ABSTRACT
This study examines the effects of a mental health carve-out on a sample of continuously enrolled employees (N = 1,943) over a four-year time frame (1990-1994). The article presents a health care services utilization model of the effect of the carve-out on outpatient mental health use, cost, and source of payment in the three years post implementation relative to the year prior to the carve-out model. In the first three years of the carve-out, the likelihood of employees seeking mental health care increased in significant part because of the carve-out. For the outpatient mental health services user, the carve-out was not associated with the level of mental health services received. The carve-out was significantly associated over time with a reduction in the patient's and employer's mental health costs. This effect was more pronounced in the second and third years of the carve-out. The article explores the policy implications of these and other findings.
Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy/economics , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Mental Health Services/economics , Preferred Provider Organizations/economics , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Preferred Provider Organizations/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
Using 1985 and 1988 American Hospital Association data, this study examines 1,523 hospitals nationwide and concludes that hospitals' ownership of skilled nursing facilities helps minimize the transaction costs associated with post-acute patient transfers while productively using empty hospital beds. Unfortunately, such ownership creates complex cost, quality, and accessibility trade-offs in terms of the skilled nursing care provided.
