Hydrogel-mediated DNA delivery confers estrogenic response in nonresponsive osteoblast cells.

Oligo(polyethylene glycol) fumarate (OPF) hydrogel has been employed in musculoskeletal tissue engineering for photoencapsulation of chondrocytes and as a matrix for marrow stromal cells differentiation. In this study, we have studied the application of OPF hydrogel for coencapsulation of DNA and bone cells and examined whether coencapsulation can enhance gene transfer by maintaining the DNA within the cellular microenvironment. Our results showed that plasmid DNA encoding green fluorescence protein (GFP), coencapsulated with bone tumor cells, was capable of transfecting the cells, and the transfected tumor cells continuously expressed GFP protein over the time course of study (21 days). Furthermore, we have examined the coencapsulation of estrogen receptor (ER) encoding plasmid DNA and human fetal osteoblast cells (hFOB) that lack endogenous ER. Our results show that the transfected cells responded to estrogen as alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and estrogen response element (ERE)-directed luciferase enzyme activities increased with estrogen treatment. Taken together, these studies show that OPF hydrogel could be further explored for targeted gene delivery in bone and other tissues encapsulated within the hydrogels.

2-methoxyestradiol inhibits differentiation and is cytotoxic to osteoclasts.

2-Methoxyestradiol (2-ME), a naturally occurring metabolite of 17beta-estradiol, is highly cytotoxic to a wide range of tumor cells but is harmless to most normal cells. However, 2-ME prevented bone loss in ovariectomized rats, suggesting it inhibits bone resorption. These studies were performed to determine the direct effects of 2-ME on cultured osteoclasts. 2-ME (2 microM) reduced osteoclast number by more than 95% and induced apoptosis in three cultured osteoclast model systems (RAW 264.7 cells cultured with RANKL, marrow cells co-cultured with stromal support cells, and spleen cells cultured without support cells in media supplemented with RANKL and macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF)). The 2-ME-mediated effect was ligand specific; 2-hydroxyestradiol (2-OHE), the immediate precursor to 2-ME, exhibited less cytotoxicity; and 2-methoxyestrone (2-MEOE1) the estrone analog of 2-ME, was not cytotoxic. Co-treatment with ICI 182,780 did not antagonize 2-ME, suggesting that the cytotoxicity was not estrogen receptor-dependent. 2-ME-induced cell death in RAW 264.7 cells coincided with an increase in gene expression of cytokines implicated in inhibition of differentiation and induction of apoptosis. In addition, the 2-ME-mediated decrease in cell survival was partially inhibited by anti-lymphotoxin(LT)beta antibodies, suggesting that 2-ME-dependent effects involve LTbeta. These results suggest that 2-ME could be useful for treating skeletal diseases in which bone resorption is increased, such as postmenopausal osteoporosis and cancer metastasis to bone.

Pressure rinsing of coronary stents immediately before implantation reduces inflammation and neointimal hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates whether rinsing stents with high pressure immediately before implantation minimizes stent-induced inflammation and neointimal formation. BACKGROUND: Several reports indicate that manual stent manipulation before implantation results in foreign body contamination and increased neointimal hyperplasia. METHODS: A stent-cleaning chamber was developed to rinse stents at a sustained hydrodynamic pressure of 4 atm for 10 s. Commercial pre-mounted stents were examined with different levels of manipulation: 1) untouched stents: no stent manipulation before implantation; 2) handled stents: manual stent re-crimping on the balloon; 3) rinsed stents: pressure-rinsed with the stent-cleaning chamber. In vitro surface analysis was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Neointimal hyperplasia and inflammation around stent struts were also assessed in the pig in-stent restenosis model. RESULTS: In vitro analysis revealed fewer contaminants on rinsed stents compared with untouched (p = 0.01) and handled stents (p < 0.001). In vivo, neointimal thickness, neointimal area and vessel percent stenosis were significantly reduced in rinsed, compared with not-rinsed, stents (p = 0.002, p = 0.007, p = 0.008 respectively). In addition, a significant reduction in the inflammatory infiltrate around struts was observed in untouched, compared with handled, stents (p = 0.04) and in rinsed, compared with not-rinsed, stents (p < 0.001). Regression analysis accounting for injury and neointimal thickness showed significant differences in slopes between "handled + not-rinsed" and "handled + rinsed" stents (p = 0.004), and between "untouched + not-rinsed" and "untouched + rinsed stents" (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Rinsing stents under high pressure immediately before coronary implantation results in less inflammation around struts and thinner neointima at 28 days in this pig model.