Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Res Metr Anal ; 8: 1100845, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37008287

ABSTRACT

Based on the polar polynya-related 1,677 publications derived from the Web of Science from 1980 to 2021, this study analyses the scientific performance of polar polynya research with respect to publication outputs, scientific categories, journals, productive countries and partnerships, co-cited references, bibliographic documents and the thermal trends of keywords. The number of publications and citations on polar polynya has increased 17.28 and 11.22% annually since the 1990s, respectively, and those numbers for Antarctic polynya have surpassed that of the Arctic polynya since 2014. Oceanography, geosciences multidisciplinary, and environmental sciences were the top 3 scientific categories in the Arctic and Antarctic polynya research field. Nevertheless, ecology and meteorology are gaining ground in the Arctic and the Antarctic recently. The Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans accommodated most publications for both polar regions, followed by Deep-Sea Research Part II-Topical Studies in Oceanography and Polar Biology. The Continental Shelf Research and Ocean Modeling were favored journals in Arctic and Antarctic polynya research, respectively. The USA dominated the polar polynya study field with 31.74%/43.60% publications on the Arctic/Antarctic polynya research, followed by Canada (40.23%/4.32%) and Germany (17.21%/11.22%). Besides, Australia occupied the second most popular position in the Antarctic polynya research. The keywords analysis concluded that the polynya topics that generated the most interest were altered from model to climate change in the Arctic and ocean water and glacier in the Antarctic over time. This study gives a summary of the polar polynya scientific field through bibliometric analysis which may provide reference for future research.

2.
Andrologia ; 53(7): e14084, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33930204

ABSTRACT

We aimed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) injection in the glans penis for the treatment of persistent premature ejaculation (PE). Eighty patients with persistent PE were divided equally into two groups. In group A, patients underwent HA injection by four-inlet injection technique, while in group B, patients were subjected to saline injection in glans penis by the same method as a control group. Patients were followed up for six months. At the end of follow-up, the IELT significantly improved in the HA injection group, as compared to the baseline values and control group. The maximal glandular circumference significantly increased at the 1st, 3rd and 6th month of follow-up. The rate of patient satisfaction with sexual intercourse was 64.9%, 70.3% and 78.4% at the 1st, 3rd and 6th month of follow-up, respectively. Besides, the partner satisfaction with sexual intercourse was 54.1%, 48.6% and 59.5% at the 1st, 3rd and 6th month of follow-up, respectively. In conclusion, HA injection may represent a promising treatment modality for persistent PE.


Subject(s)
Hyaluronic Acid , Premature Ejaculation , Coitus , Ejaculation , Humans , Male , Penis , Premature Ejaculation/drug therapy , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...