Multicenter evaluation of the addition of eltrombopag to immunosuppressive therapy for adults with severe aplastic anemia.

Eltrombopag has been shown to improve response rates when added to standard therapy in adults with severe aplastic anemia in controlled trial settings. However, outcomes in real-world populations have mostly been examined in small retrospective studies. This robust, multicenter, retrospective cohort study across six academic health systems compared outcomes in patients who received immunosuppressive therapy with or without eltrombopag. The study included 82 patients who received front-line therapy from January 2014 to August 2021. Overall response rates at 6 months did not differ significantly for patients receiving eltrombopag versus immunosuppressive therapy alone (58% v. 65%, p = 0.56). However, complete response rates at 6 and 12 months were over two times higher in the eltrombopag arm (29% v. 12%, p = 0.06 and 48% v. 18%, p = 0.005). Rates of hepatotoxicity were similar across both arms. Eltrombopag addition did not impact overall survival (median not reached in either arm at 2 years, p = 0.86) or disease-free survival (median not reached v. 13.3 months at 2 years, p = 0.20). Eltrombopag may not produce as large of a benefit in real-world settings compared to controlled trial settings but may offer patients deeper responses with similar rates of toxicity to immunosuppressive therapy alone.

Lurbinectedin: A New Treatment Option for Relapsed/Refractory Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical application of lurbinectedin and its role in the therapy of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). DATA SOURCES: PubMed database and ClincialTrials.gov were utilized to perform a comprehensive literature search from August 2011 to mid-November 2020 with the terms lurbinectedin and PM01183. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English-language clinical trials of lurbinectedin were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Lurbinectedin, as second-line therapy in SCLC, demonstrated an overall response (OR) rate of 35.2% and median overall survival of 9.3 months. Phase II studies in multiple cancers revealed myelosuppression (>95%), increased liver enzymes (>70%), nausea (up to 80%), vomiting (54%), and fatigue (>50%) as the most common adverse events associated with lurbinectedin. CYP3A4 drug interactions affect lurbinectedin exposure (severe pancytopenia occurred after coadministration with aprepitant), and protein binding can affect its clearance. Patients with cardiac comorbidities were not included in published lurbinectedin trials because of cardiotoxicity associated with trabectedin. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Lurbinectedin is an option in SCLC after failure of a platinum-based regimen. Dose adjustments, drug interactions, antiemetic regimen choice, and patient comorbidities are important clinical considerations with lurbinectedin use. Likewise, its place in therapy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors requires further exploration. CONCLUSIONS: With a promising OR compared with other second-line options, lurbinectedin should be considered in patients who have failed first-line therapy. Studies are ongoing with lurbinectedin in combination with other agents in SCLC, and a phase III trial is assessing use in combination with doxorubicin compared with other second-line regimens.