protocols (decreasing rate >40 and >38%, respectively, vs. baseline and pre-exercise; all ps < .05). The degree of the postexercise IC improvements did not differ significantly between the two protocols. These findings suggest that HV-LRE improves IC in a similar manner to volume-matched HRE.

Pre-activation affects the effect of stretch-shortening cycle by modulating fascicle behavior.

The torque attained during active shortening is enhanced after an active stretch (stretch-shortening cycle, SSC). This study examined the influence of pre-activation on fascicle behavior and the SSC effect. Subjects exhibited the following three conditions by electrically induced plantar flexions. In the isometric-concentric (ISO-CON) condition, subjects exhibited active shortening from dorsiflexion of 15° to 0° after isometric pre-activation. In the eccentric-concentric (ECC-CON) condition, subjects exhibited the above active shortening immediately after the eccentric pre-activation. In the isometric-eccentric-concentric (ISO-ECC-CON) condition, isometric pre-activation was conducted before exhibiting the ECC-CON maneuver. Joint torque and fascicle length of the medial gastrocnemius were compared. The joint torque at the onset and end of shortening was larger in the ISO-ECC-CON than in the ISO-CON or ECC-CON conditions, while no differences were found between ISO-CON and ECC-CON conditions. The magnitude of fascicle elongation attained during the active stretch was larger in the ISO-ECC-CON than in the ECC-CON condition. This could be caused by the shorter fascicle length at the onset of active stretch due to isometric pre-activation. This shorter fascicle length could lead to larger fascicle elongation during the subsequent active stretch, which should emphasize the effect of active stretch-induced force enhancement mechanism.

Isometric preactivation before active lengthening increases residual force enhancement.

INTRODUCTION: The isometric force attained after active stretch is greater than that attained in a purely isometric contraction. This phenomenon is called residual force enhancement (RFE). The purpose was to examine the influence of isometric preactivation conducted just before active stretch on the magnitude of RFE in plantar flexors. METHODS: In the control condition, subjects conducted isometric contraction at 15° of dorsiflexion. In the no preactivation condition, the isometric contraction at 15° of dorsiflexion was conducted after an eccentric contraction from 0° to 15° of dorsiflexion. In the isometric preactivation condition, an isometric contraction was conducted for preactivation before conducting the same routine as in the no preactivation condition. Isometric torque at the end of isometric contraction at 15° of dorsiflexion was compared among conditions to examine whether isometric preactivation affects the magnitude of RFE. The fascicle behaviors of the medial gastrocnemius were recorded by ultrasonography. RESULTS: The isometric torque attained in the preactivation condition was greater than that in the control condition (P = 0.017). There was no significant difference between no preactivation and control conditions (P = 0.744). The magnitude of fascicle elongation during active stretch was greater in the preactivation than in the no preactivation condition (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Compared to the control condition, greater isometric torque was observed only in the preactivation condition, indicating that substantial RFE was induced only in the preactivation condition. This difference would be explained by the lesser degree of fascicle elongation during active stretch in the no preactivation condition.