Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 154(5): 629-638, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30384933

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to compare the load systems produced by rectangular loops and continuous arch mechanics on intrusion of a maxillary second molar. METHODS: An orthodontic appliance was passively bonded from second molar to second molar on a patient's model fixed to an orthodontic force tester. The second molars were extruded by 3 mm, and 2 mechanics systems were compared: beta-titanium rectangular loops and super-elastic nickel-titanium continuous arch. Vertical (Fz) and mesial (Fy) forces, and tipping moments around the buccal axis (Mx) at the tubes were collected at every 0.5 mm of deactivation. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to detect differences between mechanics. The net Mx was also estimated at the center of resistance of each molar. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the mechanics at the tubes, except for the Mx in the first molar, and more importantly, at the centers of resistance of the molars: Fz forces were greater in the continuous arch than in the rectangular loops, which, on the other hand, produced lower Fy forces than the continuous arch. In the second molar, net Mx was low initially and changed with deactivation. In the continuous arch, net Mx decreased from -3.6 N.mm of mesial crown tipping to clinically insignificant levels after 2 mm of deactivation. In the first molar, net Mx was lower on the rectangular loop than on the continuous arch during the first 2 mm of deactivation and became similar in the last millimeter of deactivation. Additionally, the net Mx decreased with deactivation with both mechanics. CONCLUSIONS: Both mechanics can intrude the second molars. Although the rectangular loop produced less tipping in large deflections, the continuous arch was a better approach when less intrusion was required.


Subject(s)
Molar/pathology , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Orthodontic Wires , Tooth Movement Techniques/instrumentation , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Humans , Malocclusion/therapy , Models, Anatomic , Nickel , Titanium
2.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 153(3): 396-404, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29501115

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this research was to compare the load systems produced by rectangular loops and continuous arches for the correction of extruded second molars with a mesial inclination (inconsistent system) and a distal inclination (consistent system). METHODS: The maxillary first molar of an acrylic model of a patient, with passive brackets and tubes bonded, was connected to a 3-dimensional load cell of an orthodontic force tester, and the second molar was replaced by its respective tube bonded to a second load cell. The second molar tube was moved 2.5 mm occlusally and tipped 20° mesially and distally, creating an inconsistent force system and a consistent force system. For each situation, ten 0.017 × 0.025-in beta-titanium, 8 × 10-mm rectangular loops were compared with 10 0.014-in nickel-titanium continuous arches. The vertical forces-F(z)-and tipping moments-M(x)-were compared using 4 t tests, at 5%. RESULTS: In the inconsistent group, the rectangular loop produced a larger M(x) in both molars: 2.11 N.mm in the second molar compared with the -0.15 N.mm of the continuous arches. On the first molar, the rectangular loops produced -5.58 N.mm against -2.08 N.mm produced by the continuous arches. The F(z) values produced at the second molar with each system were similar, whereas on the first molar they were different; the rectangular loops produced 0.41N, and continuous arches produced 0.53N. In the consistent group, the rectangular loops produced smaller M(x) values at the second molar (-3.06 N.mm) than did the continuous arch (-4.25 N.mm) (P = 0.01), as well as a smaller F(z) value (-0.52 vs -0.92 N, respectively). At the first molar, the rectangular loops produced smaller M(x) values (-2.32 N.mm) than did the continuous arch (-4.18 N.mm), as well as a smaller F(z) value (0.59 vs 1.10 N). CONCLUSIONS: In the inconsistent group, only the rectangular loop produced a system of force that could correct the second molar. In the consistent system, both group mechanics produced a system of force compatible with the correction of the second molar, but the continuous wire produced larger moments. Both groups showed a tendency for mesial crown tipping of the first molar.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion/therapy , Molar/pathology , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Orthodontic Wires , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Dental Stress Analysis , Humans , Maxilla , Models, Dental , Orthodontic Brackets , Software
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...