ABSTRACT
In normal-pressure hydrocephalus, disturbances in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation occur; therefore, understanding CSF dynamics is crucial. The two-dimensional phase-contrast (2D-PC) method, a common approach for visualizing CSF flow on MRI, often presents challenges owing to prominent vein signals and excessively high contrast, hindering the interpretation of morphological information. Therefore, we devised a new imaging method that utilizes T2-weighted high-signal intensification of the CSF and saturation pulses, without requiring specialized imaging sequences. This sequence utilized a T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo combined with multi-phase imaging synchronized with a pulse wave. Optimal imaging conditions (repetition time, presence/absence of fast recovery, and echo time) were determined using self-made contrast and single-plate phantoms to evaluate signal-to-noise ratio, contrast ratio, and spatial resolution. In certain clinical cases of hydrocephalus, confirming CSF flow using 2D-PC was challenging. However, our method enabled the visualization of CSF flow, proving to be useful in understanding the pathophysiology of hydrocephalus.
ABSTRACT
We performed a non-electrocardiogram-gated and non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the lower limb arteries using three-dimensional multishot T1-weighted fast-field echo-echo planar imaging (3D multishot T1-FFE-EPI), and it was optimized the protocol. The image distortion for the change in the EPI factor was calculated using 3.0 T-MRI and MRI phantom. We also calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the femoral artery with a change in the flip angle on images of 8 healthy volunteers. Furthermore, the optimal EPI factor was determined from the SNR of the femoral artery and the contrast ratio between the femoral artery and the adductor magnus. Two radiological technologists performed a retrospective visual assessment of the pelvis, thigh, and leg of 10 patients who underwent lower limb non-contrast-enhanced MRA and contrast-enhanced tomography angiography (CTA). The optimum flip angle and EPI factor were 25° and 3, respectively. In the visual assessment of clinical cases, there was no significant difference between the non-contrast-enhanced MRA and contrast-enhanced CTA in the pelvis and the leg (p=0.52 and p=0.88, respectively). In the thigh, non-contrast-enhanced MRA was significantly higher (p=0.02), namely, the ability to visualize the lower limb arteries was not much difference between this method and contrast-enhanced CTA. Our method without electrocardiogram gated and contrast medium is expected for screening tests or detailed examinations.
