Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hand Ther ; 33(1): 13-24, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30905495

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial with parallel groups. INTRODUCTION: Early active mobilization programs are used after zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs; two programs used are relative motion extension (RME) orthosis and controlled active motion (CAM). Although no comparative studies exist, use of the RME orthosis has been reported to support earlier hand function. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This randomized clinical trial investigated whether patients managed with an RME program would recover hand function earlier postoperatively than those managed with a CAM program. METHODS: Forty-two participants with zones V-VI extensor tendon repairs were randomized into either a CAM or RME program. The Sollerman Hand Function Test (SHFT) was the primary outcome measure of hand function. Days to return to work, QuickDASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire, total active motion (TAM), grip strength, and patient satisfaction were the secondary measures of outcome. RESULTS: The RME group demonstrated better results at four weeks for the SHFT score (P = .0073; 95% CI: -10.9, -1.8), QuickDASH score (P = .05; 95% CI: -0.05, 19.5), and TAM (P = .008; 95% CI: -65.4, -10.6). Days to return to work were similar between groups (P = .77; 95% CI: -28.1, 36.1). RME participants were more satisfied with the orthosis (P < .0001; 95% CI: 3.5, 8.4). No tendon ruptures occurred. DISCUSSION: Participants managed using an RME program, and RME finger orthosis demonstrated significantly better early hand function, TAM, and orthosis satisfaction than those managed by the CAM program using a static wrist-hand-finger orthosis. This is likely due to the less restrictive design of the RME orthosis. CONCLUSIONS: The RME program supports safe earlier recovery of hand function and motion when compared to a CAM program following repair of zones V and VI extensor tendons.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Hand Injuries/rehabilitation , Orthotic Devices , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Tendon Injuries/rehabilitation , Adult , Female , Hand Injuries/physiopathology , Hand Injuries/surgery , Hand Strength , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Recovery of Function , Tendon Injuries/physiopathology , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
HPB Surg ; 2013: 861681, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24062601

ABSTRACT

Introduction. In the UK, patients where liver resection is contemplated are discussed at hepatobiliary multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings. The aim was to assess MDT performance by identification of patients where radiological and pathological diagnoses differed. Materials and Methods. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all cases undergoing liver resection from March 2006 to January 2012 was performed. The presumed diagnosis as a result of radiological investigation and MDT discussion is recorded at the time of surgery. Imaging was reviewed by specialist gastrointestinal radiologists, and resultswereagreedonby consensus. Results. Four hundred and thirty-eight patients were studied. There was a significant increase in the use of preoperative imaging modalities (P ≤ 0.01) but no change in the rate of discrepant diagnosis over time. Forty-two individuals were identified whose final histological diagnosis was different to that following MDT discussion (9.6%). These included 30% of patients diagnosed preoperatively with hepatocellular carcinoma and 25% with cholangiocarcinoma of a major duct. Discussion. MDT assessment of patients preoperatively is accurate in terms of diagnosis. The highest rate of discrepancies occurred in patients with focal lesions without chronic liver disease or primary cancer, where hepatocellular carcinoma was overdiagnosed and peripheral cholangiocarcinoma underdiagnosed, where particular care should be taken. Additional care should be taken in these groups and preoperative multimodality imaging considered.

3.
Clin Radiol ; 66(11): 1086-93, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21840516

ABSTRACT

Ductal plate malformations, also known as fibrocystic liver diseases, are a group of congenital disorders resulting from abnormal embryogenesis of the biliary ductal system. The abnormalities include choledochal cyst, Caroli's disease and Caroli's syndrome, adult autosomal dominant polycystic liver disease, and biliary hamartoma. The hepatic lesions can be associated with renal anomalies such as autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD), medullary sponge kidney, and nephronophthisis. A clear knowledge of the embryology and pathogenesis of the ductal plate is central to the understanding of the characteristic imaging appearances of these complex disorders. Accurate diagnosis of ductal plate malformations is important to direct appropriate clinical management and prevent misdiagnosis.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Diseases/diagnosis , Bile Duct Neoplasms/diagnosis , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/abnormalities , Hamartoma/diagnosis , Adult , Bile Duct Diseases/congenital , Bile Duct Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Bile Duct Diseases/pathology , Bile Duct Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/diagnostic imaging , Caroli Disease/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Hamartoma/diagnostic imaging , Hamartoma/pathology , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/congenital , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Recessive/diagnosis , Radiography , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...