Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 14(5): e25120, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35733453

ABSTRACT

One of the most common and contagious infectious dermatological pathology is scabies. It is caused by tiny mites and spreads via skin-to-skin contact. It is most prevalent in children, the elderly, and the immunocompromised. Once diagnosed, the individual and all household contacts must be treated. Scabies has conventionally been considered a disease of the developing world and is prevalent in patients from a low socioeconomic status. Herein, we present an interesting case from a tertiary care hospital in North America.

2.
Cureus ; 13(4): e14364, 2021 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33972915

ABSTRACT

Methotrexate is a highly effective medication that is the mainstay of treatment for numerous complex dermatological and rheumatological disorders. However, its use requires close monitoring as it has serious side effects that could be fatal if not recognized promptly. Herein, we present an interesting case of methotrexate toxicity leading to a prolonged hospital stay with resultant increase in health care cost and patient dissatisfaction. It remains of pivotal importance for primary care physicians and hospitalists to be aware of its side effect profile. As such, early recognition of methotrexate toxicity can result in earlier initiation of goal-directed therapies, leading to improved outcomes and shorter hospital stay. Patient education and effective communication between health care providers and the patient are of utmost importance in ensuring patient safety.

3.
Ann Gastroenterol ; 34(2): 235-240, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33654365

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends that N-acetylcysteine (NAC) may be beneficial in non-acetaminophen-related drug-induced liver injury. A subsequent review and analysis reported the current evidence to be inconclusive. Herein, we present an updated review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We evaluated prospective, retrospective and randomized controlled trials that compared outcomes in patients of all ages with acute liver failure (defined as abnormal liver enzymes along with elevated international normalized ratio >1.5, with or without hepatic encephalopathy) receiving NAC with the outcomes in a control group. The primary outcome was to compare the overall survival in the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes included difference in length of hospital stay, transplant-free survival, and post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Seven studies (N=883) that met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. The mean age of patients in the NAC group was 21.22 years compared with 23.62 years in the control group. The odds of overall survival were significantly higher in the NAC group than in controls (odds ratio [OR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.41). Post-transplant survival (OR 2.44, 95%CI 1.11-5.37) and transplant-free survival were also better in the NAC group than in the control group (OR 2.85, 95%CI 2.11-3.85). Patients in the control group had statistically significant odds of a longer inpatient stay (mean difference 7.79, 95%CI 6.93-8.66). CONCLUSION: In patients with non-acetaminophen-related acute liver failure, NAC significantly improves overall survival, post-transplant survival and transplant-free survival while decreasing the overall length of hospital stay.

4.
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect ; 10(6): 508-513, 2020 Oct 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33194119

ABSTRACT

Background COVID-19 infection has become a pandemic and a global health issue since its origin in Wuhan, China in December 2019. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess hematological changes seen in COVID-19 infection and their association with the severity of the disease. Methods Pooled proportions were calculated using both fixed effects model and random effects model. Weighted mean difference and 95% CI were calculated and reported. Results Initial search identified 84 reference articles, 23 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Compared to general population, the weighted mean difference of WBC count in all COVID-19 patients was lower by 0.97 × 109 mm3 (95% CI = -1.29 to -0.66). In severe COVID-19 patients, the weighted mean difference of platelet count was lower by 23.85 × 109/liter (95% CI = -35.18 to -9.53), as compared to general population. The weighted mean difference of prothrombin time, D-Dimer, and fibrinogen in severe COVID-19 patients was higher by 1.92 seconds (95% CI = 0.01 to 3.84), 6.23 mg/liter (95% CI = 0.11 to 12.36) and 1.88 g/liter (95% CI = 1.18 to 2.48) respectively, as compared to general population. Pooled proportion showed D-Dimer to be elevated in 80.00% (95 % CI = 50.00 to 99.00) of severe patients. Conclusions Our meta-analysis shows that patients with COVID-19 have significant thrombocytopenia, leukopenia along with elevated D-dimer, fibrinogen and prothrombin time. These laboratory findings are marked in severe COVID-19 infections and could be helpful in early recognition of severe infection.

5.
Pak J Med Sci ; 32(6): 1459-1463, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28083045

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the change in interviewers' perception of Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) after MMI training and after actual MMI experience. METHODS: Six sessions were conducted during two weeks (October 26, 2015- to November 6, 2015) to a total of 87 faculty members. The evaluation dealt with 13 items questionnaire for representation of assessors' perception on 5 point rating scale. Assessors rated their perceptions to complete an anonymised questionnaire about rationale behind MMI, the process of MMI, and the use of scoring criteria (rubrics). In addition, assessors were also asked to rate their level of satisfaction on MMI process after training and after interviews. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test (two-tailed) was used to compare participant's pre- and post-interview ratings. RESULTS: With 81.6% response rate, the positive views of assessors about the MMI selection process and the use of scoring criteria (Rubric) to assess the candidate are not altered after experiencing a MMI selection day (p> 0.001). Assessors (87%) would prefer to be involved in the process of MMI in future. CONCLUSION: The outstanding consistency of assessors' ratings before and after interview concluded that MMI training sessions were helpful in improving knowledge and skills about MMI process and candidates' assessment criteria (rubrics).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...