Estimating numbers of blind children for planning services: findings in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.

AIM: Childhood blindness is included in the VISION 2020 initiative. However, childhood blindness is rare, so there is limited population-based evidence to assist with the planning of services. We carried out a survey of childhood blindness in Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania, to generate information needed for planning eye care services. METHODS: The study was carried out in parallel with a Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) survey. Villages within Kilimanjaro Region were selected on a probability-proportional-to-size basis. Key informants in each village were trained to identify children with any vision problems; a visiting team assessed the children to determine visual status and arranged for further assessment as needed at hospital. The files of children at schools for the blind in the Region were reviewed to identify children in schools from the selected study villages. RESULTS: Among the 95 040 children in the 72 villages sampled, 13 children were identified as blind; an additional three children were found in the schools for the blind. The prevalence of blindness was 0.17 per 1000 children; the causes of blindness varied but there was no vitamin A- or measles-related corneal blindness and only one case of unoperated cataract. DISCUSSION: The low prevalence of blindness in children suggests that efforts at reducing childhood blindness in Kilimanjaro Region have been effective. Planners there should focus on community-based approaches to ensure that blind children have appropriate rehabilitation services and educational placements. While it remains impractical to carry out large childhood blindness surveys, this approach attached to a RAAB survey may be useful for generating information for planning services.

Measuring cataract surgical services in children: an example from Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Childhood cataract is becoming increasingly recognised as a priority for reducing childhood blindness in developing countries. However, there have been no standard methods to monitor progress in providing this service, besides sporadic reports of surgeries performed. METHODS: Information on all children receiving surgery for congenital/developmental cataract in the two Child Eye Health Tertiary Facilities (CEHTF) in Tanzania was collected for 2004-6. An annual childhood cataract surgical rate (CCSR) was calculated per region. Male-to-female ratios were also generated by region of residence. RESULTS: Overall, the CCSR (2006) in Tanzania was 9.9 per million population, ranging from 32.3 for regions where CEHTF are located to 5.4 for regions not adjacent to CEHTF regions. There were, on average, 148 boys for every 100 girls receiving surgery. CONCLUSION: Practical application of a measure of service delivery for childhood cataract has been useful in identifying gaps in utilisation of existing services by region as well as by gender. Testing in other settings would be helpful. An apparent inequity in use of services by girls requires attention.