ABSTRACT
Background: Musical perception requires a host of skills. Instrumental musicians place greater emphasis on motor coordination, whereas vocal musicians rehearse vocal sounds. The study explored the differential advantages of musical background on binaural integration and interaction in musicians (instrumentalists, vocalists) and compared them with age-matched non-musicians. Methods: Eight six participants aged 20-40 y with normal hearing sensitivity were subjected to binaural tests using a standard group comparison research design. The participants were segregated into three groups - Group 1 included instrumentalists (n = 26, mean age: 17.73 ± 2.83 y), while Group 2 and Group 3 consisted of vocalists (n = 30, mean age: 19.30 ± 2.47 y) and non-musicians (n = 30, mean age: 18.20 ± 3.02 y) respectively. The binaural processes namely integration (Dichotic syllable test, DST; and virtual acoustic space identification - VASI) and interaction (Interaural difference thresholds for time and level: ITD & ILD), were administered on all the participants. Results: Statistical analyses showed the main effect of musicianship. Bonferroni pair-wise test revealed that the musicians (instrumentalists and vocalists) outperformed (p < 0.05) non-musicians in all the tests. The differential advantage of the musical background was seen on the binaural integration test with instrumentalists performing better in the VASI test compared to vocalists, and vice-versa for DST. No difference was observed in interaction tasks (ITD & ILD) between vocalists and instrumentalists (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Musical background-induced differential advantages can be reasonably noted in the binaural skills of instrumentalists and vocalists (compared to non-musicians).
ABSTRACT
The aim of the article was to compare the auditory working memory capacities during adolescence period. A total of 45 participants between the age of 10 and 22 years were included in the study. The participants were grouped in 3 based on their age range from 10 to 14 (group 1), 14-18 (group 2), and 18-22 years (group 3) for the study. Participants with normal hearing thresholds and no history of middle ear pathology were enrolled for the study. Auditory working memory tests were carried out in these individuals which included midpoint and maximum scores of ascending span, descending span, digit forward span, and digit backward span. Statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS version 25.0, descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out. Data was normally distributed on the Shapiro-Wilk's test of normality due to which a one-way ANOVA was done to establish the nature of significance across the groups and Tukey's post hoc test was done for establishing the presence of significance between the groups (group 1-group 2, group 2-groups 3, and group 1-group 3). To identify the relationship between the age of individuals and working memory scores, a Pearson correlation was done. Results reveal the presence of significant difference across the groups and between the groups too (p < 0.05) with noticeable significant effect seen in group 3 (18-22 years) than in group 2 (14-18 years) and group 1 (10-14 years) respectively. There is a positive effect of age and changes in working memory abilities. This implies the presence of maturation during adolescence period at the level of prefrontal cortex and other cortical areas. Supporting literatures state there is presence of reduced activation on functional imaging studies during early adulthood period which could attribute to the significantly high scores in age range 18-22 years.
