Re-engineering primary healthcare in Kerala.

INTRODUCTION: In the backdrop of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the state of Kerala, India, revamped its existing primary health centres (PHCs) into people-friendly family health centres (FHCs) in order to provide comprehensive primary care as part of a mission-based ('Aardram') initiative. It was envisioned that the mission's implementation and operation would make use of decentralised governance. The present study explored how the decentralised governance influenced reorganisation of primary care. METHODS: The study adopted an exploratory approach using qualitative methods: key informant interviews (n = 8), in-depth interviews (n = 20) and document reviews. Thematic analysis was done following deductive coding and the themes that emerged were organised under a schema. RESULTS: The results could be summarised under five overarching themes. Strong political commitment, combined with bureaucratic competence, facilitated implementation and functioning of 'Aardram' primary care. The insights developed through multi-sectoral training helped local governments (LGs) get involve and engage with the health system as a team in order to plan and implement interventions. The decentralised governance structures enabled re-engineering of PHCs by mobilisation of financial resources, provision of human resources, infrastructure modification, and enhanced community participation at various levels. Non-uniformity of commitment, sub-optimal engagement of urban LGs and issues of sustainability and monitoring were the shortcomings observed. CONCLUSION: Decentralised governance played a positive role in the re-engineering of PHCs, which was utilised as a platform to demonstrate best practices in health governance through a participatory approach. The importance of empowering LGs through capacity building to address challenges in achieving primary care SDGs is highlighted in this study.

INTRODUCTION: Dans le contexte des Objectifs de développement durable (SDG), l'État du Kérala, Inde, a transformé ses centres de soins primaires (PHC) existants en centres de santé familiale (FHC) conviviaux afin de fournir des soins primaires complets dans le cadre d'une initiative mandatée en mission ('Aardram'). Il était prévu que la mise en œuvre et le fonctionnement de cette mission fassent appel à la gouvernance décentralisée. Cette étude a examiné l'influence de la gouvernance décentralisée sur la réorganisation des soins primaires. MÉTHODES: L'étude a eu recours à une approche exploratoire, en utilisant des méthodes qualitatives : entretiens avec des informateurs clés (n=8), entretiens approfondis (n=20) et analyses documentaires. Une analyse thématique a été réalisée selon un codage déductif et les thèmes identifiés ont été structurés sous forme de schéma. RÉSULTATS: Les résultats peuvent être résumés en cinq thèmes principaux. Un engagement politique fort, associé à des compétences bureaucratiques, ont facilité la mise en œuvre et le fonctionnement des soins primaires de la mission 'Aardram'. Les connaissances acquises grâce à la formation multisectorielle ont aidé les gouvernements locaux (LG) à s'impliquer et à s'engager dans le système de santé en tant qu'équipe afin de planifier et de mettre en place des interventions. Les structures de gouvernance décentralisées ont permis de réorganiser les PHC en mobilisant des ressources financières, en fournissant des ressources humaines, en modifiant les infrastructures et en renforçant la participation communautaire à différents niveaux. Parmi les lacunes observées figurent le manque d'uniformité de l'engagement, l'engagement sous-optimal des LG urbains et les questions de durabilité et de suivi. CONCLUSION: La gouvernance décentralisée a joué un rôle positif dans la réorganisation des PHC, qui a été utilisée comme une plateforme pour illustrer les bonnes pratiques en matière de gouvernance sanitaire par le biais d'une approche participative. Cette étude met en évidence l'importance de l'autonomisation des LG au travers du renforcement des capacités afin de relever les défis liés à la réalisation des SDG en matière de soins primaires.

Analysis of daily COVID-19 death bulletin data during the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thiruvananthapuram district, Kerala, India.

Context: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality trends can help discern the pattern of outbreak evolution and systemic responses. Aim: This study aimed to explore patterns of COVID-19 deaths in Thiruvananthapuram district from 31 March 2020 to 31 December 2021. Setting and Design: Secondary data analysis of COVID-19 deaths in Thiruvananthapuram district was performed. Materials and Methods: Mortality data were obtained from the district COVID-19 control room, and deaths in the first and second waves of COVID-19 were compared. Statistical Analysis: We summarised data as proportions and medians with the inter-quartile range (IQR) and performed Chi-square tests to make comparisons wherever applicable. Results: As on 31 December 2021, 4587 COVID-19 deaths were reported in Thiruvananthapuram district, with a case fatality rate of 0.91%. We observed high mortality among older persons (66.7%) and men (56.6%). The leading cause of death was bronchopneumonia (60.6%). The majority (88.5%) had co-morbidities, commonly diabetes mellitus (54.9%). The median interval from diagnosis to hospitalisation was 4 days (IQR 2-7), and that from hospitalisation to death was 2 days (IQR 0-6). The deaths reported during the second wave were four times higher than those of the first wave with a higher proportion of deaths in the absence of co-morbidities (p < 0.001). The majority of the deceased were unvaccinated. Ecological analysis with vaccine coverage data indicated 5.4 times higher mortality among unvaccinated than those who received two vaccine doses. Conclusions: The presence of co-morbidities, an unvaccinated status, and delay in hospitalisation were important reasons for COVID-19 deaths. Primary level health providers can potentially help sustaining vaccination, expeditious referral, and monitoring of COVID-19 patients.

Psychosocial Intervention Model of Kerala, India During Pandemic COVID-19: "Ottakkalla Oppamundu (You're not alone, we're with you)".

Globally, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in several psychosocial manifestations across all socioeconomic strata. This study attempted to explore the details of a psychosocial support system implemented in Kerala, India, to address psychosocial issues during this pandemic. It employed a descriptive approach using qualitative and quantitative methods. The results can be summarized into 4 overarching themes: (1) process of implementation, (2) issues addressed, (3) experiences, and (4) success stories. This intervention targeted the whole population, with a specific focus on quarantined/isolated individuals and selected vulnerable groups. COVID pandemic has sowed several negative emotions, such as anxiety; and stigma and fearful thoughts, including suicidal ideations; trepidation regarding family members; and misinfodemics in general. Social and religious corollaries of the pandemic have intensified the psychological agony. The study provides an overview of the psychosocial intervention adopted by the state during the pandemic, which has helped both the beneficiaries and the providers. It has also helped to promote positive thinking and change the attitude toward the disease among the beneficiaries. It is highly commendable that timely intervention could obviate quite a few psychiatric emergencies, including suicides and aggressive behaviors. Considering its efficiency, flexibility, and sustainability, this model can be replicated in any setting.

Functioning of Arogyakiranam programme in Kerala: A qualitative study.

CONTEXT: Arogyakiranam program, a state-run health entitlement scheme, caters to health care needs of 0 to 18-year-old children, in government hospitals of Kerala. Very few studies have been conducted in this regard. AIM: An interim analysis of the functioning of this program through stakeholder perspective facilitates understanding the mode in which the program is currently progressing, thereby paving way for bettering it further. METHODS AND MATERIAL: A qualitative study in three purposively selected districts of Kerala consisting of in-depth interviews was conducted across different levels of stakeholders including officials from different health care levels and beneficiary caretakers who bring their wards to these centers. RESULTS: The functioning of the scheme with regard to implementation, fund flow, monitoring, documenting, reporting etc., was found to be following a fine structure. The scheme provides financial risk protection to the beneficiaries' families. Perceived challenges were lesser public awareness of the scheme, the requirement of an updated guideline, funds, the need for the availability of specialists and other amenities. Complete electronic hospital proceedings, a separate account for the scheme, staff reorientation/training, more reviews, and appraisals were emphasized. The overall functioning of the scheme is found to be streamlined and highly fruitful in terms of catering to the child population in the state. CONCLUSION: Arogyakiranam program has proven to be a boon to its beneficiaries with nil out-of-pocket expenditure, providing an array of health care amenities, ensuring equity thereby relentlessly working towards universal health coverage.