Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 11(1): 25-9, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17169872

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the treatment of foreign body airway obstruction in adults has been well studied, few data exist on the characterization of prehospital experiences. OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency, etiologies, and treatments of foreign body airway obstruction in adults in the prehospital setting and to discuss the relative efficacies of treatments and presenting factors that predict overall patient outcome. METHODS: A San Diego County prehospital database was retrospectively reviewed for all adult patients over a 17-month period with data extracted on demographic characteristics, incident outcome, patient disposition, item involved in obstruction, location of episode, initial vital signs, initial level of consciousness, pertinent medical history, treatments initiated by bystanders and paramedics, and response to those treatments. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 513 cases of foreign body airway obstruction in adults. Of these, 17 (3.3%) died. The mean age was 65.0 years, with increasing age correlating with worse outcome. The item causing obstruction varied widely, with medications and meat being the most common items. The Heimlich maneuver was the most commonly used intervention, with an 86.5% rate of patient improvement. Magill forceps proved useful for three cases refractory to the Heimlich maneuver. Presenting vital sign aberrations, particularly with respiratory rate, correlated with poorer patient outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Foreign body airway obstruction represents a true emergency in adults, with a 3.3% mortality rate in the current study. The Heimlich maneuver was used frequently and with good success.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/therapy , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Airway Obstruction/epidemiology , Airway Obstruction/etiology , California/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
2.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 11(1): 80-4, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17169883

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Continuing quality improvement (CQI) reviews reflect that medication administration errors occur in the prehospital setting. These include errors involving dose, medication, route, concentration, and treatment. METHODS: A survey was given to paramedics in San Diego County. The survey tool was established on the basis of previous literature reviews and questions developed with previous CQI data. RESULTS: A total of 352 surveys were returned, with the paramedics reporting a mean of 8.5 years of field experience. They work an average of 11.0 shifts/month with an average of 25.4 hours and 6.7 calls/shift. Thirty-two (9.1%) responding paramedics reported committing a medication error in the last 12 months. Types of errors included dose-related errors (63%), protocol errors (33%), wrong route errors (21%), and wrong medication errors (4%). Issues identified in contributing to the errors include failure to triple check, infrequent use of the medication, dosage calculation error, and incorrect dosage given. Fatigue, training, and equipment setup of the drug box were not listed as any of the contributing factors. The majority of these errors were self-reported to their CQI representative (79.1%), with 8.3% being reported by the base hospital radio nurse, 8.3% found upon chart review, and 4.2% noted by paramedic during call but never reported. CONCLUSIONS: Nine percent of paramedics responding to an anonymous survey report medication errors in the last 12 months, with 4% of these errors never having been reported in the CQI process. Additional safeguards must continue to be implemented to decrease the incidence of medication errors.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Technicians , Medication Errors , Truth Disclosure , California , Humans
3.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 10(4): 457-62, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16997774

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Continuing quality improvement (CQI) reviews reflect that medication administration errors occur in the prehospital setting. These include errors involving dose, medication, route, concentration, and treatment. METHODS: A survey was given to paramedics in San Diego County. The survey tool was established based on previous literature reviews and questions developed based on previous CQI data. RESULTS: A total of 352 surveys were returned, with the paramedics reporting a mean of 8.5 years of field experience. They work an average of 11.0 shifts/month with an average shift length of 25.4 hours and 6.7 calls/shift. Thirty-two responding paramedics (9.1%) reported committing a medication error in the past 12 months. Types of errors included dose-related errors (63%), protocol errors (33%), wrong route errors (21%), and wrong medication errors (4%). Issues identified in contributing to the errors include failure to triple check, infrequent use of the medication, dosage calculation error, and incorrect dosage given. Fatigue, training, and equipment setup of the drug box were not listed as any of the contributing factors. The majority of these errors were self-reported to their CQI representative (79.1%), with 8.3% reported by the base hospital radio nurse, 8.3% found on chart review, and 4.2% noted by the paramedic during the call but never reported. CONCLUSIONS: Nine percent of paramedics responding to an anonymous survey reported medication errors in the past 12 months, with 4% of these errors never having been reported in the CQI process. Additional safeguards must continue to be implemented to decrease the incidence of medication errors.


Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Adult , California , Child , Humans , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...