Knowledge, Judgment, and Skills in Reproductive Health Care and Abortion Are Essential to the Practice of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

A social contract exists between medicine and society. In fulfilling the social contract to our patients and society, physicians have an obligation to provide the evidence-based care that patients want and need. What do the data regarding knowledge, judgment, and skills required to practice obstetrics and gynecology show? Obstetrics and gynecology job task analyses assess the importance of knowledge, judgment, and skills through surveys asking practicing physicians about the criticality and frequency of a variety of task statements to create an importance score. Excerpts from a 2018 practice analysis survey clearly indicate that reproductive health care and abortion are important components of the knowledge, judgment, and skills to practice obstetrics and gynecology in the United States. These standards help to assure the knowledge, judgment, and skills of current and future generations of ob-gyns, so their patients and the public can be provided the comprehensive reproductive health care they want and need. It is sometimes important to restate principles and standards that have become ingrained in thoughts and practices that guide physicians and serve to protect our patients. This concept is important now, as our country, health care professionals, and patients examine the future of reproductive health care, including abortion.

The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology's remote certifying examination: successes and challenges.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology canceled the 2020 in-person subspecialty certifying examinations and developed remote administration of 4 subspecialty certifying examinations in 2021 for both examiners and candidates. Because of the continued risks of the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2021 specialty certifying examinations and the 2022 subspecialty certifying examinations were also administered remotely for candidates. For these examinations, examiners participated remotely in 2021 and were at the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology testing center in 2022. Overall, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology remote certifying examinations have been well-received by candidates and examiners according to posttest survey data. Candidate performance has been comparable to that observed in the previous in-person examinations. In this review, we describe our implementation, process modifications, successes, and challenges with remote testing. During this process, the American Board of Medical Specialties approval was required, and the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing served as our testing-industry guideline to ensure valid interpretation of scores and fairness to candidates.

Correlations between Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestones and American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores: an initial validity study.

BACKGROUND: Since the launch of the Outcome Project in 2001, the graduate medical education community has been working to implement the 6 general competencies. In 2014, all Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs implemented specialty-specific milestones to advance competency-based assessment. Each clinical competency committee of the Obstetrics and Gynecology program assesses all residents twice a year on the milestones. These data are reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education as part of a continuous quality improvement effort in graduate medical education. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestones and residency program graduates' performance on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying (written) examination. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a validity study of all graduating (postgraduate year 4) Obstetrics and Gynecology residents in 2017 within Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited United States training programs (1260 residents from 242 programs). This cohort of residents began receiving milestone assessments during their postgraduate year 2 in 2014; the first-year milestones were implemented for all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited Obstetrics and Gynecology programs. This cohort completed their sixth and final milestone assessment at graduation in June 2017 for a total of 6 periods of milestone assessments. Data regarding each resident's milestone ratings in each of the 28 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education subcompetencies for Obstetrics and Gynecology were assessed for their association with candidates' American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores using a generalized estimating equation regression model. RESULTS: Data were available and analyzed from 1184 residents from 240 programs, representing 94% of the total academic year 2017 graduates of Obstetrics and Gynecology residency training programs. There was a substantial association between most milestone ratings at the 6 assessment points and candidates' performance on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination. The strongest associations with the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology were within all 7 of the subcompetencies of Medical Knowledge (range of slope correlation coefficients at final milestone ratings 3.84-5.17; slope coefficients can be interpreted as the gain in qualifying examination points per unit increase in milestone level). At the final milestone assessment, but more modest associations with the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores were also seen with 9 of the 11 Patient Care and Procedural Skills subcompetencies, the 2 of 2 Practice-Based Learning and Improvement subcompetencies, the 2 of 2 Systems-Based Practice subcompetencies, and 2 of the 3 Professionalism subcompetencies. Only 1 of the 3 Interpersonal and Communication Skills subcompetencies was associated with American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores. CONCLUSION: The pattern of associations between the qualifying examination scores and milestone ratings for the 2017 graduating cohort of Obstetrics and Gynecology residents followed a logical pattern, with the strongest associations seen in Medical Knowledge, and lower to no associations in subcompetencies not as effectively assessed on multiple-choice examinations. Although some positive associations were noted for non-Medical Knowledge milestones, these associations could be caused by correlational rating errors with further study needed to better understand these patterns.

The Certification Process Driving Patient Safety.

In 2016, the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) and the National Patient Safety Foundation issued a joint call encouraging each ABMS member board to integrate patient safety principles and activities into their initial and continuous certification processes. This article describes how the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology integrates various aspects of patient safety principles into its initial and continuous certification processes. The authors first describe how they assess patient safety within their initial certification processes. They then describe each component of their maintenance of certification program, and how they intentionally embed patient safety principles within each component.