Variability of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation practice in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from the emergency department to intensive care unit in Japan.

AIM: A lack of known guidelines for the provision of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) to patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has led to variability in practice between hospitals even in the same country. Because variability in ECPR practice has not been completely examined, we aimed to describe the variability in ECPR practice in patients with OHCA from the emergency department (ED) to the intensive care units (ICU). METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire to examine variability in ECPR practice was completed in January 2020 by 36 medical institutions who participated in the SAVE-J II study. Institutional demographics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, initial resuscitation management, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) initiation, initial ECMO management, intra-aortic balloon pumping/endotracheal intubation/management during coronary angiography, and computed tomography criteria were recorded. RESULTS: We received responses from all 36 institutions. Four institutions (11.1%) had a hybrid emergency room. Cardiovascular surgery was always involved throughout the entire ECMO process in only 14.7% of institutions; 60% of institutions had formal inclusion criteria and 50% had formal exclusion criteria. In two-thirds of institutions, emergency physicians carried out cannulation. Catheterization room was the leading location of cannulation (48.6%) followed by ED (31.4%). The presence of formal exclusion criteria significantly increased with increasing ECPR volume (P for trend <0.001). Intra-aortic balloon pumping was routinely initiated in only 25% of institutions. Computed tomography was routinely carried out before coronary angiography in 25% of institutions. CONCLUSIONS: We described the variability in ECPR practice in patients with OHCA from the ED to the ICU.

Feasibility and Safety of Intravascular Temperature Management for Severe Heat Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: Heat stroke is a life-threatening condition with high mortality and morbidity. Although several cooling methods have been reported, the feasibility and safety of treating heat stroke using intravascular temperature management are unclear. This study evaluated the efficacies of conventional treatment with or without intravascular temperature management for severe heat stroke. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. SETTING: Critical care and emergency medical centers at 10 tertiary hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients with severe heat stroke hospitalized during two summers. INTERVENTIONS: Conventional cooling with or without intravascular temperature management. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cooling efficacy, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, occurrence rate of serious adverse events, and prognosis based on the modified Rankin Scale and Cerebral Performance Category. Patient outcomes were compared between five centers that were prospectively assigned to perform conventional cooling (control group: eight patients) and five centers that were assigned to perform conventional cooling plus intravascular temperature management (intravascular temperature management group: 13 patients), based on equipment availability. Despite their higher initial temperatures, all patients in the intravascular temperature management group reached the target temperature of 37°C within 24 hours, although only 50% of the patients in the control group reached 37°C (p < 0.01). The intravascular temperature management group also had a significant decrease in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score during the first 24 hours after admission (4.0 vs 1.5; p = 0.04). Furthermore, the intravascular temperature management group experienced fewer serious adverse events during their hospitalization, compared with the control group. The percentages of favorable outcomes at discharge and 30 days after admission were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of intravascular temperature management and conventional cooling was safe and feasible for treating severe heat stroke. The results indicate that better temperature management may help prevent organ failure. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to validate our findings.