ABSTRACT
Prostate cancer is a significant health concern for men, emphasizing the need for effective treatment strategies. Dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy shows promise in improving outcomes but presents challenges due to radiation effects on nearby structures, such as the rectum. Innovative techniques, including rectal spacers, have emerged to mitigate these effects. This study comprehensively assessed tissue responses following the implantation of the Bioprotect biodegradable fillable balloon as a rectal spacer in a rat model. Evaluation occurred at multiple time points (4, 26, and 52 weeks) post-implantation. Results revealed localized tissue responses consistent with the expected reaction to biodegradable materials, characterized by mild to moderate fibrotic reactions and encapsulation, underscoring the safety and biocompatibility of the balloon. Importantly, no other adverse events occurred, and the animals remained healthy throughout the study. These findings support its potential clinical utility in radiotherapy treatments to enhance patient outcomes and minimize long-term implant-related complications, serving as a benchmark for future similar studies and offering valuable insights for researchers in the field. In conclusion, the findings from this study highlight the safety, biocompatibility, and potential clinical applicability of the Bioprotect biodegradable fillable balloon as a promising rectal spacer in mitigating radiation-induced complications during prostate cancer radiotherapy.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Hypofractionation schemes and associated higher rectal doses have evoked the need for improved protection of the rectum during prostate cancer irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An implantable, biodegradable, inflatable, preshaped triangular balloon of commercially used poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) co-polymer material was developed to provide separation between prostate and rectum. Biocompatibility and degradability of the balloon implanted subcutaneously or perineally, and in the context of transperineal implantation and local irradiation were evaluated in several in vivo studies. RESULTS: The device was found to be biocompatible in subcutaneously implanted rabbits up to 42 days, in a transperineally implanted dog up to 12 months and in 8 transperineally implanted pigs up to 6 months. Upon inflation in situ the balloon separated the tissues, remained inflated for several months and subsequently biodegraded. No systemic or local toxicity was noted, as shown by histopathology. Device insertion into the perineal area using a dedicated introductory kit was convenient and feasible. Three-month followup in irradiated pigs that received 15 Gy in 3 fractions 1 week apart showed a stable balloon position with no local or systemic side effects. CONCLUSIONS: This novel device was safe and effective for its intended use of separating tissues for a desired duration. A clinical study will commence to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this device during irradiation in patients with prostate cancer.
