Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33985694

ABSTRACT

Exposure to ionizing radiation is unavoidable to our modern developing society as its applications are widespread and increasing with societal development. The exposures may be planned as in medical applications or may be unplanned as in occupational work and radiological emergencies. Dose quantification of planned and unplanned exposures is essential to make crucial decisions for management of such exposures. This study aims to establish ex-vivo dose-response curve for 60Co-gamma-ray induced gamma-H2AX-foci by immunofluorescence using microscopy and flowcytometry with human lymphocytes. This technique has the potential to serve as a rapid tool for dose estimation and triage application during small to large scale radiological emergencies and clinical exposures. Response curves were generated for the dose range 0-4 Gy (at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of incubation after irradiation) with microscopy and 0-8 Gy (at 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h of incubation after irradiation) with flow cytometry. These curves can be applied for dose reconstruction when post exposure sampling is delayed up to 96 h. In order to evaluate Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) of the assay, variation of background frequency of gamma-H2AX-foci was measured in 12 volunteers. To understand the application window of the assay, gamma-H2AX foci decay kinetics has been studied up to 96 h with microscopy and response curves were generated from 1 to 96 hours post exposure. Gamma-H2AX fluorescence intensity decay kinetics was also studied up to 96 h with flow cytometry and response curves were generated from 2 to 24 hours post irradiation. Established curves were validated with dose blinded samples and also compared with standard cytogenetic assays. An inter-comparison of dose estimates was made among gamma-H2AX assay, dicentric aberrations and reciprocal translocations for application window in various dose ranges and time of blood collection after exposures.


Subject(s)
Cobalt Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Cobalt Radioisotopes/toxicity , Gamma Rays/adverse effects , Calibration , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Cytogenetics/methods , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Emergencies , Histones/metabolism , Humans , Lymphocytes/metabolism , Lymphocytes/radiation effects , Radiation, Ionizing , Triage/methods
2.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 56(3): 227-239, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28612110

ABSTRACT

To explore possible applications of iodoacetate (IA), a glycolytic inhibitor, in cancer treatment, we screened its cytotoxicity and radioprotective/sensitizing efficacy in three different mammalian cell lines; A549 (human lung carcinoma), MCF7 (human mammary cancer), a non-cancerous CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells and human lymphocytes. Experiments were carried out using IA concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 2.5 µg/ml, with or without 60Coγ-radiation. In the outcomes, IA was found to exhibit higher toxicity in the cancer cells, whereas it was non-toxic/marginally toxic to the non-cancerous cells. Considerably higher glucose uptake in both cancer cells lines was observed indicating higher rates of glycolysis. IA significantly inhibited glycolysis as reflected by GAPDH activity inhibition. Radiomodifying effects of IA were found to be concentration dependent in both cancerous and non-cancerous cells. The response in non-cancerous was found to be biphasic: at lower concentrations, it offered significant radioprotection; however, the protection decreased with increasing concentration. Moreover, at the highest tested concentration, marginal radiosensitization was also observed (as indicated by clonogenic assay). In both cancer cells, IA offered significant amount of radiosensitization which was considerably high at higher concentrations. Further experiments were carried out to estimate the Dose Modification Factor (DMF) to quantify and compare relative radiosensitization by IA in cancer and normal cell lines. The DMF was calculated for three different concentrations of IA, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 µg/ml, and corresponding values were found to be 1.26, 1.43, and 1.89 for A549 cancer cells, whereas for normal CHO cells, it was 1.13, 1.13, and 1.24. In conclusion, differential killing and radiosensitizing effects of IA suggest that it may have potential use as a anticancer agent and radiosensitizer in cancer therapy.


Subject(s)
Iodoacetates/pharmacology , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Animals , Biological Transport/drug effects , Biological Transport/radiation effects , CHO Cells , Cell Death/drug effects , Cell Death/radiation effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Glucose/metabolism , Humans , Lymphocytes/drug effects , Lymphocytes/metabolism , Lymphocytes/radiation effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...