Elderly patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in and out of intensive care units: a comparative, prospective study of 579 ventilations.

INTRODUCTION: Many mechanically ventilated elderly patients in Israel are treated outside of intensive care units (ICUs). The decision as to whether these patients should be treated in ICUs is reached without clear guidelines. We therefore conducted a study with the aim of identifying triage criteria and factors associated with in-hospital mortality in this population. METHODS: All mechanically invasive ventilated elderly (65+) medical patients in the hospital were included in a prospective, non-interventional, observational study. RESULTS: Of the 579 ventilations, 283 (48.9%) were done in ICUs compared with 296 (51.1%) in non-ICU wards. The percentage of ICU ventilations in the 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85+ age groups was 62%, 45%, and 23%, respectively. The decision to ventilate in ICUs was significantly and independently influenced by age (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.945, P < 0.001), and pre-hospitalization functional status by functional independence measure (FIM) scale (OR = 1.054, P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was 53.0% in ICUs compared with 68.2% in non-ICU wards (P < 0.001), but the rate was not independently and significantly affected by hospitalization in ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: In Israel, most elderly patients are ventilated outside ICUs and the percentage of ICU ventilations decreases as age increases. In our study groups, the lower mortality among elderly patients ventilated in ICUs is related to patient characteristics and not to their treatment in ICUs per se. Although the milieu in which this study was conducted is uncommon today in the western world, its findings point to possible means of managing future situations in which the demand for mechanical ventilation of elderly patients exceeds the supply of intensive care beds. Moreover, the findings of this study can contribute to the search for ways to reduce costs without having a negative effect on outcome in ventilated elderly patients.

Respiratory viruses in adults with community-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Use of nucleic acid amplification techniques has increased the identification of respiratory viruses (RVs) in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The objectives of the present study were to identify RV in patients with CAP using three different sampling methods and to compare CAP virus proportions and types with two comparison groups. METHODS: The study population included 183 adult patients with CAP, 450 control subjects, and 201 patients with nonpneumonic lower respiratory tract infection (NPLRTI). Each participant was sampled by oropharyngeal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, and nasopharyngeal washing, and the samples were tested for detection of 12 RVs by multiplex TaqMan Hydrolysis probe-based real-time polymerase chain reaction (Integrated DNA Technology; Coralville, IA). RESULTS: At least one RV was identified in 58 patients with CAP (31.7%) compared with 32 (7.1%) in control subjects and 104 (51.7%) in patients with NPLRTI (P < .01 and P < .01, respectively). Coronaviruses were identified in 24 (13.1%) patients with CAP, compared with 17 (3.8%) in control subjects, and 21 (10.4%) patients with NPLRTI. Respiratory syncytial virus was identified in 13 (7.1%), four (0.9%), and seven (3.5%); rhinovirus in nine (4.9%), nine (2.0%), and 15 (7.5%); and influenza virus in eight (4.4%), two (0.4%), and 63 (31.3%) patients with CAP, control subjects, and patients with NPLRTI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of RV involvement in CAP is higher than previously reported. The proportion of RV identified in healthy subjects is significantly lower than in CAP, but it is not zero and should be weighed when interpreting corresponding proportions among patients.

Identification of respiratory viruses in adults: nasopharyngeal versus oropharyngeal sampling.

The optimal method for identifying respiratory viruses in adults has not been established. The objective of the study was to compare the sensitivities of three sampling methods for this purpose. One thousand participants (mean age, 63.1 +/- 17.8 years) were included. Of these, 550 were patients hospitalized for acute febrile lower respiratory tract infections and 450 were controls. Oropharyngeal swabs (OPS), nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), and nasopharyngeal washings (NPW) were obtained from each participant and were tested for 12 respiratory viruses by a multiplex hydrolysis probes-based quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Patients were defined as positive for a specific virus if the virus was identified by at least one sampling method. In all, 251 viruses were identified in 244 participants. For the detection of any virus, the sensitivity rates for OPS, NPS, and NPW were 54.2%, 73.3%, and 84.9%, respectively (for OPS versus NPS and NPW, P < 0.00001; for NPS versus NPW, P < 0.003). Maximal sensitivity was obtained only with sampling by all three methods. The same gradation of sensitivity for the three sampling methods was found when influenza viruses, coronaviruses, and rhinoviruses were analyzed separately. The three sampling methods yielded equal sensitivity rates for respiratory syncytial virus. We conclude that nasopharyngeal sampling has a higher rate of sensitivity than oropharyngeal sampling and that the use of NPW has a higher rate of sensitivity than the use of NPS with a rigid cotton swab for the identification of respiratory viruses in adults. Sampling by all three methods is required for the maximal detection of respiratory viruses.

How do older ventilated patients fare? A survival/functional analysis of 641 ventilations.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of mechanical ventilation in elderly patients should be evaluated by integrating survival rates with functional state over time after the ventilation episode. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to measure the survival rate and functional state of elderly ventilated patients and to present an integrated analysis of both outcome measures. METHODS: This is a prospective observational, noninterventional study of 641 invasive medical ventilations of elderly (65+ years) patients in medical wards and intensive care units. The functional state, by the Functional Independence Measure scale, was measured before hospitalization, at discharge from the hospital, and 1 year later. RESULTS: Survival rates at the end of hospitalization and 3, 6, and 12 months later were 33%, 28%, 25%, and 22%, respectively. According to a combined survival/functional analysis, only 11% of all ventilated elderly patients were doing well (Functional Independence Measure scale score, >or=90) a year after the hospitalization. The rates for this condition ranged from 23% for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to 0% for stroke and hospital-acquired pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients treated with mechanical ventilation, the outcomes in the period immediately after ventilation and later on are poor. In this group of patients, functional outcomes should be integrated with survival analysis for a meaningful assessment of the outcomes of treatment with mechanical ventilation to provide patients, families, practitioners, and society with reliable information on which life or death decisions can be based.

Naso- and oropharyngeal potential respiratory pathogens in adults with nonpneumonic lower respiratory tract infection.

The objective of this prospective study was to determine positive isolation rates for potential respiratory pathogens (PRPs) in the naso- and oropharynx of adults hospitalized for nonpneumonic lower respiratory tract infection (NPLRTI), compared with patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and healthy controls. The study population was 315 non-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease adults hospitalized with febrile lower respiratory tract infection (158 NPLRTI and 157 CAP) and 450 control subjects. Each participant was sampled by oropharyngeal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, and nasopharyngeal washings that were tested by conventional bacteriologic methods to identify PRP. At least 1 of the samples was positive for at least 1 of the 3 PRP bacteria in 55 NPLRTI patients (35%) compared with 51 CAP patients (33%) (NS) and 100 controls (22%) (P = 0.003 compared with NPLRTI and P = 0.02 compared with CAP). Samples were positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae in 14 NPLRTI patients (9%) compared with 29 CAP patients (19%) (P = 0.02) and 16 controls (4%) (NPLRTI P = 0.015, CAP P < 0.0001). The corresponding rates for Haemophilus influenzae were 23 (15%), 16 (10%), and 60 (13%) (NS for all 3 comparisons), and for Moraxella catarrhalis, 28 (18%), 25 (16%), and 48 (11%), respectively (NPLRTI versus controls, P = 0.03, NS other comparisons). We conclude that the rate of positive naso/oropharyngeal isolates for at least 1 of the 3 PRP bacteria in NPLRTI patients is similar to the corresponding rates for CAP patients and is higher in both groups than in controls.