Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Matern Child Health J ; 17(5): 862-8, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22736032

ABSTRACT

Maternal and newborn death is common in Sierra Leone; significant reductions in both maternal and newborn mortality require universal access to a skilled attendant during labor and delivery. When too few women use health facilities MDGs 4 and 5 targets will not be met. Our objectives were to identify why women use services provided by TBAs as compared to health facilities; and to suggest strategies to improve utilization of health facilities for maternity and newborn care services. Qualitative data from focus group discussions in communities adjacent to health facilities collected during the 2008 Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care Needs Assessment were analyzed for themes relating to decision-making on the utilization of TBAs or health facilities. The prohibitive cost of services, and the geographic inaccessibility of health facilities discouraged women from using them while trust in the vast experience of TBAs as well as their compassionate care drew patients to them. Poor facility infrastructure, often absent staff, and the perception that facilities were poorly stocked and could not provide continuum of care services were barriers to facility utilization for maternity and newborn care. Improvements in infrastructure and the 24-hour provision of free, quality, comprehensive, and respectful care will minimize TBA preference in Sierra Leone.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/psychology , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Midwifery , Adolescent , Adult , Choice Behavior , Decision Making , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Female , Focus Groups , Health Facilities , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Interviews as Topic , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Quality of Health Care , Sierra Leone , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
3.
Pan Afr Med J ; 13 Suppl 1: 3, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23467647

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: AMREF (African Medical and Research Foundation) developed a Knowledge Management Strategy that focused on creating, capturing and applying health knowledge to close the gap between communities and health systems in Africa. There was need to identify AMREF's current Knowledge Management implementation status, problems and constraints encountered after two years of enforcement of the strategy and suggest the way forward. METHODS: This study was conducted between October 2011 and February 2012. Quantitative data on number and foci of AMREF research publications were collected using a questionnaire. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were used to gather data on explanations for the trend of publications and the status of the implementation of the 2010-2014 Knowledge Management Strategy. Quantitative data was analysed using SPSS computer software whereas content analysis of themes was employed on qualitative data. RESULTS: Between 1960 and 2011, AMREF produced 257 peer reviewed publications, 158 books and manuals and about 1,188 technical publications including evaluations, guidelines and technical reports. However, the numbers of publications declined from around the year 2000. Large quantities of unpublished and unclassified materials are also in the custody of Heritage. Barriers to Knowledge Management included: lack of incentives for documentation and dissemination; limited documentation and use of good practices in programming; and superficial attention to results or use of evidence. CONCLUSION: Alternative ways of reorganizing Knowledge Management will enable AMREF to use evidence-based knowledge to advocate for appropriate changes in African health policies and practices.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Knowledge Management , Research/statistics & numerical data , Africa , Data Collection , Documentation , Evidence-Based Medicine , Focus Groups , Health Policy , Humans , Publications/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
4.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 114(2): 168-73, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21705000

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a needs assessment for emergency obstetric care (EmOC) to address the unacceptably high maternal and newborn mortality indices in Sierra Leone 8 years after the end of the civil war. METHODS: From June to August 2008, a cross-sectional survey was conducted of health facilities in Sierra Leone offering delivery services. Assessment tools were local adaptations of tools developed by the Averting Maternal Death and Disability program at Columbia University, New York, USA. RESULTS: There were enough comprehensive EmOC (CEmOC) facilities in the country but they were poorly distributed. There were no basic EmOC (BEmOC) facilities. Few facilities (37% of hospitals and 2% of health centers) were able to perform assisted vaginal delivery (AVD), and 3 potentially BEmOC facilities did not meet the standard only because they did not perform AVD. Severe shortages in staff, equipment, and supplies, and unsatisfactory supply of utilities severely hampered the delivery of quality EmOC services. Demand for maternity and newborn services was low, which may have been related to the poor quality and the high/unpredictable out-of-pocket cost of such services. CONCLUSION: Significant increases in the uptake of institutional delivery services, the linkage of remote health workers to the health system, and the recruitment of midwives, in addition to rapid expansion in the training of health workers (including training in midwifery and obstetric surgery skills), are urgently needed to improve the survival of mothers and newborns.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Infant Mortality/ethnology , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Maternal Health Services , Maternal Mortality/trends , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Surveys , Health Personnel/economics , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Infant Mortality/trends , Infant, Newborn , Midwifery/economics , Midwifery/organization & administration , Needs Assessment/economics , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , Pregnancy , Quality of Health Care/economics , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Sierra Leone , Workforce
5.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 106(1): 89-94, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19428010

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: WHO, UNICEF, and UNFPA with other development partners have supported African Ministries of Health to institutionalize maternal death review (MDR) since 2003. To evaluate the program, its status, lessons learned, and the challenges to success were reviewed in 2007. METHODS: A standard self-administered questionnaire was sent to Ministries of Health in 46 Sub-Saharan African countries in May 2007. Completed questionnaires were returned by e-mail, processed, and analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty countries completed the survey questionnaire. Maternal death is a notifiable condition in 21 (67%) counties. A national committee has been set up to plan, coordinate, and implement MDR activities in 7 countries. Fifteen countries stated that facility-based MDR is the main method selected for conducting reviews of the causes of maternal death. Fourteen (47%) countries reported that national MDR guidelines had been developed and 12 (40%) had implemented the guidelines. Fifteen (50%) countries reported that maternal deaths were reviewed and analyzed. Only 7 countries reported that the government had allocated a budget for MDR. Implementation of MDR has led to local policy changes and improvement in quality of maternal health services in several countries. Ten of the 15 countries in which analysis has been conducted reported that recommendations have been implemented at least at the health facility level. CONCLUSION: Although use of MDR is increasing in African countries, effective coverage is still low. The institutionalization of MDR requires political commitment, legal and administrative back-up, financial support, capacity development, simplified reporting forms and procedures, coordinated support of development partners, involvement of professional bodies, and regular supportive follow-up.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services/standards , Maternal Mortality , Pregnancy Complications/mortality , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology , Budgets/statistics & numerical data , Cause of Death , Female , Financing, Government/statistics & numerical data , Guidelines as Topic , Health Policy , Humans , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Quality of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...