Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Can J Cardiol ; 22(9): 749-54, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16835668

ABSTRACT

Heart failure affects over 500,000 Canadians, and 50,000 new patients are diagnosed each year. The mortality remains staggering, with a five-year age-adjusted rate of 45%. Disease management programs for heart failure patients have been associated with improved outcomes, the use of evidence-based therapies, improved quality of care, and reduced costs, mortality and hospitalizations. Currently, national benchmarks and targets for access to care for cardiovascular procedures or office consultations do not exist. The present paper summarizes the currently available data, particularly focusing on the risk of adverse events as a function of waiting time, as well as on the identification of gaps in existing data on heart failure. Using best evidence and expert consensus, the present article also focuses on timely access to care for acute and chronic heart failure, including timely access to heart failure disease management programs and physician care (heart failure specialists, cardiologists, internists and general practitioners).


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Heart Failure/therapy , Patient Selection , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Time Factors
3.
Can J Cardiol ; 21(14): 1272-6, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16341295

ABSTRACT

In 2004, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society formed an Access to Care Working Group with a mandate to use the best science and information available to establish reasonable triage categories and safe wait times for common cardiovascular services and procedures through a series of commentaries. The present commentary is the first in the series and lays out issues regarding timely access to care that are common to all cardiovascular services and procedures. The commentary briefly describes the 'right' to timely access, wait lists as a health care system management tool, and the role of the physician as patient advocate and gatekeeper. It also provides advice to funders, administrators and providers who must monitor and manage wait times to improve access to cardiovascular care in Canada and restore the confidence of Canadians in their publicly funded health care system.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Health Services Accessibility , National Health Programs , Patient Rights , Referral and Consultation , Canada , Gatekeeping , Health Care Rationing , Health Priorities , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Patient Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Responsibility , Time Factors , Triage , Universal Health Insurance , Waiting Lists
4.
Can J Cardiol ; 21(13): 1149-55, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16308588

ABSTRACT

In 2004, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society formed an Access to Care Working Group with a mandate to use the best science and information available to establish reasonable triage categories and safe wait times for common cardiovascular services and procedures through a series of commentaries. The present commentary discusses the rationale for access benchmarks for urgent cardiac catheterization and revascularization, including hospital transfer in the setting of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. The literature on standards of care, wait times, wait list management and clinical trials was reviewed. A survey of all cardiac catheterization directors in Canada was performed to develop an inventory of current practices in identifying and triaging patients. The Working Group recommended the following medically acceptable wait times for access to diagnostic catheterization and revascularization in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes: for diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention, the target should be 24 h to 48 h for high-risk, three to five days for intermediate-risk and five to seven days for low-risk patients; for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, the target should be three to five days for high-risk, two to three weeks for intermediate-risk and six weeks for low-risk patients. All stakeholders must affirm the appropriateness of these standards and work continuously to achieve them. However, some questions remain around what are the best clinical risk markers to delineate the triage categories and the utility of clinical risk scores to assist clinicians in triaging patients for invasive therapies.


Subject(s)
Angina, Unstable/therapy , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Triage/standards , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Benchmarking , Canada , Cardiac Catheterization , Coronary Artery Bypass , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Patient Transfer , Risk Assessment , Syndrome , Time Factors , Waiting Lists
5.
Can J Cardiol ; 21 Suppl A: 19A-24A, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15953940

ABSTRACT

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society is the national professional society for cardiovascular specialists and researchers in Canada. In the spring of 2004, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Council formed an Access to Care Working Group in an effort to use the best science and information to establish reasonable triage categories and safe wait times for access to common cardiovascular services and procedures. The Working Group has elected to publish a series of commentaries to initiate a structured national discussion on this very important issue. Access to treatment with implantable cardioverter defibrillators is the subject of the present commentary. The prevalence pool of potentially eligible patients is discussed, along with access barriers, regional disparities and waiting times. A maximum recommended waiting time is proposed and the framework for a solution-oriented approach is presented.


Subject(s)
Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Defibrillators, Implantable , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Canada , Humans , Time Factors , Waiting Lists
6.
Can J Nurs Leadersh ; 15(1): 8-13, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11908543

ABSTRACT

This article presents the results of a nursing survey of cardiac care hospitals undertaken by a Cardiac Care Network of Ontario Consensus Panel on Cardiovascular Human Resources. The focus of the Panel was to identify areas of current or pending shortages in human resources and make recommendations to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care about human resource management in adult cardiac care in Ontario. The article presents the number and mix of full-time, part-time and casual nursing staff, the age distribution of RNs, and the number of vacant Registered Nurse (RN) positions for a sample of cardiac care hospitals in Ontario. Next a sample of Chief Nursing Officer opinions about factors contributing to current difficulties in recruiting RNs and the outlook for future shortages are presented. Implications for nurse managers are offered, including development of new recruitment and retention strategies, identification of further efficiencies in care provision, and a need for nurse manager involvement in debates about the future of how health care is provided in Canada.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Care Facilities , Nursing Staff/supply & distribution , Humans , Nurse Administrators , Ontario , Personnel Selection , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workforce
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...