Getting the drop on Staphylococcus aureus: Semiquantitative Staphylococcus aureus nasal colony reduction in orthopedic surgery reduces surgical site infection.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a frequent health care-associated infection. We aimed to reduce SSI risk after joint arthroplasty and spine surgery by reducing Staphylococcus aureus colonization burden with presurgery intranasal povidone-iodine (PVP-I) application in conjunction with skin antisepsis ("the intervention"). METHODS: Retrospective case-control study; postintervention cohort versus a historical cohort. Adults who underwent joint arthroplasty or spine surgery during February 2018 through October 2021 ("post-intervention cohort") included. In the analysis cases any patient who underwent surgery and developed SSI within 90 days postsurgery, controls had no SSI. Postintervention cohort data were compared with a similar retrospective 2016 to 2017 patient cohort that did not use intranasal PVP-I. RESULTS: The postintervention cohort comprised 688 consecutive patients aged 65y/o, 48.8% male, 28 cases, and 660 controls. Relatively more cases than controls had diabetes mellitus (P = .019). There was a 39.6% eradication rate of S aureus nasal colonization post intranasal PVP-I (P < .0001). SSI rate was higher in patients positive versus those negative for S aureus on a 24-hour postsurgery nasal culture (P < .0001). The deep SSI rate per 100 operations postintervention versus the historical cohort decreased for all surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Semiquantitative S aureus nasal colony reduction using intranasal PVP-I is effective for decreasing SSI rate in joint arthroplasty and spine surgery. In patients with presurgery S aureus nasal colonization additional intranasal PVP-I postsurgery application should be considered.

[IMPACT OF CLINICAL PHARMACIST CONSULTATIONS ON RATE OF COMPLICATIONS, RE-HOSPITALIZATIONS AND MORTALITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING BARIATRIC SURGERY].

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are prone to changes in absorption, improvement in their chronic diseases and other pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic alteration which can affect continuation and the required doses of their chronic medications. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of a clinical pharmacist's consultation on the rate of complications, re-hospitalizations and mortality among patients who underwent bariatric surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, results of bariatric patients who were consulted by a clinical pharmacist between the years 2013-2019 were compared with the results of a wider group of bariatric patients with chronic diseases who were recorded in the Israeli General Bariatric Registry during the same years. The intervention cohort included bariatric patients members of Clalit Health Services, who were treated at the Herzliya Medical Center and who were identified by the treating staff as complex cases requiring drug counseling. The primary outcomes measured in the study included: rates of surgical complications, re-hospitalizations, and death up to one year after surgery. RESULTS: The intervention group included 165 patients; the 12 month rate of re-hospitalization in the intervention group was 10.9% vs. 19.5% in the comparison group (p=0.005). The rate of documented postoperative complications was 2.7% vs. 3.9% (p=0.462) and mortality was null vs. 0.16%. CONCLUSIONS: Although the intervention population was identified in advance as more complex in terms of age and background morbidity, the rate of re-hospitalization and mortality was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the general bariatric surgery population in Israel. These results demonstrate the importance of referring to a specialized clinical pharmacist around bariatric surgery for improving patient safety, especially in complex patients.

Can Consultation by a Clinical Pharmacist Prevent Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery?

The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of clinical pharmacist consultation on the long-term morbidity and mortality outcomes among patients undergoing bariatric surgery. In this retrospective cohort study, 165 bariatric patients at Herzliya Medical Center who were identified as complex cases and were consulted by a clinical pharmacist (2013-2019) were compared with a wider group of bariatric patients with chronic diseases who were recorded in the Israeli General Bariatric Registry during the same years. The primary outcomes were rates of surgical complications, re-hospitalizations, and death up to one year after surgery. The secondary outcome was the rate of re-hospitalizations in different time periods. The twelve (12)-month rate of re-hospitalization in the intervention group was 10.9% vs. 19.5% in the comparison group (p = 0.005); the rate of documented postoperative complications was 2.7% vs. 3.9% (p = 0.462), and mortality was null vs. 0.16%, respectively. As for the secondary outcomes, the rates of re-hospitalizations in the periods of 0-30, 31-90, 91-180, and 181-365 days after surgery were 1.8% vs. 5.3% (p = 0.046), 2.4% vs. 4.1% (p = 0.278), 3.6% vs. 4.8% (p = 0.476), and 7.3% vs. 9.9% (p = 0.256) in the intervention vs. comparison cohorts, respectively. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the importance and benefit of referring to a specialized clinical pharmacist around bariatric surgery for improving patient safety, especially in complex patients. This is the first study to look at the long-term effects of clinical pharmacist consultation on re-hospitalization and mortality among bariatric patients, and our encouraging outcomes should hopefully stimulate more studies to show the invaluable role of specialized clinical pharmacists.

Multifaceted Strategy Improves Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized with a Diabetic Foot Infection.

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are associated with major morbidity, reduced quality of life and increased mortality. Osteomyelitis is a leading cause of lower-extremity amputation in diabetic patients. We aimed to examine whether a multifaceted strategy for treating hospitalized patients with a DFI effectively influenced microbiological culture results and outcomes. A retrospective cohort-study in a 1100-bed, tertiary-care university hospital was conducted. Adult patients with a DFI admitted to the orthopedics department between 2015 and 2019 were included. During the pre-intervention period (2015-2016), one general orthopedic department was in operation. In the post-intervention period (2017-2019), a second department was created with a designated "complicated wound unit". The multifaceted strategy included revising local guidelines for DFI culturing emphasizing bone cultures, correct sample handling, and adjusting antibiotic treatment to culture results. Additionally, a weekly multidisciplinary-team grand round was instigated and post-discharge outpatient follow-up was scheduled. 652 patients with DFIs were included; 101 during the pre-intervention period and 551 during the post-intervention period. Compared to the pre-intervention, during the post-intervention period mainly bone or deep-tissue cultures were performed (9.7% vs. 98.2%, P < 0.001). Bacteriology cultures in the pre-intervention versus post-intervention period revealed: among staphylococcus isolates, fewer methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus detected (20.4% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.010); within Enterobacteriaceae isolates, fewer extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing bacteria detected (51.6% vs. 23.6%, P < 0.001); a decrease in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (28% vs. 10.6%, P < 0.001) and an increase in anaerobic bacterial isolates (0 vs. 11.1%, P < 0.001). On multivariate regression, the post-intervention period (ie multifaceted strategy) was a protective measure against readmissions (P = 0.007 OR 0.50 95% CI 0.30-0.82). We conclude that our interventive multifaceted strategy led to accurate bacterial diagnosis, de-escalation of antibiotic treatment and readmission reduction.

Impact of an Antibiotic Stewardship Program on the Incidence of Resistant Escherichia coli: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria increase hospitalizations and mortality rates; antibiotic pressure increases resistance rates. We evaluated the impact of the antibiotics stewardship program (ASP) on Escherichia coli resistance rates, evaluating all antibiotic use and patients with positive cultures hospitalized between 2011 and 2018. Data on antibiotics were collected quarterly as the defined daily dose (DDD)/100 days hospitalization. In 2014, an intervention was introduced, targeting the reduction of overall antibiotic use as well as specifically targeting quinolones and other broad-spectrum antibiotics. Using interrupted time series analysis (ITS), we compared the rates and trends of antibiotic use and resistant E. coli. We included 6001 patients, 3182 pre-ASP and 2819 post-ASP. We observed significant changes in absolute numbers as well as in trends for use of DDD/100 days of all antibiotics by 31% from 76 to 52, and by 52% from 10.4 to 4.9 for quinolones. ITS demonstrated that before the ASP intervention, there was a slope pattern for increased E. coli resistance to antibiotics. This slope was reversed following the intervention for quinolones -1.52, aminoglycosides -2.04, and amoxicillin clavulanate (amox/clav) -1.76; the effect of the intervention was observed as early as three months after the intervention and continued to decrease over time until the end of the study, at 48 months. We conclude that the ASP can positively impact the resistance rate of Gram-negative infections over time, regardless of the targeted combination of antibiotics, if the overall use is reduced.

The Kinetics of an Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the kinetics and different phases of a successful antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) intervention. METHODS: We analyzed the trends of quarterly antibiotic use measured in defined daily dose (DDD)/100 days hospitalization using the Joinpoint Regression Program and interrupted time series analysis to objectively identify shifts in the trends of antibiotic use. We correlated these changes in trends with the introduction of a hospital-wide ASP intervention. RESULTS: The ASP intervention reduced the overall antibiotic use by 33%, from a prior steady state of 76.5 DDD/100 days hospitalization to a post-intervention steady state of 51.2 DDD/100 days hospitalization (p < 0.001). We identified four distinct phases in the trends: prior steady state (A), early intervention (B), accelerated phase (C), and post steady state (D). From A to B a change of slope (-1.46) [SE 0.37, 95% CI -2.23, -0.69 (p = 0.002)]; B to C, a further decrease of slope (-4.70) [SE 0.64, 95% CI -6.03, -3.37 (p = 0.001)]; between periods C and D, straightening out of the slope (+ 6.84) [SE 0.55, 95% CI 5.70, 7.98 (p < 0.001)] to a new post-intervention steady state. It took 1.5 years after completion of the intervention to reach the new steady state. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that ASP interventions require time to achieve the maximal effect. Successful interventions require physicians to adapt new prescribing behaviors and gain confidence in the change; this adaptation can be a prolonged process and might even take years after the introduction of the ASP. These factors should be considered when planning and implementing ASP interventions.

The impact of a multimodel approach to designing a new orthopedic department.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multifaceted approach effectively influenced antibiotic use in an orthopedics department. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study comparing the readmission rate and antibiotic use before and after an intervention. SETTING: A 1,000-bed, tertiary-care, university hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to the orthopedics department between January 2015 and December 2018. METHODS: During the preintervention period (2015-2016), 1 general orthopedic department was in operation. In the postintervention period (2017-2018), 2 separate departments were created: one designated for elective "clean" surgeries and another that included a "complicated wound" unit. A multifaceted strategy including infection prevention measures and introducing antibiotic stewardship practices was implemented. Admission rates, hand hygiene practice compliance, surgical site infections, and antibiotic treatment before versus after the intervention were analyzed. RESULTS: The number of admissions and hospitalization days in the 2 periods did not change. Seven-day readmissions per annual quarter decreased significantly from the preintervention period (median, 7 days; interquartile range [IQR], 6-9) to the postintervention period (median, 4 days; IQR, 2-7; P = .038). Hand hygiene compliance increased and surgical site infections decreased in the postintervention period. Although total antibiotic use was not reduced, there was a significant change in the breakdown of the different antibiotic classes used before and after the intervention: increased use of narrow-spectrum ß-lactams (P < .001) and decreased use of ß-lactamase inhibitors (P < .001), third-generation cephalosporins (P = .044), and clindamycin (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Restructuring the orthopedics department facilitated better infection prevention measures accompanied by antibiotic stewardship implementation, resulting in a decreased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and a significant reduction in readmission rates.

Risk factors and outcomes of patients colonized with carbapenemase-producing and non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

OBJECTIVE: To compare risk factors and outcome of patients colonized with carbapenemase-producing (CP) carbapenem-resistant Enterobactereaceae (CRE) and non-CP-CRE. DESIGN: A comparative historical study. SETTING: A 1,000-bed tertiary-care university hospital. PATIENTS: Adults with CP-CRE positive rectal swab cultures, non-CP-CRE positive rectal swab cultures, and negative rectal swab cultures (non-CRE). METHODS: CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE colonized adult patients versus patients not colonized with CRE hospitalized during 24 months were included. We identified patients retrospectively through the microbiology laboratory, and we reviewed their files for demographics, underlying diseases, Charlson Index, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: This study included 447 patients for whom a rectal swab for CRE was obtained: 147 positive for CP-CRE, 147 positive for non-CP-CRE, and 147 negative for both. Patients with CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE versus no CRE more frequently resided in nursing homes (P<0.001), received antibiotics 3 months prior to admission (P < .001), and received glucocorticosteroids 3 months prior to admission (P = .047 and P < .001, respectively). Risk factors unique for non-CP-CRE versus CP-CRE colonization included mechanical ventilation and patient movement between hospital departments. Non-CP-CRE was a predictor for mechanical ventilation 2.5 that of CP-CRE colonization. In-hospital mortality was highest among non-CP-CRE-colonized patients. On COX multivariate regression for mortality prediction age, Charlson index and steroid treatment 3 months before admission influenced mortality (P = .027, P = .023, and P = .013, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Overlapping and unique risk factors are associated with CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE colonization. Non-CP-CRE colonized patients had a higher in-hospital mortality rate.