Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Athl Train ; 50(1): 65-70, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25310247

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a valid, reliable, and self-reported outcome instrument for the foot and ankle region. OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence for translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Japanese version of the FAAM (FAAM-J). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Collegiate athletic training/sports medicine clinical setting. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-three collegiate athletes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): All participants completed the Activities of Daily Living and Sports subscales of the FAAM-J and the Physical Functioning and Mental Health subscales of the Japanese version of the Short Form-36v2 (SF-36). Also, 19 participants (23%) whose conditions were expected to be stable completed another FAAM-J 2 to 6 days later for test-retest reliability. We analyzed the scores of those subscales for convergent and divergent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The Activities of Daily Living and Sports subscales of the FAAM-J had correlation coefficients of 0.86 and 0.75, respectively, with the Physical Functioning section of the SF-36 for convergent validity. For divergent validity, the correlation coefficients with Mental Health of the SF-36 were 0.29 and 0.27 for each subscale, respectively. Cronbach α for internal consistency was 0.99 for the Activities of Daily Living and 0.98 for the Sports subscale. A 95% confidence interval with a single measure was ±8.1 and ±14.0 points for each subscale. The test-retest reliability measures revealed intraclass correlation coefficient values of 0.87 for the Activities of Daily Living and 0.91 for the Sports subscales with minimal detectable changes of ±6.8 and ±13.7 for the respective subscales. CONCLUSIONS: The FAAM was successfully translated for a Japanese version, and the FAAM-J was adapted cross-culturally. Thus, the FAAM-J can be used as a self-reported outcome measure for Japanese-speaking individuals; however, the scores must be interpreted with caution, especially when applied to different populations and other types of injury than those included in this study.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Ankle Injuries/rehabilitation , Foot Injuries/rehabilitation , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adolescent , Ankle , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Japan , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Reproducibility of Results , Self Report , Sports Medicine/methods , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...