Cartilage Conduction Sounds in Cases of Wearing Different Transducers on a Head and Torso Simulator with a Manipulated Ear Pinna Simulator.

Cartilage conduction is known widely as a third hearing transmission mechanism after the air and bone conduction methods, and transducers dedicated to the production of cartilage conduction sounds have been developed by several Japanese companies. To estimate the acoustic performance of the five cartilage conduction transducers selected for this study, both airborne sounds and cartilage conduction sounds were measured. Airborne sounds can be measured using a commercial condenser microphone; however, cartilage conduction sounds are impossible to measure using a conventional head and torso simulator (HATS), because the standard-issue ear pinna simulator cannot reproduce cartilage conduction sounds with the same spectral characteristics as the corresponding sounds measured in humans. Therefore, this study replaced the standard-issue simulator with a developed pinna simulator that can produce similar spectral characteristics to those of humans. The HATS manipulated in this manner realized results demonstrating that transducers that fitted the entrance to the external auditory canal more densely could produce greater cartilage conduction sounds. Among the five transducers under test, the ring-shaped device, which was not much larger than the entrance to the canal, satisfied the spectral requirements.

Cartilage Conduction Hearing Aids in Clinical Practice.

A relatively loud sound is audible when a vibrator is attached to the aural cartilage. This form of conduction is referred to as cartilage conduction (CC). In Japan, a new type of hearing aid has been developed using CC and has been available in clinical practice since 2017. A clinical study conducted prior to its launch demonstrated its benefits, particularly in patients with aural atresia who were unable to use air conduction hearing aids. Several studies have been published on the benefits of CC hearing aids since their introduction into clinical practice. Most of the patients included in these studies had canal stenosis or aural atresia, and the purchase rates of CC hearing aids in these patients were relatively high. However, the number of patients with canal-open ears was small, with overall poor results in the trials, with the exception of patients with continuous otorrhea. CC hearing aids are considered a good option for compensating for hearing loss in ears with canal stenosis or atresia in both bilateral and unilateral cases. However, CC hearing aids are not currently considered the first choice for patients with a canal-open ear.

Sound Quality Factors Inducing the Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response.

The acoustical characteristics of auditory triggers often recommended to generate the autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR) on Internet platforms were investigated by parameterizing their sound qualities following Zwicker's procedure and calculating autocorrelation (ACF)/interaural cross-correlation (IACF) functions. For 20 triggers (10 human- and 10 nature-generated sounds), scores (on a five-point Likert scale) of the ASMR, perceived loudness, perceived pitch, comfort, and perceived closeness to the sound image were obtained for 26 participants by questionnaire. The results show that the human-generated sounds were more likely to trigger stronger ASMR than nature-generated sounds, and the primary psychological aspect relating to the ASMR was the perceived closeness, with the triggers perceived more closely to a listener having higher ASMR scores. The perceived closeness was evaluated by the loudness and roughness (among Zwicker's parameter) for the nature-generated sounds and the interaural cross-correlation coefficient (IACC) (among ACF/IACF parameters) for the human-generated sounds. The nature-generated sounds with higher loudness and roughness and the human-generated sounds with lower IACC were likely to evoke the ASMR sensation.

Effect of transducer placements on thresholds in ears with an abnormal ear canal and severe conductive hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: Providing hearing compensation to patients with aural atresia is considerably challenging. Hearing aid transducers vibrating the aural cartilage (cartilage conduction; CC) have been devised, and hearing aids utilizing them (CC hearing aids) have quickly become a beneficial option for aural atresia in clinical applications. However, it remains unclear which placement (on the aural cartilage or mastoid) is beneficial to signal transmission. METHODS: This study included 35 patients (53 ears with an abnormal ear canal and severe conductive hearing loss) who were using CC hearing aids. Thresholds were compared between the transducers on the aural cartilage and on the mastoid. RESULTS: In ears with bony aural atresia, thresholds were significantly improved when the transducer was placed on the aural cartilage compared to when it was placed on the mastoid for frequencies ≤ 500 Hz (P < .05). In aural atresia ears with a fibrotic tissue pathway, the aural cartilage stimulation improved the thresholds by approximately 20 dB for frequencies ≤ 1000 Hz (P < .05). In non-atretic ears, the aural cartilage locations significantly worsened the threshold at 4000 Hz (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that placing the transducer at the aural cartilage improved the mid-to-low frequency thresholds compared to mastoid transduction in aural atretic ears. In contrast, no clear improvement to the signal transmission due to the transducer's placement on the aural cartilage was recognized in non-atretic ears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Benefits of Cartilage Conduction Hearing Aids for Speech Perception in Unilateral Aural Atresia.

Severe conductive hearing loss due to unilateral aural atresia leads to auditory and developmental disorders, such as difficulty in hearing in challenging situations. Bone conduction devices compensate for the disability but unfortunately have several disadvantages. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of cartilage conduction (CC) hearing aids for speech perception in unilateral aural atresia. Eleven patients with unilateral aural atresia were included. Each participant used a CC hearing aid in the atretic ear. Speech recognition scores in the binaural hearing condition were obtained at low speech levels to evaluate the contribution of aided atretic ears to speech perception. Speech recognition scores were also obtained with and without presentation of noise. These assessments were compared between the unaided and aided atretic ear conditions. Speech recognition scores at low speech levels were significantly improved under the aided atretic ear condition (p < 0.05). A CC hearing aid in the unilateral atretic ear did not significantly improve the speech recognition score in a symmetrical noise presentation condition. The binaural hearing benefits of CC hearing aids in unilateral aural atresia were predominantly considered a diotic summation. Other benefits of binaural hearing remain to be investigated.

Vibrational and Acoustical Characteristics of Ear Pinna Simulators That Differ in Hardness.

Because cartilage conduction-the transmission of sound via the aural cartilage-has different auditory pathways from well-known air and bone conduction, how the output volume in the external auditory canal is stimulated remains unknown. To develop a simulator approximating the conduction of sound in ear cartilage, the vibrations of the pinna and sound in the external auditory canal were measured using pinna simulators made of silicon rubbers of different hardness (A40, A20, A10, A5, A0) as measured by a durometer. The same procedure, as well as a current calibration method for air conduction devices, was applied to an existing pinna simulator, the Head and Torso Simulator (hardness A5). The levels for vibration acceleration and sound pressure from these pinna simulators show spectral peaks at dominant frequencies (below 1.5 kHz) for the conduction of sound in cartilage. These peaks were likely to move to lower frequencies as hardness decreases. On approaching the hardness of actual aural cartilage (A10 to A20), the simulated levels for vibration acceleration and sound pressure approximated the measurements of human ears. The adjustment of the hardness used in pinna simulators is an important factor in simulating accurately the conduction of sound in cartilage.

Cartilage Conduction Hearing and Its Clinical Application.

Cartilage conduction (CC) is a form of conduction that allows a relatively loud sound to be audible when a transducer is placed on the aural cartilage. The CC transmission mechanism has gradually been elucidated, allowing for the development of CC hearing aids (CC-HAs), which are clinically available in Japan. However, CC is still not fully understood. This review summarizes previous CC reports to facilitate its understanding. Concerning the transmission mechanism, the sound pressure level in the ear canal was found to increase when the transducer was attached to the aural cartilage, compared to an unattached condition. Further, inserting an earplug and injecting water into the ear canal shifted the CC threshold, indicating the considerable influence of cartilage-air conduction on the transmission. In CC, the aural cartilage resembles the movable plate of a vibration speaker. This unique transduction mechanism is responsible for the CC characteristics. In terms of clinical applications, CC-HAs are a good option for patients with aural atresia, despite inferior signal transmission compared to bone conduction in bony atretic ears. The advantages of CC, namely comfort, stable fixation, esthetics, and non-invasiveness, facilitate its clinical use.

Effect of fixation place on airborne sound in cartilage conduction.

When a transducer is placed on aural cartilage, relatively loud sound becomes audible in a conduction form termed cartilage conduction (CC). Previous studies have revealed the acoustical differences between CC and conventional air or bone conduction. This study elucidates the working principle of CC through measurements of threshold shifts by water injection into the ear canal under various fixation place conditions. Seven volunteers with normal hearing participated. A lightweight transducer was fixed for three CC conductions (on the tragus, antitragus, and intertragal incisure), and two non-CC conditions (on the pre-tragus and mastoid). Thresholds were measured at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz in the 0%-, 40%-, and 80%-water injection conditions. Results for the three CC conditions revealed unique features different from those for the non-CC conditions. For the CC conditions, the thresholds increased by the 40%-water injection at all frequencies. However, with additional water injection (80%-water injection), the thresholds decreased at 500 and 1000 Hz; in particular, dramatically at 500 Hz. The results suggest that a direct vibration of the aural cartilage is important to obtaining the significant contribution of airborne sound to hearing above 1000 Hz. Fixation place results in no significant difference in acoustic features among CC conditions.

Sound localisation ability using cartilage conduction hearing aids in bilateral aural atresia.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with bilateral aural atresia often exhibit poor sound localisation due to bone conduction (BC) features. However, most patients using cartilage conduction (CC) hearing aids reported improvement of sound localisation. DESIGN: CC hearing aids were fitted binaurally. Subsequently, sound localisation was evaluated in three conditions: unaided, aided with previously used hearing aids (air conduction or BC hearing aids), and aided with CC hearing aids. Ears were evaluated with eight loudspeakers positioned in a full-circle at 45-degree interval. Loudspeakers were classified into left and right by midline and front and back by horizontal line. The abilities to distinguish left from right and front from back were compared among three conditions. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirteen patients with bilateral aural atresia participated. RESULTS: The ability to distinguish sounds originating from left or right for participants aided with CC hearing aids was significantly better than that for other conditions (p < 0.05). For distinguishing sounds originating from front or back, unaided ears were significantly better than ears aided with CC hearing aids (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CC hearing aids provide the ability to distinguish left from right in patients with bilateral aural atresia.

Cartilage conduction as the third pathway for sound transmission.

It has been long considered that air and bone are the two major mediators that conduct sounds to the inner ear. In 2004, Hosoi found that vibration of aural cartilage, generated by placing gently a transducer on it, could create audible sound with the same level of clarity as air- and bone-conduction sound. He thus proposed the term "cartilage conduction" for this concept. This research identified a third mediator for sound conduction to the inner ear. Hosoi also proposed the development of novel communication devices, such as hearing aids, telephones, etc. using his findings. For cartilage conduction, three sound pathways can be assumed. The transducer vibration may cause airborne sound which passes into the external auditory canal through the canal entrance (direct air pathway). Alternatively, the vibration at the cartilage may generate audible sound in the external auditory canal (cartilage-air pathway), or propagate directly to the inner ear through the skull bone (cartilage-bone pathway). A series of studies has illustrated that the cartilage-air pathway is dominant for hearing sensations in listeners with normal ears. The cartilage-bone pathway works for patients with bony aural atresia. A fourth pathway, the fibrotic-tissue pathway, is considered to act in the case of fibrotic aural atresia. In this review, we summarize this series of studies and discuss the nature of cartilage conduction.

Frequency characteristics and speech recognition in cartilage conduction.

OBJECTIVE: Cartilage conduction (CC) is a new transduction form, and hearing devices that utilize CC present a new option for patients with aural atresia. However, in occluded ears, low-tone sounds are transmitted very effectively, resulting in excessive low-tone sound emphasis and speech recognition reduction. This study aimed to clarify low-tone speech recognition for CC in occluded ears, and determine if excessive low-tone sound emphasis decreases maximum speech recognition scores. METHODS: Eight volunteers with normal hearing participated. The performance-intensity function and maximum speech recognition scores for CC with an earplug (i.e., occluded) and air conduction (AC) were measured under high- and low-pass filter (HPF and LPF) conditions, respectively. RESULTS: An HPF improved the maximum speech recognition scores for CC in occluded ears. The scores for CC (occluded) under the conditions of the first- and second-order HPF did not differ from that for AC under the no-filter condition. Conversely, an LPF reduced the scores for AC. The scores and confusion matrices under the second-order LPF condition were similar to those for CC (occluded). CONCLUSION: The conditions under the second-order LPF resembled those of CC in occluded ears. An HPF can compensate excessive low-tone emphasis and improve speech recognition.

Cartilage Conduction Hearing Aids for Severe Conduction Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits of a new type of hearing aid using cartilage conduction (CC) in patients with severe conduction hearing loss and evaluate its potential for practical use. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive, prospective case series. PATIENTS: Forty-one subjects (21 with bilateral aural atresia; 15 with unilateral aural atresia; and 5 others) participated in this study. INTERVENTION: Fitting and gain adjustments of the CC hearing aids were performed to the ear(s) with conduction hearing loss. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The function gains were measured. Evaluation of the measurements of speech performance-intensity functions, speech recognition scores, tolerance of environmental noise, and subject questionnaires were also performed, and judged according to the "Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting" established by the Japan Audiological Society. RESULTS: The thresholds were significantly improved by CC hearing aids. The functional gains for CC hearing aids were nearly equivalent to that for their previously used hearing aids. The style of the transducer fixation and the type of aural atresia had no significant influence on the functional gains. Most of the assessment results were judged to be sufficient. Before the trial, bone conduction hearing aids had been used most frequently by bilateral aural atresia subjects. However, after the trial, most subjects continued to use CC hearing aids instead of reverting back to their original device. Overall, 39 subjects continued use of the CC hearing aids. No severe adverse effects were noted in the trial. CONCLUSION: Cartilage conduction hearing aids could be an additional and beneficial option for severe conduction hearing loss from aural atresia.

Autocorrelation factors and intelligibility of Japanese monosyllables in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.

Some Japanese monosyllables contain consonants that are not easily discernible for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. However, the acoustic features that make these monosyllables difficult to discern have not been clearly identified. Here, this study used the autocorrelation function (ACF), which can capture temporal features of signals, to clarify the factors influencing speech intelligibility. For each monosyllable, five factors extracted from the ACF [Φ(0): total energy; τ1 and ϕ1: delay time and amplitude of the maximum peak; τe: effective duration; Wϕ(0): spectral centroid], voice onset time, speech intelligibility index, and loudness level were compared with the percentage of correctly perceived articulations (144 ears) obtained by 50 Japanese vowel and consonant-vowel monosyllables produced by one female speaker. Results showed that median effective duration [(τe)med] was strongly correlated with the percentage of correctly perceived articulations of the consonants (r = 0.87, p < 0.01). (τe)med values were computed by running ACFs with the time lag at which the magnitude of the logarithmic-ACF envelope had decayed to -10 dB. Effective duration is a measure of temporal pattern persistence, i.e., the duration over which the waveform maintains a stable pattern. The authors postulate that low recognition ability is related to degraded perception of temporal fluctuation patterns.

Perception of speech in cartilage conduction.

OBJECTIVE: By attaching a transducer to the aural cartilage a relatively loud sound is audible even with a negligibly small fixation pressure applied to the transducer. This form of conduction is referred to as cartilage conduction (CC). Utilizing CC, novel audio devices can be developed, and one possible application is a CC hearing aid. However, there are no studies on speech perception in CC. In this study, CC speech recognition performance was measured and compared with that for air and bone conduction (AC and BC, respectively). METHODS: Nine volunteers with normal hearing participated in the study. The performance-intensity functions were measured for AC, BC and CC. These measurements were performed in the conditions with and without an earplug. RESULTS: Without the earplug, no differences in speech recognition scores were observed among AC, BC, and CC. With the earplug, the level at which the maximum speech recognition score was obtained did not increase in CC, which agreed with the result of BC but not AC. The maximum speech recognition CC score decreased with the earplug. The performance-intensity functions for AC and BC shifted in parallel with the earplug. These shifts approximated the average threshold shifts. In contrast, for CC, the performance-intensity function did not shift in parallel with the earplug. As for the CC threshold shifts with the earplug, although the threshold at 500Hz decreased by 15.4dB, those at 2000 and 4000Hz increased by 13.8 and 31.1dB, respectively. Compared with AC and BC, CC excessively emphasized low over high frequency sounds when the earplug was inserted. Confusion matrices analysis demonstrated that 4%, 22%, and 74% of the errors occurred at low, intermediate, and high frequency speech sounds, respectively. Thus, this excessive low frequency sound emphasis probably prevented the recognition of high frequency speech sounds. CONCLUSION: The decrease in the maximum speech recognition score for CC with the earplug was derived from the biased frequency composition. It can be improved by frequency composition adjustment.

Effects of noise exposure on neonatal auditory brainstem response thresholds in pregnant guinea pigs at different gestational periods.

AIM: Noise exposure during pregnancy has been reported to cause fetal hearing impairment. However, little is known about the effects of noise exposure during various gestational stages on postnatal hearing. In the present study, we investigated the effects of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response (ABR) at the early, mid-, and late gestational periods in newborn guinea pigs. METHODS: Pregnant guinea pigs were exposed to 4-kHz pure tone at a 120-dB sound pressure level for 4 h. We divided the animals into four groups as follows: the control, early gestational exposure, mid-gestational exposure, and late gestational exposure groups. ABR thresholds and latencies in newborns were recorded using 1-, 2-, and 4-kHz tone burst on postnatal days 1, 7, 14, and 28. Changes in ABR thresholds and latencies were measured between the 4 × 4 and 4 × 3 factorial groups mentioned above (gestational periods × postnatal days, gestational periods × frequencies). RESULTS: The thresholds were low in the order of control group < early gestational exposure group < mid-gestational exposure group and late gestational exposure group. Noise exposure during pregnancy influenced ABR thresholds in neonatal guinea pigs. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show that noise exposure during the early, mid-, and late gestational periods significantly elevated ABR thresholds in neonatal guinea pigs.

Cartilage conduction is characterized by vibrations of the cartilaginous portion of the ear canal.

Cartilage conduction (CC) is a new form of sound transmission which is induced by a transducer being placed on the aural cartilage. Although the conventional forms of sound transmission to the cochlea are classified into air or bone conduction (AC or BC), previous study demonstrates that CC is not classified into AC or BC (Laryngoscope 124: 1214-1219). Next interesting issue is whether CC is a hybrid of AC and BC. Seven volunteers with normal hearing participated in this experiment. The threshold-shifts by water injection in the ear canal were measured. AC, BC, and CC thresholds at 0.5-4 kHz were measured in the 0%-, 40%-, and 80%-water injection conditions. In addition, CC thresholds were also measured for the 20%-, 60%-, 100%-, and overflowing-water injection conditions. The contributions of the vibrations of the cartilaginous portion were evaluated by the threshold-shifts. For AC and BC, the threshold-shifts by the water injection were 22.6-53.3 dB and within 14.9 dB at the frequency of 0.5-4 kHz, respectively. For CC, when the water was filled within the bony portion, the thresholds were elevated to the same degree as AC. When the water was additionally injected to reach the cartilaginous portion, the thresholds at 0.5 and 1 kHz dramatically decreased by 27.4 and 27.5 dB, respectively. In addition, despite blocking AC by the injected water, the CC thresholds in force level were remarkably lower than those for BC. The vibration of the cartilaginous portion contributes to the sound transmission, particularly in the low frequency range. Although the airborne sound is radiated into the ear canal in both BC and CC, the mechanism underlying its generation is different between them. CC generates airborne sound in the canal more efficiently than BC. The current findings suggest that CC is not a hybrid of AC and BC.

Cartilage conduction efficiently generates airborne sound in the ear canal.

OBJECTIVE: By attaching a transducer to the aural cartilage, a relatively loud sound is audible even with a negligibly small fixation force. Previous study has identified several pathways for sound transmission by means of cartilage conduction. This investigation focused on the relative contribution of direct vibration of the aural cartilage to sound transmission in an open and in an occluded ear. METHODS: Thresholds with and without an earplug were compared for three experimental conditions: the transducer being placed on the tragus, pretragus, and mastoid. Eight volunteers with normal hearing participated. RESULTS: The thresholds increased with distance of the transducer from the ear canal (tragus, pretragus, mastoid, in that order). The differences were statistically significant for all conditions except for the occluded ear at 4 kHz. With the earplug inserted, the thresholds for the tragus condition were most sensitive below 2 kHz, indicating a significant contribution of direct vibration of the aural cartilage. CONCLUSION: Direct vibration of the aural cartilage can enhance sound transmission. At low frequencies, cartilage conduction can deliver sound efficiently across a blockage in the ear canal. Stray airborne sound radiating from the transducer dominates cartilage conduction in the open ear at high frequencies.

An examination of the effects of broadband air-conduction masker on the speech intelligibility of speech-modulated bone-conduction ultrasound.

Ultrasound can be heard by bone-conduction, and speech-modulated bone-conducted ultrasound (BCU) delivers the speech information to the human ear. One of the recognition mechanisms is the demodulation of the signals. Because some of the profoundly deaf can also hear speech-modulated BCU, another mechanism may also contribution to the recognition of speech-modulated BCU. In this study, eight volunteers with normal hearing participated. The intelligibilities of speech-modulated BCU were measured using a numeral word list under masking conditions. Because the masker can mask the demodulated sounds, the evaluation of the masking reveals the contribution of the demodulation to the recognition of speech-modulated BCU. In the current results, the masking of speech-modulated BCU differed from that of original non-modulated speech. Although the masking shifted the recognition curve for the original speech upward, the same results were not observed for the speech-modulated BCU. The masking generated the difference in the correct answers among the words for the speech-modulated BCU. The current results suggested the importance of the envelope of the modulated ultrasonic signal to the recognition under masking condition. Both demodulation and direct ultrasonic stimulation contribute to the recognition of speech-modulated BCU for the normal hearing individuals, and the direct ultrasonic stimulation plays an important role in the recognition for the profoundly deaf.

Cartilage conduction hearing.

Sound information is known to travel to the cochlea via either air or bone conduction. However, a vibration signal, delivered to the aural cartilage via a transducer, can also produce a clearly audible sound. This type of conduction has been termed "cartilage conduction." The aural cartilage forms the outer ear and is distributed around the exterior half of the external auditory canal. In cartilage conduction, the cartilage and transducer play the roles of a diaphragm and voice coil of a loudspeaker, respectively. There is a large gap between the impedances of cartilage and skull bone, such that cartilage vibrations are not easily transmitted through bone. Thus, these methods of conduction are distinct. In this study, force was used to apply a transducer to aural cartilage, and it was found that the sound in the auditory canal was amplified, especially for frequencies below 2 kHz. This effect was most pronounced at an application force of 1 N, which is low enough to ensure comfort in the design of hearing aids. The possibility of using force adjustments to vary amplification may also have applications for cell phone design.

Sound transmission by cartilage conduction in ear with fibrotic aural atresia.

A hearing aid using cartilage conduction (CC) has been proposed as an alternative to bone conduction (BC) hearing aids. The transducer developed for this application is lightweight, requires a much smaller fixation force than a BC hearing aid, and is more convenient to use. CC can be of great benefit to patients with fibrotic aural atresia. Fibrotic tissue connected to the ossicles provides an additional pathway (termed fibrotic tissue pathway) for sound to reach the cochlea by means of CC. To address the function of fibrotic tissue pathway, BC and CC thresholds were measured in six ears with fibrotic aural atresia. The relationship between the CC thresholds and the results of computed tomography was investigated. In the ears with the presence of a fibrotic tissue pathway, the CC thresholds were lower than the BC thresholds at 0.5 and 1.0 kHz. At 2.0 kHz, no significant difference was observed between the BC and CC thresholds. The current findings suggest that sound in the low to middle frequency range is transmitted more efficiently by CC via a fibrotic tissue pathway than BC. The development of hearing devices using CC can contribute to rehabilitation, particularly in patients with fibrotic aural atresia.