ABSTRACT
Objective The current study investigated whether or not patients taking multiple daily oral medications for lifestyle-related chronic diseases would have positive perspectives on changing one of their medications to a once-weekly one. Methods A total of 1,071 Japanese outpatients participated in the current study. We performed a questionnaire-based survey and compared the current satisfaction with the ongoing daily oral treatment (current daily-only treatment) and an expected satisfaction with an imaginary oral treatment changing one of their daily oral medications to a once-weekly oral medication (imaginary daily-and-weekly treatment). Results Medications were taken for diabetes mellitus in 72% of the patients, for dyslipidemia in 54%, and for circulatory diseases, including hypertension, in 73%. Compared to their satisfaction with the current daily-only treatment, an expected satisfaction with the imaginary daily-and-weekly treatment was on average significantly attenuated (p<0.001, effect size d=0.49). The prevalence of a higher satisfaction score for the imaginary daily-and-weekly treatment versus the current daily-only treatment was 30% in the overall population. The prevalence was 59%, 40%, 29%, 14%, and 8% in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th quintile of the satisfaction score with the current daily-only treatment (p<0.001 for trend). Conclusion Treatment satisfaction would be on average attenuated if one of the multiple daily oral medications was changed to a once-weekly one. Improvement in the satisfaction was less expected in the subgroup that was more satisfied with the current daily-only treatment.
Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Administration, Oral , Aged , Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Drug Administration Schedule , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypolipidemic Agents/administration & dosage , Life Style , Male , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
We investigated whether 10 mg per day of azilsartan, one-half of the normal dosage, would be non-inferior to 8 mg per day of candesartan cilexetil for controlling blood pressure in Japanese patients with hypertension. In this open-label, randomized, crossover trial, 309 hypertensive Japanese adults treated with 8-mg candesartan cilexetil were randomized into two arms and received either 10-mg azilsartan or 8-mg candesartan cilexetil in a crossover manner. The primary efficacy outcome was systolic blood pressure, and the margin of non-inferiority was set to be 2.5 mm Hg. The participants were 67±11 years old, and 180 (58%) were male. The baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were 127.1±13.2 and 69.7±11.2 mm Hg, respectively. During the study period, the difference in systolic blood pressure between the treatments with 10-mg azilsartan and 8-mg candesartan cilexetil was -1.7 mm Hg, with the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) ranged from -3.2 to -0.2 mm Hg. The upper boundary of the 95% CI was below the margin of 2.5 mm Hg, confirming the non-inferiority of 10-mg azilsartan to 8-mg candesartan cilexetil. The difference also reached significance (P=0.037). The corresponding difference in diastolic blood pressure was -1.4 (95% CI: -2.4 to -0.4) mm Hg (P=0.006). Treatment with 10-mg azilsartan was similar to 8-mg candesartan cilexetil in its association with rare adverse events. In conclusion, 10-mg azilsartan was non-inferior to 8-mg candesartan cilexetil for controlling systolic blood pressure in Japanese hypertensive patients already being treated with 8-mg candesartan cilexetil.
