A Retrospective Study to Compare the Incidence of Hyponatremia after Administration between Linezolid and Tedizolid.

Linezolid (LZD) and Tedizolid (TZD) are oxazolidinone antibiotic for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Severe hyponatremia after LZD administration have been reported. Severe hyponatremia cause seizures, unconsciousness, and even death. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the change of serum sodium level after LZD and TZD therapy. We enrolled 67 patients treated with LZD and 28 treated with TZD. We monitored the serum sodium level from the administration to 14 days after administration of oxazolidinone drug. Hyponatremia was defined a sodiuln level ≤134 mmol/L after the initiation of oxazolidinone drug. The frequency of hyponatremia in the LZD group was significantly higher than that in the TZD group (39.7% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.05). The rate of patients administered by injection was significantly higher than in the LZD group than in the TZD group (52.9% vs. 14.8%, p < 0.01). Multiple logistic regression analyses identified the albumin level before the oxazolidinone drug therapy as the independent variables associated with the development of hyponatremia. We revealed that TZD is safer than LZD in terms of hyponatremia. Therefore, cases that LZD is administered by injection should be used more carefully with hyponatremia in patients with low albumin level.

Risk factors of first recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection.

OBJECTIVES: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) often recurs. Approximately 25% of patients have recurrences after the initial treatment, and patients who have relapsed once are more likely to relapse. We aimed to identify the risk factors for initial CDI recurrence. METHODS: We performed a retrospective survey of patient backgrounds and treatment-related factors. Risk factors were analyzed using single and multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were included in the study. Prophylactic probiotic use and nasogastric tube feeding were independent risk factors for the initial recurrence of CDI. Patients using prophylactic probiotics had significantly higher recurrence rates than those not using prophylactic probiotics. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic probiotic use and nasogastric tube placement may be risk factors for the initial recurrence of CDI. It is noteworthy that CDI that occurs during the use of prophylactic probiotics may be prone to recurrence.

Empyema and bacteremia caused by Aeromonas hydrophila: Case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the advance in antibiotics and widespread chest tube drainage, acute empyema still shows a high mortality rate, accounting for 10-25%. We experienced a case of acute empyema caused by A. hydrophila, which is extremely uncommon, and reviewed all previously published articles. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year older man with a medical history of liver cirrhosis (LC) due to chronic hepatitis C and hepatic cell carcinoma was admitted to our institute. Elevated inflammatory reaction and effusions on chest CT were seen, and he was suspected of having acute empyema. Although an empiric antibiotic therapy of meropenem with chest tube drainage was performed as an initial treatment, he died within 8 hours of admission. Postmortem, both blood and left pleural fluid cultures yielded Aeromonas hydrophila. The final diagnosis was acute empyema caused by A. hydrophila. We reviewed previously reported empyema caused by Aeromonas species cases (4 A. hydrophila, and 1 A. veronii) in 4 previous reports written in English, including ours. Of 5, all were male, and the mean age was 52 years (range 27-76 years). All patients had LC due to alcohol or viral infections. As for antibiotics initially prescribed, third-generation cephalosporins were most frequently used in 3/5 (60%). Thoracentesis was performed in all patients (100%). As for prognosis, 2 (40%) survived, and 3 (60%) died. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware of the possibility of acute empyema caused by A. hydrophila among patients with chronic hepatic disease.

To what degree could clinical trials in evidence based medicine reflect reality in the treatment of candidemia?

INTRODUCTION: Evidenced based medicine (EBM) is necessary to standardize or treatment for infection since EBM is established based on the results of clinical trials. Entry criteria for clinical trials are very strict, and many patients have difficulties in being enrolled in any clinical trials regarding candidemia. It is questionable if the results of clinical trials reflect the real world of general medicine in this case. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the purpose of examining how many patients could join any randomized clinical trials for the treatment of candidemia, we reviewed all the candidemia patients in our institute during 2014-2018. The patients were divided into two groups: patients who were eligible for clinical trials (participation possible group), and those who were not (participation impossible group). Exclusion criteria for clinical trials were set based on previous clinical trials. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients was enrolled in this study. The median age was 73 years (range 36-93 years). Of these, 41 patients (59%) were male. As for site of infections, catheter related blood stream infection was most frequently seen in 37 (53%). Seventeen patients (24%) were classified as participation possible group and 53 patients (76%) were participation impossible group. Comparing the two groups, participation possible group patients have much better performance status, have less comorbidities and have longer overall survival times than participation impossible group patients. CONCLUSION: Only 24% of candidemia patients were eligible for the clinical trials. Thus, we can see that clinical trials might not correctly reflect the real world among candidemia patients.

Comparative study of SmartAmp assay and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction by saliva specimen for the diagnosing COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic of a novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been problematic worldwide. A new SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test (SmartAmp) was licensed in Japan in July 2021. This method, which enables us to diagnose COVID-19 as well as a gene mutation on the virus, is promising to reduce medical costs and staff labor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the SmartAmp assay for diagnosing COVID-19, we performed this retrospective study at our institute during April and May 2021. We compared the results of the SmartAmp assay and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) using a saliva sample from individuals suspected as having COVID-19. RESULTS: Out of 70 samples tested, the SmartAmp assay had 50 (71%) positive and 20 (29%) negative results. Using rRT-PCR as a reference, the diagnostic accuracy displayed a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 97.7%, and a negative predictive value of 70.4%. On the other hand, false-negative cases were found in 7 (10%), and there was no significant difference of Ct-value between true positive and false negative cases (Mean Ct-value 25.2 vs. 27.5 cycles, p = 0.226 by Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSION: The SmartAmp assay is a valuable method to diagnose COVID-19 rapidly. However, the negative predictive value is not high enough to diagnose the disease, so that negative results should be considered for rRT-PCR testing if patients are suspected of having COVID-19.

Efficacy and validity of guideline-concordant treatment according to the JRS guidelines for the managements of pneumonia in adults updated in 2017 for nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia. A propensity-matching score analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) commonly receive empiric antibiotic therapy according to the guideline's recommendation corresponding to the patient's deteriorated conditions. However, it is unclear whether guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) could be effective or not. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate the efficacy and validity of GCT according to the current guideline for pneumonia, we conducted this retrospective study. NHCAP patients who were admitted to our institute between 2014 and 2017 were enrolled. Based on the initial antibiotic treatment, these patients were divided into two groups, the GCT group (n = 83) and the non-GCT group (n = 146). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics and potential confounders between the two groups. After PSM, patients' characteristics, microbial profiles, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Both groups were well-balanced after PSM, and 78 patients were selected from each group. There were no differences in patients' characteristics or microbial profiles between the two groups. As for outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day, in-hospital mortality rate, duration of antibiotic treatment, or admission. The severity of pneumonia was more severe in patients with the GCT group than those with the non-GCT group. Anti-pseudomonal agents as initial treatment were more frequently seen in patients with the GCT group than those in the non-GCT group. CONCLUSION: Unlike previous studies, GCT's recommendation for management of pneumonia by the JRS in 2017 would appear to be valid and does not increase the mortality rate.

[Expectations for Pharmacists and Pharmacy Education in AST Activities].

Since 2018, high expectations have been placed on the efforts of pharmacists in infectious disease diagnostic aid via Japan's antimicrobial stewardship team (AST). We will explain this while describing the process of diagnostic aid at our institution, a university hospital, and taking into account the point of view of what is required of pharmacist by infection control doctors when performing infectious disease diagnostic aid as well. At our hospital, we implement AST rounds as infectious disease diagnostic aid for positive blood cultures, bacterial culture results, fever, long-term administration of anti-bacterial medication, example consultation cases, etc. The number of rounds has been increasing over time, totaling 5654 cases in 2018. When performing infectious disease diagnostic aid, failure to also bear in mind infection control measures can result in failed treatment and outbreaks, so AST must coordinate with infection control team (ICT). Furthermore, when engaging in infectious disease diagnostic aid, pharmacists must also participate in clinical research in order to improve the quality of treatment. Although it also depends on the facility environment they are affiliated with, it would seem to be necessary for pharmacists to verify the knowledge obtained from clinical data using a fundamental approach. Moreover, conducting education for the doctor, pharmacist, and nurse trainees who make up their fellow and future staff is another vital role of AST pharmacists.

Ceftriaxone versus tazobactam/piperacillin and carbapenems in the treatment of aspiration pneumonia: A propensity score matching analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Aspiration pneumonia (AP) accounts for 5.0-53.2% of hospitalized pneumonia and the treatment commonly used is by broad-spectrum antibiotics to cover anaerobes. Since ceftriaxone (CTRX) could generally cover oral streptococcus and anaerobes implicated in AP, it could be a useful option in the treatment of AP, instead of piperacillin-tazobactam/(PIPC/TAZ) or Carbapenems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the purpose of examining whether CTRX is as effective as broad-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of AP, this retrospective study included consecutive community-onset patients who were admitted to our institute between 2014 and 2017. These patients were divided into two groups, a CTRX group (n = 25) and a PIPC/TAZ or carbapenems group (n = 97) based on the initial antibiotic treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the potential confounders, and 23 patients were selected from each group. Patients among CTXR group received CTRX, while those among PIPC/TAZ or carbapenems group received PIPC/TAZ, or carbapenems and/or other agents. RESULTS: Both groups were well-balanced after PSM. There were no differences in 30-day mortality, duration of hospital stay or antibiotic treatments in the between them. The medical costs were much more expensive in the PIPC/TAZ or carbapenems group than in the CTR group (35,582 v. s. 8678 Japanese yen, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CTRX is one of the most useful antibiotic treatment for AP, which is not inferior to broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment. In addition, usage of CTRX in the treatment of AP is more economical than broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, and could contribute to reduction of medical costs.

Efficacy and validity of automated quantitative chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen test from saliva specimen in the diagnosis of COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic of a novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been problematic worldwide. A new SARS-CoV-2 antigen test (LUMIPULSEⓇ) was licensed and widely used in Japan since May 2020. We conducted this study intending to whether the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test using a saliva sample is effective and valid for the diagnosis of COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed and compared the diagnostic accuracy of both the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test and real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) using a saliva sample from individuals suspected as having COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 305 samples were collected and tested in Aichi Medical University Hospital and affiliated facilities from December 2020 until January 2021 at our institute. Using reverse-transcription PCR as a reference, the AUROC of the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test was 0.903 (95% confidential interval 0.845-0.962, p < 0.001). The appropriate cut-off antigen level was 4.0 pg/mL and had a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 99.6%, a positive predictive value of 98%, and a negative predictive value of 94.5%. On the other hand, the diagnostic accuracy of the antigen test decreased among patients among patients with COVID-19 with threshold cycle (Ct-value)≥27, which shows the AUROC was 0.795 (95%CI 0.687-0.907, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test from saliva specimen could be one of the most useful diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in general practice, clinicians should know the limitations of the antigen test.

The combined score of quick SOFA and the charlson comorbidity index could be a poor prognostic indicator for in-hospital mortality among patients with necrotizing fasciitis.

INTRODUCTION: While necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but rapidly progressive devastating soft tissue infectious disease showing a high in-hospital mortality rate of 20-30%, there are no evidence-based predictive tools. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the purpose of examining which predictive tools could correctly reflect the severity and prognosis of NF, we retrospectively reviewed all patients who were diagnosed with NF at our institute. The disease severity was evaluated by quick SOFA (qSOFA), SOFA score, SIRS score, APACHE II score, LRINEC score and the combined score of qSOFA and CCI. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 68 years (range 39-96 years). With respect to the predictive values for in-hospital mortality among NF patients, the area under the ROC curve for qSOFA, SOFA score, APACHE II score, the combined score of qSOFA and CCI were 0.653 (p = 0.192), 0.588 (p = 0.12), 0.709 (p = 0.075) and 0.782 (p = 0.016) respectively. A univariate analysis showed that the combined score of qSOFA and CCI≥5 and the initial treatment failure were poor prognostic indicators for the in-hospital death among NF patients. The appropriate cut-offs of qSOFA and CCI were based on the Youden Index. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the combined score of qSOFA and CCI could reflect the severity and prognosis of NF for in-hospital death.

Combination of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) could predict the severity and prognosis of candidemia more accurately than the Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score.

BACKGROUND: Candidemia has emerged as an important nosocomial infection, with a mortality rate of 30-50%. It is the fourth most common nosocomial bloodstream infection (BSI) in the United States and the seventh most common nosocomial BSI in Europe and Japan. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for determining the severity and prognosis of candidemia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted to hospital with candidemia between September 2014 and May 2018. The severity of candidemia was evaluated using the SOFA score and the Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score. Patients' underlying diseases were assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS: Of 70 patients enrolled, 41 (59%) were males, and 29 (41%) were females. Their median age was 73 years (range: 36-93 years). The most common infection site was catheter-related bloodstream infection (n=36, 51%).The 30-day, and in-hospital mortality rates were 36 and 43%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that SOFA score ≥5, APACHE II score ≥13, initial antifungal treatment with echinocandin, albumin < 2.3, C-reactive protein > 6, disturbance of consciousness, and CCI ≥3 were related with 30-day mortality. Of these 7, multivariate analysis showed that the combination of SOFA score ≥5 and CCI ≥3 was the best independent prognostic indicator for 30-day and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The combined SOFA score and CCI was a better predictor of the 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality than the APACHE II score alone.

An unexpected case of Cardiobacterium valvarum prosthetic arthritis without cardiac lesions: Case report and literature review.

We report a case of prosthetic arthritis caused by Cardiobacterium valvarum, which has been exclusively reported to cause intravascular infections. A 81-year-old Japanese female complained prosthetic knee joint pain. Arthrocentesis cultured no pathogen, and surgical replacement of the implant surface was performed. Modified Levinthal medium culture and 16S rRNA sequencing has finally led to diagnosis of C. valvarum prosthetic knee arthritis without cardiac lesions. Fastidious bacteria such as C. valvarum can be candidate pathogens of orthopedic infections whose causative agents are sometimes unidentified. Further development of molecular diagnostics is expected, but also the importance of conventional methods should be noted.

Usefulness of serum procalcitonin for necrotizing fasciitis as an early diagnostic tool.

INTRODUCTION: While the early diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is crucial and could lead to a favorable outcome, it is difficult to differentiate NF from cellulitis, resulting in delay for the appropriate treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the purpose of examining which diagnostic tools could correctly differentiate NF from cellulitis, we conducted this case-control study. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who were diagnosed with NF at our institute during 2014-2019. The patients who were diagnosed with cellulitis were randomly selected during the study period as the control group. The severity of NF is evaluated by serum-procalcitonin (PCT), LRINEC score, NTSI assessment and SIARI score. RESULTS: A total of 25 NF patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 68 years (range 39-79) and 18 (72%) were male. Comparing NF and cellulitis groups, NF group showed a higher LRINEC score and serum PCT than cellulitis group did, even though there was no statistical significance in serum PCT. With respect to the diagnostic value for differentiating NF from cellulitis, the area under the ROC curve for of serum PCT and LRINEC scores were 0.928 [95% confidential interval (CI) 0.864-0.992, p < 0.001] and 0.846 (95% CI 0.757-0.936, p < 0.001). The appropriate serum-PCT cutoff value was 1.0 and had a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value of 81%, and a negative predictive value of 93%. CONCLUSION: Serum-PCT could be a useful diagnostic marker for differentiating diagnosis of NF from cellulitis.

Clinical characteristics and relevance of coagulase-negative Staphylococci other than S. epidermidis by positive blood culture.

INTRODUCTION: Staphylococci is the most commonly isolated bacteria in blood cultures (BC), and is mostly regarded as contamination. However, the clinical relevance and characteristics of CNS other than Staphylococcus epidermidis (Non-SE-CNS) is still unknown. METHODS: For the purpose of clarifying the epidemiology and clinical significance of Non-Se-CNS infections, we retrospectively evaluated BC isolates of Non-Se-CNS at our institute from May 2013 to March 2017. Infections were defined as true bacteremia if (1) two or more positive BCs of the same species were present (or detection of the same species in another clinically relevant sample), (2) the patient had clinical symptoms as outlined in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's definition of primary blood stream infection8 and the symptoms or markers of inflammation (e.g., fever, symptoms, white cell counts, C-reactive protein, or procalcitonin) were improved after pathogen-directed therapy (e.g. either antibiotic therapy and/or removal of the foreign body in the case of catheter-related blood stream infections suspected) and (3) without any other infection. RESULTS: During the period, 279 patients with BC positive for Non Se-CNS were identified. 44 patients were excluded, either due to missing data or multiple pathogens in the same BC. Among the remaining 235 patients, 67 (29%) were categorized as true bacteremia (n = 43) or possible infections (n = 24). Resistance rate to methicillin among Non-SE-CNS is about 60%, which is lower than those among S. epidermidis of 78%. CONCLUSION: About 30% of Non-Se-CNS isolates were clinically relevant in our study. Antibiotic susceptibility of Non-SE-CNS is quite different than those of S. epidermidis.

Plasma procalcitonin levels remain low at the onset of gram-positive bacteremia regardless of severity or the presence of shock: A retrospective analysis of patients with detailed clinical characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: Procalcitonin (PCT) is an early diagnosis marker of sepsis/bacteremia. However, some reports refer to its lower responsiveness to gram-positive bacteremia. We retrospectively evaluated the PCT values at the onset of bacteremia in relation to severity index. METHODS: Patients with bacteremia caused by two gram-negative bacteria (46 E. coli and 50 Klebsiella pneumoniae) and three gram-positive bacteria (45 S. aureus, 56 S. epidermidis, and 10 S. mitis) were studied. The plasma PCT and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were compared between species and different Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score groups. RESULTS: The median PCT level was higher in gram-negative than in gram-positive bacteremia in overall (13.09 vs. 0.50 ng/mL, p < 0.0001), in SOFA score≥4 group (28.85 vs.1.72 ng/mL, p < 0.0001) and in SOFA<4 group (2.64 vs. 0.42 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). Only 46%, and 11% of patients showed PCT ≥0.5 ng/mL in S. epidermidis, and S. mitis bacteremia, respectively. PCT was significantly better than CRP in discriminating gram-negative from gram-positive bacteremia (AUCROC; 0.828 and 0.634, p < 0.001), but it was low in Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia regardless of SOFA scores. CONCLUSIONS: PCT levels are lower in gram-positive bacteremia regardless of SOFA scores or the presence of shock. The conventional sepsis cutoff of 0.5 ng/mL may overlook certain proportions of gram-positive bacteremia.

Clinical manifestations and radiological features by chest computed tomographic findings of a novel coronavirus disease-19 pneumonia among 92 patients in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) could cause a severe acute respiratory infectious disease, showing a high mortality rate of 12-45% among cases who required intensive care unit admission. COVID-19 pneumonia PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the purpose of identifying clinical manifestations and radiological findings of COVID-19 pneumonia, we reviewed all cases of COVID-19 pneumonia which were published by the homepage of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases from Feb 5 2020 until April 30 2020, including our cases. All patients were diagnosed based on positive results of the novel coronavirus-real-time RT-PCR with chest computed tomography (CT) findings. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 66 years (range 16-92 years). For all, 50 (54%) were males. The most common underlying disease was hypertension in 32 (36%). Any comorbidity was seen in 60 (67%). The mortality rate was 4 (6%). In terms of clinical symptoms on an initial visit, fever and cough were confirmed in 66 (72%) and 37 (40%). Forty-three (47%) had no respiratory symptoms. As for radiological findings by chest CT scan, ground-glass opacities (GGO)s, peripheral distribution, bilateral lung involvements were seen in 88 (96%), 76 (83%) and 78 (85%), respectively. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to diagnose as COVID-19 pneumonia due to poor respiratory symptoms. Chest CT findings typically show GGO, peripheral and bilateral shadows. Patients should have chest CT performed if suspected for early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention, resulting in a favorable outcome and prevention of secondary nosocomial transmitted infection.

Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.

Considering the issues of shortage of medical resources and the invasiveness and infection risk involved in the collection of nasopharyngeal swab specimens, there is a need for an effective alternative test specimen for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. Here, we investigated suitability of saliva as a non-invasively obtained specimen for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19. In total, 28 paired clinical specimens of saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 12 patients at various time points after symptom onset. Each specimen was assayed using reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) on the BD MAX open system using primers and probes targeting the N-gene. The saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens showed 19 and 15 positive results, respectively. No invalid (PCR inhibition) result was observed for any specimen. The qualitative results of each specimen obtained in the period immediately after symptom onset were similar. Three convalescent patients presented saliva-positive results, whereas their nasopharyngeal swabs were negative at four different time points, suggesting that saliva may be superior to nasopharyngeal swabs in terms of obtaining stable assay result of SARS-CoV-2. In conclusion, our results suggest that saliva can potentially serve as an alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs as a specimen for SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR. As saliva can be collected by patients themselves, it may be an effective way to overcome the shortage of personal protective equipment and specimen sampling tools.

Could threshold cycle value correctly reflect the severity of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is diagnosed by positive result of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the novel coronavirus. We concluded that cycle threshold value (Ct-value) of real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assay could decrease as patients recover. Results of rRT-PCR assay could remain positive among asymptomatic patients for longer than 2 weeks. The discharge criteria of COVID-19 patients using a negative result of rRT-PCR should be reconsidered.

Observational study in a single institute in Japan: How many community-onset pneumonia patients would have Clostridioides difficile infections after treatment?

While community-onset pneumonia patients such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) have several risk factors of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), prognostic guidelines for pneumonia never mention the occurrence of CDI following treatment for pneumonia. For the purpose of examining the occurrence and prevalence of CDI, we reviewed all community-onset pneumonia patients who were admitted to our institute during the study period. A total of 406 patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 257 patients (63%) were male, and the median age was 79 years (range 19-103 years). Surprisingly, 155 CAP (88%) and all HCAP (100%) patients had one or more risk factors for CDI. Furthermore, 70 CAP (40%) and 157 HCAP (69%) patients had more than 3 risk factors for CDI. Despite these facts, probiotic medication for prevention of CDI were prescribed for 12 (7%) CAP and 15 (7%) HCAP patients as the initial treatment. Finally, 3% and 9% of CAP and HCAP patients had CDI after completing the treatment for pneumonia. Regarding the duration of antibiotic therapy, 146 CAP (82%) and 176 HCAP (77%) patients received it for longer than 8 days, even though bacteremia was not confirmed in those patients. In addition, 27 CAP (15%) and 26 HCAP (11%) patients received a combination antibiotic therapy as an initial treatment. They seemed to be unnecessary. Physicians should acknowledge community-onset pneumonia has several risk factors for CDI, and should avoid a longer than necessary antibiotic therapy and unnecessary combination antibiotic therapy for pneumonia patients with risk factors for CDI.