Bisoprolol in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease at High Risk of Exacerbation: The BICS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Observational studies report that ß-blocker use may be associated with reduced risk of COPD exacerbations. However, a recent trial reported that metoprolol did not reduce COPD exacerbations and increased COPD exacerbations requiring hospital admission. Objective: To test whether bisoprolol decreased COPD exacerbations in people with COPD at high risk of exacerbations. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Bisoprolol in COPD Study (BICS) was a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted in 76 UK sites (45 primary care clinics and 31 secondary clinics). Patients with COPD who had at least moderate airflow obstruction on spirometry (ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration [FEV1] to forced vital capacity <0.7; FEV1 <80% predicted) and at least 2 COPD exacerbations treated with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or both in the prior 12 months were enrolled from October 17, 2018, to May 31, 2022. Follow-up concluded on April 18, 2023. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to bisoprolol (n = 261) or placebo (n = 258). Bisoprolol was started at 1.25 mg orally daily and was titrated as tolerated during 4 sessions to a maximum dose of 5 mg/d, using a standardized protocol. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary clinical outcome was the number of patient-reported COPD exacerbations treated with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or both during the 1-year treatment period. Safety outcomes included serious adverse events and adverse reactions. Results: Although the trial planned to enroll 1574 patients, recruitment was suspended from March 16, 2020, to July 31, 2021, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Two patients in each group were excluded postrandomization. Among the 515 patients (mean [SD] age, 68 [7.9] years; 274 men [53%]; mean FEV1, 50.1%), primary outcome data were available for 514 patients (99.8%) and 371 (72.0%) continued taking the study drug. The primary outcome of patient-reported COPD exacerbations treated with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or both was 526 in the bisoprolol group, with a mean exacerbation rate of 2.03/y, vs 513 exacerbations in the placebo group, with a mean exacerbation rate of 2.01/y. The adjusted incidence rate ratio was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.84-1.13; P = .72). Serious adverse events occurred in 37 of 255 patients in the bisoprolol group (14.5%) vs 36 of 251 in the placebo group (14.3%; relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-1.66; P = .96). Conclusions and Relevance: Among people with COPD at high risk of exacerbation, treatment with bisoprolol did not reduce the number of self-reported COPD exacerbations requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or both. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN10497306.

Bisoprolol versus celiprolol on dynamic hyperinflation, cardiopulmonary exercise and domiciliary safety in COPD: a single-centre, randomised, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently associated with cardiovascular disease. The utility of beta-blockers for treating patients with COPD may be beneficial, but their safety remains uncertain, including worsening of dynamic hyperinflation (DH) during exercise. We hypothesised that among cardioselective beta-blockers celiprolol, due to its partial beta-2 agonist activity, may be safer than bisoprolol on exercise DH. METHODS: We measured isotime inspiratory capacity (IC) during cycle endurance testing in eleven moderate-severe COPD subjects, alongside other non-invasive cardiopulmonary exercise, bioreactance cardiac output, pulmonary function, biomarkers and daily domiciliary measures. Participants received titrated doses of either bisoprolol (maximim 5 mg) or celiprolol (maximum 400 mg) in randomised crossover fashion, each over 4 weeks. RESULTS: Clinically relevant DH occurred between resting and exercise isotime IC but showed no significant difference with either beta-blocker compared with post-run-in pooled baseline or between treatments. There were no other significant differences observed for remaining exercise ventilatory; non-invasive cardiac output; resting pulmonary function; beta-2 receptor and cardiac biomarkers; domiciliary pulmonary function, oxygen saturation and symptom outcomes, either between treatments or compared with baseline. No significant adverse effects occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Significant DH in moderate-severe COPD subjects was no different between bisoprolol or celiprolol or versus baseline. A broad spectrum of other non-invasive cardiopulmonary and domiciliary safety outcomes was equally reassuring. Bronchoprotection with a concomitant long-acting muscarinic antagonist might be an important safety measure in this context. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02380053.

Use of the oral beta blocker bisoprolol to reduce the rate of exacerbation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a randomised controlled trial (BICS).

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Beta blockers are well-established drugs widely used to treat cardiovascular conditions. Observational studies consistently report that beta blocker use in people with COPD is associated with a reduced risk of COPD exacerbations. The bisoprolol in COPD study (BICS) investigates whether adding bisoprolol to routine COPD treatment has clinical and cost-effective benefits. A sub-study will risk stratify participants for heart failure to investigate whether any beneficial effect of bisoprolol is restricted to those with unrecognised heart disease. METHODS: BICS is a pragmatic randomised parallel group double-blind placebo-controlled trial conducted in UK primary and secondary care sites. The major inclusion criteria are an established predominant respiratory diagnosis of COPD (post-bronchodilator FEV1 < 80% predicted, FEV1/FVC < 0.7), a self-reported history of ≥ 2 exacerbations requiring treatment with antibiotics and/or oral corticosteroids in a 12-month period since March 2019, age ≥ 40 years and a smoking history ≥ 10 pack years. A computerised randomisation system will allocate 1574 participants with equal probability to intervention or control groups, stratified by centre and recruitment in primary/secondary care. The intervention is bisoprolol (1.25 mg tablets) or identical placebo. The dose of bisoprolol/placebo is titrated up to a maximum of 4 tablets a day (5 mg bisoprolol) over 4-7 weeks depending on tolerance to up-dosing of bisoprolol/placebo-these titration assessments are completed by telephone or video call. Participants complete the remainder of the 52-week treatment period on the final titrated dose (1, 2, 3, 4 tablets) and during that time are followed up at 26 and 52 weeks by telephone or video call. The primary outcome is the total number of participant reported COPD exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics during the 52-week treatment period. A sub-study will risk stratify participants for heart failure by echocardiography and measurement of blood biomarkers. DISCUSSION: The demonstration that bisoprolol reduces the incidence of exacerbations would be relevant not only to patients and clinicians but also to healthcare providers, in the UK and globally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN10497306 . Registered on 16 August 2018.

Tunable Surface Repellency Maintains Stemness and Redox Capacity of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) hold great promise for regenerative medicine due to their multipotent differentiation capacity and immunomodulatory capabilities. Substantial research has elucidated mechanisms by which extracellular cues regulate hMSC fate decisions, but considerably less work has addressed how material properties can be leveraged to maintain undifferentiated stem cells. Here, we show that synthetic culture substrates designed to exhibit moderate cell-repellency promote high stemness and low oxidative stress-two indicators of naïve, healthy stem cells-in commercial and patient-derived hMSCs. Furthermore, the material-mediated effect on cell behavior can be tuned by altering the molar percentage (mol %) and/or chain length of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), the repellant block linked to hydrophobic poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) in the copolymer backbone. Nano- and angstrom-scale characterization of the cell-material interface reveals that PEG interrupts the adhesive PCL domains in a chain-length-dependent manner; this prevents hMSCs from forming mature focal adhesions and subsequently promotes cell-cell adhesions that require connexin-43. This study is the first to demonstrate that intrinsic properties of synthetic materials can be tuned to regulate the stemness and redox capacity of hMSCs and provides new insight for designing highly scalable, programmable culture platforms for clinical translation.

Design and use of mouse control DNA for DNA biomarker extraction and PCR detection from urine: Application for transrenal Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection.

Urine samples are increasingly used for diagnosing infections including Escherichia coli, Ebola virus, and Zika virus. However, extraction and concentration of nucleic acid biomarkers from urine is necessary for many molecular detection strategies such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Since urine samples typically have large volumes with dilute biomarker concentrations making them prone to false negatives, another impediment for urine-based diagnostics is the establishment of appropriate controls particularly to rule out false negatives. In this study, a mouse glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) DNA target was added to retrospectively collected urine samples from tuberculosis (TB)-infected and TB-uninfected patients to indicate extraction of intact DNA and removal of PCR inhibitors from urine samples. We tested this design on surrogate urine samples, retrospective 1milliliter (mL) urine samples from patients in Lima, Peru and retrospective 5mL urine samples from patients in Cape Town, South Africa. Extraction/PCR control DNA was detectable in 97% of clinical samples with no statistically significant differences among groups. Despite the inclusion of this control, there was no difference in the amount of TB IS6110 Tr-DNA detected between TB-infected and TB-uninfected groups except for samples from known HIV-infected patients. We found an increase in TB IS6110 Tr-DNA between TB/HIV co-infected patients compared to TB-uninfected/HIV-infected patients (N=18, p=0.037). The inclusion of an extraction/PCR control DNA to indicate successful DNA extraction and removal of PCR inhibitors should be easily adaptable as a sample preparation control for other acellular sample types.

Inhaled corticosteroid dose response in asthma: Should we measure inflammation?

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) titration in asthma is primarily based on symptoms and pulmonary function. ICSs may not be increased on this basis despite residual airway inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the dose-response relationships of ICSs on measures of pulmonary function, symptoms, and inflammation in patients with persistent asthma. METHODS: We performed a pooled post hoc analysis of 121 patients with mild to moderate asthma from 4 randomized clinical trials that incorporated an ICS dose ramp. Dose ramps were 0 to 200, 0 to 800, and 200 to 800 µg/d (beclomethasone equivalents). Outcome measures included spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), symptoms, serum eosinophilic cationic protein, and blood eosinophils. RESULTS: We found a plateau beyond a small improvement at 0 to 200 µg for forced expiratory volume in 1 second: 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-4.7%) at 0 to 200 µg vs 0.3% (95% CI, -0.8% to 1.4%) 200 to 800 µg (P = .001). A similar plateau was seen for symptom improvement beyond 0 to 200 µg. Inflammatory and AHR outcomes revealed further room for improvement beyond low-dose ICSs. There was dose-related suppression (P < .001) for fractional exhaled nitric oxide: 40.4 ppb (95% CI, 34.7-46.9 ppb) for ICS free, 26.8 ppb (95% CI, 23.4-30.2 ppb) for 200 µg, and 20.8 ppb (95% CI, 18.8-23.1 ppb) for 800 µg. Eosinophilic cationic protein concentration was significantly reduced with both higher dose ramps. Eosinophil counts also improved across all 3 dose ramps, with dose separation of 370/µL (95% CI, 280-450/µL) for ICS free vs 250/µL (95% CI, 200-300/µL) 800 µg (P = .03). AHR improved with all 3 dose ramps, with greater improvement at lower doses for indirect vs direct challenges. CONCLUSION: ICS dose response may extend beyond low dose for inflammation and AHR but not symptoms or spirometry. Further study is required to identify whether this correlates with suboptimal longitudinal asthma control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00667992, NCT00995657, NCT01216579, NCT01544634.

Is Gly16Arg ß2 Receptor Polymorphism Related to Impulse Oscillometry in a Real-Life Asthma Clinic Setting?

PURPOSE: We evaluated whether Gly16Arg beta2-receptor genotype relates to impulse oscillometry (IOS) in a real-life clinic setting. METHODS: Patients with persistent asthma taking inhaled corticosteroid ± long-acting beta-agonist (ICS ± LABA) were evaluated. We compared genotype groups comprising either no Arg copies (i.e. GlyGly) versus one or two Arg copies (i.e. ArgArg or ArgGly). IOS outcomes included total airway resistance at 5 Hz (R5), central airway resistance at 20 Hz (R20), peripheral airway resistance (R5-R20), reactance at 5 Hz, area under reactance curve (AX) and resonant frequency (RF). In addition, we recorded ACQ-5 and salbutamol use. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve ICS-treated asthmatic patients (mean ICS dose 1238 µg/day), mean age 43 years, ACQ 2.34, FEV1 82 %, R5 177 % were identified-89 were also taking LABA. 61 patients were GlyGly, while 14 were ArgArg and 37 were ArgGly. There were no significant differences in IOS outcomes, ACQ or salbutamol use between the genotypes. The allelic risk (as odds ratio) for less well-controlled asthma (as ACQ > 1.5) was 1.1 (95 % CI 0.72-1.68) in relation to each Arg copy with a corresponding odds ratio for abnormal R5-R20 > 0.07kPA/l.s being 0.91 (95 % CI 0.57-1.44). 71 % of patients had an ACQ > 1.5 in the GlyGly group, versus 67 % in GlyArg/ArgArg group, with corresponding figures for abnormal R5-R20 > 0.07 kPa/l.s being 69 versus 73 %. CONCLUSION: In a real-life clinic setting for patients with poorly controlled persistent asthma taking ICS ± LABA, we found no evidence of any relationship of Gly16Arg to IOS, ACQ or salbutamol use.

Automated Device for Asynchronous Extraction of RNA, DNA, or Protein Biomarkers from Surrogate Patient Samples.

Many biomarker-based diagnostic methods are inhibited by nontarget molecules in patient samples, necessitating biomarker extraction before detection. We have developed a simple device that purifies RNA, DNA, or protein biomarkers from complex biological samples without robotics or fluid pumping. The device design is based on functionalized magnetic beads, which capture biomarkers and remove background biomolecules by magnetically transferring the beads through processing solutions arrayed within small-diameter tubing. The process was automated by wrapping the tubing around a disc-like cassette and rotating it past a magnet using a programmable motor. This device recovered biomarkers at ~80% of the operator-dependent extraction method published previously. The device was validated by extracting biomarkers from a panel of surrogate patient samples containing clinically relevant concentrations of (1) influenza A RNA in nasal swabs, (2) Escherichia coli DNA in urine, (3) Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in sputum, and (4) Plasmodium falciparum protein and DNA in blood. The device successfully extracted each biomarker type from samples representing low levels of clinically relevant infectivity (i.e., 7.3 copies/µL of influenza A RNA, 405 copies/µL of E. coli DNA, 0.22 copies/µL of TB DNA, 167 copies/µL of malaria parasite DNA, and 2.7 pM of malaria parasite protein).

Usefulness of impulse oscillometry for the assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness in mild-to-moderate adult asthma.

BACKGROUND: Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a novel method of assessing airway resistance. IOS is rarely used in assessing airway resistance after bronchoprovocation in adult asthma. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the degree of change in IOS measurements seen in patients with asthma undergoing bronchial challenge testing. METHODS: Patients 18 to 65 years old with mild to moderate asthma, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) greater than 80% predicted, and diurnal FEV1 variation less than 30% and taking inhaled corticosteroid (≤1,000 µg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate equivalent dose) were recruited. Sequential spirometry and IOS results were measured during bronchial challenge testing to inhaled methacholine and histamine. RESULTS: The magnitude of percentage of change demonstrated in total airway resistance at 5 Hz was greater than that observed for FEV1 in the 2 bronchial challenge tests. For example, at a methacholine provocation concentration that caused a decrease in FEV1 of 20%, a 43.5% change (95% confidence interval 29.4-57.5) was seen in total airway resistance at 5 Hz as measured by IOS compared with a 23.3% change (95% confidence interval 18.7-27.9) in FEV1. The magnitude of change seen with other IOS outcomes, including peripheral airway resistance, area under the curve, and resonant frequency, also was greater compared with spirometry. CONCLUSION: The potential application of IOS in the assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness in adult asthma has been demonstrated. Further population studies are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01074853).

Impact of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy on Survival in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

PURPOSE: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a significant cardiac risk factor, associated with increased mortality. The impact of LVH on mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown. We evaluated the impact of LVH on mortality in COPD patients by measurement of left ventricular dimensions by echocardiography. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study utilizing a NHS database of COPD patients (TARDIS), in Tayside, Scotland (2001-2010), linked with databases regarding echocardiograms, pharmacy prescription, and the General Register Office for Scotland death registry. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to determine hazard ratios for mortality and hospital admissions based upon left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and left ventricular internal diastolic diameter after correction for all available influential covariates. Increased LVIDd was defined as >5.3 cm (female) and >5.9 cm (male). LVH was defined as an LVMI of >95 g/m(2) (female) and >115 g/m(2) (male). RESULTS: 617 patients were included for analysis. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis, 70 (9); mean FEV1 % (SD), 60.6 (19.3); mean resting SaO2 % (SD), 92.7 (10). Mean follow-up 4.5 years. Increased LVIDd was not associated with increased mortality, χ (2)= 0.767, p = 0.381. Increased LVMI was associated with a significant increased risk of mortality, χ (2) = 5.447, p = 0.02 with an adjusted HR (95 % CI) of 1.542 (1.068-2.228), p = 0.021. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of LVH, demonstrated by elevated left ventricular mass index is associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality in COPD patients. Therapeutic interventions are required to address this important modifiable risk factor in COPD patients.

The inverse agonist propranolol confers no corticosteroid-sparing activity in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

The murine asthma model shows that switching off airway ß2 receptors with an inverse agonist may confer anti-inflammatory effects as well as corticosteroid-sparing activity. We have assessed for any corticosteroid-sparing effects of propranolol, an inverse agonist, added to low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) compared with higher dose ICS. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial in mild-to-moderate persistent asthmatic patients was performed. After a run-in (2 weeks) on hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) at 100 µg/day (HFA-BDP100), patients received randomized treatments (4 weeks) with propranolol at 80 mg/day plus HFA-BDP at 100 µg/day compared with placebo plus HFA-BDP at 400 µg/day (HFA-BDP400). Propranolol was up-titrated to 80 mg/day over the initial 2 weeks. Tiotropium was co-administered until 5 days before each histamine challenge (the primary outcome). Sixteen patients completed the study [mean age, 38 years; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), 86.4%; histamine provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), 1.39 mg/ml; ICS dose, 406 µg/day]. Histamine PC20 was unchanged by adding propranolol to HFA-BDP100 compared with baseline (HFA-BDP100) {0.17 doubling dilution (dd) difference [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.58 to 0.92]}, but there was a significant improvement with HFA-BDP400 compared with both baseline [1.05 dd (95% CI: 0.43-1.66); P=0.02], and propranolol+HFA-BDP100 [0.88 dd (95% CI: 0.45-1.30); P=0.006]. Significant improvements were also observed with HFA-BDP400 for exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophils, serum eosinophilic cationic protein and asthma quality-of-life questionnaire symptoms compared with propranolol+HFA-BDP100. Salbutamol recovery post-challenge was partially blunted by propranolol (median prolongation 5 min; P=0.002). Domiciliary evening FEV1 also fell with propranolol+HFA-BDP100 [mean reduction from baseline 0.22 litres (95% CI: 0.10-0.34); P=0.012], whereas Asthma Control Questionnaire remained unchanged. In conclusion, the inverse agonist propranolol produced no improvements when given with low-dose ICS, whereas further significant improvements in airway hyper-responsiveness and inflammation were demonstrated with higher dose ICS. Thus, propranolol does not confer corticosteroid-sparing activity in persistent asthma.

Thrombocytosis is associated with increased short and long term mortality after exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a role for antiplatelet therapy?

INTRODUCTION: Evidence suggests that platelets play a significant role in inflammation in addition to their role in thrombosis. Systemic inflammation is linked to poor short and long term outcomes in COPD. Increased platelet activation has been reported in acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). We investigated whether thrombocytosis is independently associated with poor outcomes following AECOPD. METHODS: An observational cohort study of patients hospitalised with AECOPD was performed. Patients were >40 years with spirometry confirmed COPD admitted between 2009 and 2011. Platelet count was recorded on admission. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included inhospital mortality and cardiovascular events. Analyses were conducted using logistic regression after adjustment for confounding variables. RESULTS: 1343 patients (49% male) were included. Median age was 72 years (IQR 63-79 years). 157 (11.7%) had thrombocytosis. Thrombocytosis was associated with both 1-year mortality and inhospital mortality; OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.29, p=0.030) and OR 2.37 (95% CI 1.29 to 4.34, p=0.005), respectively. Cardiovascular hospitalisation was not significantly increased (OR 1.13 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.76, p=0.600)) in patients with thrombocytosis. Aspirin or clopidogrel treatment correlated with a reduction in 1-year mortality (OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.85, p=0.003)) but not inhospital mortality (OR 0.69 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.11, p=0.124)). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for confounders thrombocytosis was associated with increased 1-year mortality after exacerbation of COPD. Antiplatelet therapy was associated with significantly lower 1-year mortality and may have a protective role to play in patients with AECOPD.

Proof-of-concept evaluation of trough airway hyper-responsiveness following regular racemic or levosalbutamol in genotype-stratified steroid-treated persistent asthmatic patients.

Asthmatic patients receiving ICSs (inhaled corticosteroids) may take frequent add-on therapy with salbutamol despite on-demand prescription. Frequent salbutamol use can be detrimental in asthma. The isomeric formulation of salbutamol and the B2ADR (ß2 adrenoceptor) 16 genotype may also influence this phenomenon. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, triple crossover, proof of concept trial comparing 2 weeks of regular therapy with inhaled racemic salbutamol [200 µg q.i.d. (four times daily)], levosalbutamol (100 µg q.i.d.) or placebo on trough methacholine PC20 [provocative concentration causing 20% fall in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s)] 6 h post-dose (the primary outcome) in 30 persistent asthmatic patients (15 who were Arg16 homozygous and 15 who were Gly16 homozygous) all receiving ICSs. There was no worsening of AHR (airway hyper-responsiveness) at trough to methacholine after 2 weeks regular exposure to either racemic (P=0.53) or levosalbutamol (P=0.84) compared with placebo, nor between genotypes-as dd (doubling dilution) difference in methacholine PC20 from placebo [salbutamol/Arg16=0.36 dd [95% CI (confidence interval), -0.43, 1.15]; salbutamol/Gly16=0.01 dd (95% CI, -0.47, 0.49); levosalbutamol/Arg16=-0.01 dd (95% CI, -0.89, 0.87); and levosalbutamol/Gly16=0.28 dd (95% CI, -0.22, 0.77)]. Both active treatments improved morning PEF (peak expiratory flow) in Gly16 (P=0.04 overall) but not Arg16 (P=0.50 overall) patients, whereas evening PEF improved in both Gly16 (P<0.001 overall) and Arg16 (P=0.006 overall) patients. In conclusion, the regular exposure to either racemic or levosalbutamol for 2 weeks added to ICSs did not cause worsening of AHR at trough compared with placebo; with no difference seen between B2ADR 16 genotypes.

Effects of intravenous and oral ß-blockade in persistent asthmatics controlled on inhaled corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE: Despite their benefits in the treatment of cardiovascular disease, ß-blockers are seldom used to treat asthmatics. We assessed the safety and tolerability of acute dosing with esmolol and propranolol in patients with asthma. DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis of a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial of ß-blocker use in asthma. PATIENTS: Mild-to-moderate asthmatics on inhaled corticosteroids. INTERVENTIONS: Each participant underwent a 6-8 week dose titration of oral propranolol. A subgroup received an intravenous bolus dose of esmolol (0.5 mg/kg). Measurements were recorded pre- and post-esmolol and first dose exposure to 10 mg, 20 mg, and 80 mg of propranolol. Tiotropium was given concurrently with propranolol. Bronchoconstriction was reflected as a fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) or increase in total airway resistance at 5 Hz (R5). RESULTS: 12 patients completed the trial. There were no adverse effects on FEV1% or R5% following intravenous esmolol. There were significant reductions at 2 min post-esmolol in heart rate (-4.7 beats/min (bpm), 95% CI -7.9 to -1.3 bpm; p=0.002) and systolic blood pressure (-5.9 mm Hg, 95% CI -11.4 to -0.4 mm Hg; p=0.03). No bronchoconstriction was seen during up titration following the first dose of 10 mg, 20 mg or 80 mg of propranolol in the presence of tiotropium. No difference in the asthma control questionnaire at 80 mg propranolol was seen versus placebo in the presence of tiotropium. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous esmolol was administered without any adverse effects on pulmonary function in selected, stable, mild-to-moderate asthmatics controlled on inhaled corticosteroids. Tiotropium prevented propranolol induced bronchoconstriction after acute dosing during up-titration to 80 mg with no adverse impact on asthma control.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate chronic dosing effects of propranolol in asthma.

RATIONALE: Unblinded studies have shown improvements in airway hyperresponsiveness with chronic nadolol in steroid-naive patients with asthma. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of chronic nonselective ß-blockade as add-on to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with asthma. METHODS: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial of propranolol in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma receiving ICS was performed. Participants underwent a 6- to 8-week dose titration of propranolol or placebo as tolerated to a maximum of 80 mg per day. Tiotropium was given for the first 4 to 6 weeks of each treatment period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome was methacholine challenge. Secondary outcomes included histamine challenge, pulmonary function, mini-asthma quality of life questionnaire (mini-AQLQ), and asthma control questionnaire (ACQ). Eighteen patients completed (mean [SEM]): age, 36 (4) yr; FEV1%, 93 (2); ICS, 440 (66) µg/d. No significant difference was observed in methacholine or histamine challenge after exposure to propranolol versus placebo. For methacholine challenge, the doubling dilution difference was 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.56 to 0.63), P = 0.89. Albuterol recovery at 20 minutes after histamine challenge was partially attenuated by propranolol versus placebo: FEV1% mean difference, 5.28 (95% CI, 2.54-8.01), P = 0.001. After chronic ß-blockade there was a small worsening in FEV1 % predicted of 2.4% (95% CI, -0.1 to 4.8), P = 0.055. No difference was found for ACQ or mini-AQLQ. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first placebo-controlled study to assess the effects of chronic nonselective ß-blockade in asthma, showing no significant effect of propranolol compared with placebo on either methacholine or histamine airway hyperresponsiveness and no change in ACQ or AQLQ. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01074853).