Close-Range Fire Inflicting Behind Armor Blunt Trauma: Case-Series and Implications for Battlefield Care.

Behind armor blunt trauma (BABT) is a non-penetrating injury caused by energy transfer and rapid deformation of protective body armor. Although modern military body armor is designed to prevent penetrating trunk injuries, high-energy projectiles can produce a significant energy transfer to tissues behind the armor and inflict injuries such as fractures or organ contusions. However, knowledge of BABT is limited to biomechanical and cadaver modeling studies and rare case reports. We report two cases of BABT resulting from close-range fire and discuss the potential implications for triaging patients with BABT in battlefield scenarios. In the first case, a 19-year-old male soldier sustained a single close-range 5.56-mm assault rifle gunshot to his chest body armor. The soldier initially reported mild pain in the parasternal region and assessment revealed a 4 cm × 3 cm skin abrasion. Following emergency department evaluation, the soldier was diagnosed with a non-displaced transverse fracture of the sternal body. In the second case, a 20-year-old male sustained five machine gun bullets (7.62 mm) to his body armor. Computed tomography of the chest revealed pulmonary contusions in the right lower and middle lobes. Both soldiers achieved full recovery and returned to combat duty within several weeks. These cases highlight the potential risks of energy transfer from high-velocity projectiles impacting body armor and the need for frontline providers to be aware of the risk of underlying blunt injuries. Further reporting of clinical cases and modeling studies using high-velocity projectiles could inform recommendations for triaging, evacuating, and assessing individuals with BABT.

Myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination - A case series.

There have been reports of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. We surveyed all hospitalized military personnel in the Isareli Defense Forces during the period of the COVID-19 vaccination operation (12/28/2021-3/7/2021) for diagnosed myocarditis. We identified 7 cases of myocarditis with symptoms starting in the first week after the second dose of COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. One case of myocarditis diagnosed 10 days after the second dose of the vaccine was not included. These 8 cases comprise of all events of myocarditis diagnosed in military personnel during this time period. All patients were young and generally healthy. All had mild disease with no sequalae. The incidence of myocarditis in the week following a second dose of the vaccine was 5.07/100,000 people vaccinated. Due to the nature of this report no causality could be established. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of myocarditis following Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination. True incidence rates should be further investigated.

Slack Reducing Band Improves Combat Application Tourniquet Pressure Profile and Hemorrhage Control Rate.

BACKGROUND: The Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT) is the tourniquet of choice in the Israeli defense forces. Applying the device loosely before windlass twisting is a main pitfall in CAT application. This study objective is to assess the effectiveness of a novel design modification of the CAT, aiming to prevent loose applications, by minimizing the slack. METHODS: Using the HapMed leg tourniquet trainer, an above the knee traumatic amputation was simulated. Active duty combatants and Special Forces basic medics were randomly assigned to apply the modified (n = 67) or conventional CAT (n = 65) once. Applied pressure, hemorrhage control status, time to stop the bleeding, and estimated blood volume loss were measured. RESULTS: Using the modified CAT, the mean (±SD) pressure applied was significantly higher compared to the conventional one (231.49 ± 37.84 mm Hg vs. 213.31 ± 45.51 mm Hg, p < 0.05). Hemorrhage control rate was 86.6% in the modified CAT group versus 67.7% in the conventional CAT group (p < 0.05). Analyzing only the applications that succeeded in hemorrhage control, blood loss (171.12 ± 72.43 mL vs.187.75 ± 91.72 mL, p > 0.05) and time to stop bleeding (27.27 ± 13.15 seconds vs. 27.5 ± 11.25 seconds, p > 0.05) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The modified CAT demonstrated an upgraded pressure profile and hemorrhage control rate, potentially indicating its improved efficacy.

Point of injury tourniquet application during Operation Protective Edge-What do we learn?

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield. Timely tourniquet application to massively bleeding extremity wounds is critical for casualty survival albeit with reported adverse effects to extremity integrity. The aim of this study was to describe the immediate- and short-term outcomes of point of injury (POI) tourniquet applications during "Operation Protective Edge" (OPE). METHODS: A case series study regarding tourniquet application at the POI during OPE was collected. The data gathered included reports by medical providers at the POI, aerial and land evacuation vehicles, and receiving hospitals. Variables collected included, the number of tourniquet applications, caregiver level, tourniquet type, limb characters, tourniquet effectiveness, in-hospital procedures, complications, and short-term limb outcome. RESULTS: During OPE, the Israeli Defense Forces Medical Corps treated 704 casualties. Of these, 90 casualties were treated with 119 tourniquets of which 79 survived. Penetrating trauma was the mechanism of injury in 97.8% (88 of 90) of the casualties. Injuries sustained from improvised explosive devices and shrapnel were related to the use of more than one tourniquet per casualty and per limb (p = 0.034). The success rate of the first tourniquet was reported to be 70% (84 of 119), regardless of caregiver level (p = 0.56), tourniquet type (p = 0.16), or limb characters (p = 0.48). Twenty-seven (25.7%) of 105 of the tourniquets were converted to direct pressure dressings enroute to receiving hospitals two of the conversions failed and thus a new tourniquet was applied. Fasciotomy was performed on eight casualties (a single limb in each). Vascular injury was presumed to be the indication for fasciotomy in three of these cases, in the other five limbs (6%, 5 of 85), no vascular involvement was discovered during surgery, and the fasciotomy is suspected as tourniquet related. 7%) 6 of 85) suffered from neurological sequela that could not be explained by their primary injury. Total complication rate was 11.7% (10 of 85) (one patient had both fasciotomy and neural complication without vascular injury). CONCLUSION: Tourniquet use on the battlefield is a simple method of eliminating preventable death, we believe that clinical practice guidelines should promote liberal use of tourniquets by trained combatants and medical personnel with abilities to convert to direct pressure hemorrhage control when possible since an unjustified tourniquet application risks low rates minor morbidity, whereas a justifiable tourniquet not applied may be lethal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III; Therapeutic study, level IV.