Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Korean J Ophthalmol ; 35(4): 261-271, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34162193

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of selective intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). METHODS: Medical records for 44 eyes of 44 patients diagnosed with acute non-arteritic CRAO and thrombolysis between October 2010 and February 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Based on visual acuity, fundoscopic findings, and fluorescein angiography, the patients were classified into three stages: incomplete, subtotal, and total. The perfusion state using the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), arm to retina time, and arteriovenous passage times, after 1 month, 6 months, and at the final visit after the procedure, were compared with baseline readings. RESULTS: Improvement of visual acuity was confirmed in 31 out of 44 patients (70.45%). The mean BCVA of 44 patients changed from 1.65 ± 0.78 logarithmic minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at the first visit to 1.18 ± 0.91 logMAR at the last visit (p = 0.114). The BCVA according to CRAO stage was 0.08 ± 0.11 logMAR for the incomplete stage at the first visit, 0.06 ± 0.05 logMAR (p = 0.933) 1 month after the procedure, and 0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR (p = 0.933) at the last visit. In the subtotal stage, the results were 1.81 ± 0.54 logMAR at the first visit, 1.63 ± 0.76 logMAR (p = 0.035) 1 month after the procedure, and 1.36 ± 0.85 logMAR (p = 0.014) at the last visit. For the total stage of BCVA, the result at the first visit was 2.36 ± 0.25 logMAR, and it was 2.30 ± 0.30 logMAR (p = 0.510) 1 month after the procedure, and 2.42 ± 0.30 logMAR (p = 0.642) at the last visit. Reperfusion was observed in 40 patients out of the 44 (90.91%). CONCLUSIONS: Selective intra-arterial thrombolysis can be helpful in patients with subtotal CRAO in terms of visual improvement and retinal arterial reperfusion.


Subject(s)
Retinal Artery Occlusion , Fluorescein Angiography , Humans , Retina , Retinal Artery Occlusion/diagnosis , Retinal Artery Occlusion/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Thrombolytic Therapy
2.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 14: 1609-1618, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32606576

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To analyze the effects on microaneurysm (MA) and perifoveal perfusion in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) patients with macular edema (ME) after early intensive treatment using intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospectively, 25 eyes of 25 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with ME were included between August 2016 and February 2019. For 6 months, patients were administered 0.5-mg IVR injections monthly. Ocular evaluation, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart), central retinal thickness (CRT; using optical coherence tomography), fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography, was performed for all participants. Results obtained at baseline were compared to those observed after 6 months. RESULTS: Mean BCVA increased significantly from 67.6±3.29 letters at baseline to 76.36±1.61 letters after 6 months (P=0.002) of IVR therapy. CRT decreased significantly from 479.12±16.66 µm at baseline to 369.12±13.02 µm at 6 months. Similarly, the total number of MAs decreased significantly from 5.68±3.41 to 1.60±1.73 (P<0.0001). MA turnover, calculated by adding the MA formation rate to the MA disappearance rate (both calculated as MA number/month) also decreased significantly from 6.88±3.83 to 1.92±1.75 after treatment (P<0.0001). Perifoveal non-perfused area decreased from 2.517±0.456 mm2 at baseline to 2.495±0.293 mm2 at 6 months, but the results were not statistically significant (P=0.954). CONCLUSION: Treatment with early intensive IVR therapy in NPDR patients with ME not only improved BCVA and CRT but also decreased MA turnover. However, in the study period of 6 months, IVR therapy did not show significant improvement in perifoveal non-perfused area.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...