Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Interv Cardiol ; 27(6): 574-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25203296

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) at long-term follow-up; a large series of real-life patients underwent revascularization with DCB for a wide spectrum of clinical and angiographic situations. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred ten patients underwent percutaneous revascularization using paclitaxel eluting balloon (Sequent Please, Braun, Germany). End-points were major adverse cardiac events (MACE; all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], target vessel revascularisation [TVR], and vessel thrombosis). DCB were used for stable angina (58%), unstable angina/nonST elevation MI (31%) and ST elevation MI (11%). DCB were used for in-stent restenosis (61%), small vessel disease (25%), with bare metal stent (BMS) to avoid long dual antiplatelet therapy (10%) or for impossibility to place a stent (4%). Cumulative MACE at follow-up (median 23 months, IQR 13-32) was 12.7%, with 8.2% all-cause death (1 fatal MI), 4.5% TVR, 3.6% TLR, and no vessel thrombosis. Three of four TLRs occurred in patients who received DEB for DES restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: DCB are a very effective tool for a variety of clinical and angiographic situations. DCB use seems to be affected by a low rate of complications and adequate results at long-term follow-up.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angina, Stable/therapy , Angina, Unstable/therapy , Coronary Restenosis/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Registries
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...