Diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies using an overnight-stored pancreatic juice cell block specimen.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreatic juice cytology is useful for diagnosing pancreatic duct strictures and cystic lesions. However, some cases cannot be diagnosed using cytology. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the overnight-stored pancreatic juice cell block (CB) method for diagnosing pancreatic disease. METHODS: This retrospective study included 32 patients who presented with pancreatic duct strictures or cystic lesions between 2018 and 2024. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CB method and single/multiple pancreatic juice cytology were compared to evaluate the utility of the CB. RESULT: An endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage tube was placed in the main pancreatic duct, and pancreatic juice was collected to create a CB specimen. The median amount of pancreatic juice collected was 180(30-200) mL, and the median number of cytological examinations was three(2-8). Of the 32 cases, 13 were malignant, and 19 were benign (non-malignant). The sensitivity was significantly higher for the CB method (62 %) than for single cytology(15 %, P = 0.0414), and there was no significant difference between CB and multiple cytology(54 %, P = 1.0). The specificity and accuracy were not significantly different between the CB method and single or multiple cytology. When multiple cytology and CB were combined, sensitivity improved to 77 %. The pathological findings of the CB specimens were similar to the surgical specimens, including immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION: The overnight-stored pancreatic juice CB method was more effective than single cytology, with similar sensitivities to multiple cytology and can also be used for immunohistochemistry. The pancreatic juice CB method is useful for pancreatic juice assessment.

Evaluating optimal bilateral biliary stenting in endoscopic reintervention after initial plastic stent dysfunction for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: The placement of plastic stents (PS), including intraductal PS (IS), is useful in patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) because of patency and ease of endoscopic reintervention (ERI). However, the optimal stent replacement method for PS remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective study included 322 patients with UMHBO. Among them, 146 received PS placement as initial drainage (across-the-papilla PS [aPS], 54; IS, 92), whereas 75 required ERI. Eight bilateral aPS, 21 bilateral IS, and 17 bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placements met the inclusion criteria. Rates of technical and clinical success, adverse events, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), overall survival, and secondary ERI were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant intergroup differences in rates of technical or clinical success, adverse events, RBO occurrence, or overall survival. The median TRBO was significantly shorter in the aPS group (47 days) than IS (91 days; P = 0.0196) and SEMS (143 days; P < 0.01) groups. Median TRBO did not differ significantly between the IS and SEMS groups (P = 0.44). On Cox multivariate analysis, the aPS group had the shortest stent patency (hazard ratio 2.67 [95% confidence interval 1.05-6.76], P = 0.038). For secondary ERI, the median endoscopic procedure time was significantly shorter in the IS (22 min) vs. SEMS (40 min) group (P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral IS and SEMS placement featured prolonged patency after first ERI. Because bilateral IS placement is faster than SEMS placement and IS can be removed during secondary ERI, it may be a good option for first ERI.

Utility of bilateral intraductal plastic stent for malignant hilar biliary obstruction compared with bilateral self-expandable metal stent: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intraductal plastic stent (IS) placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) is an effective option for biliary drainage. However, the effectiveness of bilateral IS placement compared with bilateral self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement remains unclear. METHODS: Overall, 301 patients with UMHBO were enrolled; 38 patients underwent bilateral IS placement (IS group) and 38 patients underwent SEMS placement (SEMS group) in the propensity score-based cohort. Both groups were compared for technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs), recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), overall survival (OS), and endoscopic reintervention (ERI). RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding technical and clinical success, AEs and RBO occurrence rates, TRBO, or OS. The median initial endoscopic procedure time was significantly shorter in the IS group (23 vs 49 minutes, P < .01). ERI was performed on 20 and 19 patients in the IS and SEMS groups, respectively. The median ERI procedure time was significantly shorter in the IS group (22 vs 35 minutes, P = .04). Median TRBO after ERI with plastic stent placement tended to be longer in the IS group (306 vs 56 days, P = .068). A Cox multivariate analysis showed that the IS group was the significant related factor for TRBO after ERI (hazard ratio, .31; 95% confidence interval, .25-.82; P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral IS placement can reduce the duration of the endoscopic procedure and provide sufficient stent patency both initially and after ERI stent placement, and the stents are removable. Bilateral IS placement is considered a good option for initial UMHBO drainage. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000050546.).

Evaluation of the Cell Block Method Using Overnight-Stored Bile for Malignant Biliary Stricture Diagnosis.

The specimen collection and subsequent pathological diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture (MBS) are difficult. This study aimed to determine whether the cell block (CB) method using overnight-stored bile is useful in the diagnosis of MBS. This trial was a single-arm prospective study involving a total of 59 patients with suspected MBS. The primary endpoint was cancer detectability and accuracy using the CB method, and a comparison with the detectability and accuracy achieved with bile cytology was made. The immunohistochemical sensitivity for maspin and p53 was also investigated in the CB and surgical specimens. We were able to collect bile from all 59 patients, and 45 of these patients were clinically diagnosed with MBS. The cancer detectability using the CB method (62.2%) was significantly higher than that using cytology (37.8%) (p = 0.0344). When CB was combined with biopsy, the rates of cancer detectability (75.6%) and accuracy (81.4%) increased. In eight patients who received surgical therapy, maspin- and p53-immunohistochemistry was applied to the surgical and CB specimens, and cancer cells in both specimens showed positive cytoplasmic and nuclear staining for maspin and nuclear staining for p53. The CB method is, thus, useful for detecting malignancy (UMIN000034707).

[Non-surgical management using pancreatic duct drainage for a traumatic pancreatic injury with main pancreatic rupture: a case report].

After an abdominal injury, a woman in her 20s presented to our hospital with abdominal pain. Pancreatic trauma was discovered on computed tomography, along with a pancreatic duct injury and pancreatic juice leakage. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography revealed a 10-mm rupture of the pancreatic body's main pancreatic duct (MPD) and intraperitoneal leakage of contrast enzyme from the MPD. The pancreatic injury was treated with the placement of a 5-Fr endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage tube in the ruptured distal side of the pancreatic duct;however, 3 months later, the MPD stenosis occurred. The MPD stenosis was improved using a 7-Fr pancreatic stent, and finally, placement of the pancreatic stent was not required for MPD drainage.