Immediate vs. multistage revascularization of non-infarct coronary artery(-ies) in patients with hemodynamically stable multivessel disease acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Untreated multivessel disease (MVD) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been linked to a higher risk of recurrent ischemia and death within one year . Current guidelines recommend percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for significant non-infarct artery (-ies) (non-IRA) stenosis in hemodynamically stable AMI patients with MVD, either during or after successful primary PCI, within 45-days. However, deciding the timing of revascularization for non-IRA in cases of MVD is uncertain. METHODS: This meta-analysis was performed based on PRISMA guidelines after registering in PROSPERO (CRD42023472652). Databases were searched for relevant articles published before 10 November 2023. Pertinent data from the included studies were extracted and analyzed using RevMan v5.4. RESULTS: Out of 640 studies evaluated, there were 13 RCTs with 5144 patients with AMI with MVD. The immediate non-IRA PCI is associated with a significantly lower occurrence of unplanned ischemia-driven PCI (OR 0.60; confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.83) and target-vessel revascularization (OR 0.72; CI 0.53-0.97) . Although there is a favorable trend for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), nonfatal AMI, cerebrovascular events, and major bleeding in the immediate non-culprit artery (-ies) PCI, those were statistically non-significant. Similarly, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stent thrombosis, and acute renal insufficiency did not show significant differences between two groups. CONCLUSION: Among hemodynamically stable patients with multivessel AMI, the immediate PCI strategy was superior to the multistage PCI strategy for the unplanned ischemia-driven PCI and target-vessel revascularization while odds are favorable in terms of MACCE, nonfatal AMI, cerebrovascular events, and major bleeding at longest follow-up.

Transcarotid versus trans-axillary/subclavian transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is the treatment of choice in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Transcarotid (TCa) or Trans-axillary/subclavian (TAx/Sc) are safer and less invasive non-femoral approaches, where transfemoral access is difficult or impossible to obtain. METHODS: This meta-analysis was performed based on PRISMA guidelines after registering in PROSPERO (CRD42023482842). This meta-analysis was performed to compare the safety of the transcarotid and trans-axillary/subclavian approach for TAVR including studies from inception to October 2023. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 6227 patients were included in the analysis (TCa: 2566; TAx/Sc: 3661). Transcarotid TAVR approach had a favorable trend for composite of stroke and all-cause mortality (OR 0.79, CI 0.60-1.04), all-cause mortality, stroke, major vascular complication, and new requirement of permanent pacemaker though those were statistically insignificant. On sub-analysis of the results of the studies based on the territory (USA vs French), composite outcome of all cause mortality, stroke and major bleeding (OR 0.54, CI 0.54-0.81), composite of stroke and all cause mortality (OR 0.64, CI 0.50-0.81), and stroke/TIA (OR 0.53, CI 0.39-0.73) showed lower odds of occurrence among patient managed with TCa approach in the American cohort. CONCLUSION: Overall, transcarotid approach had favorable though statistically insignificant odds for composite (stroke and all-cause mortality) and individual outcomes (stroke, all-cause mortality, etc.). There are significant variations in observed outcomes based on study's geographic location. Large prospective randomized clinical trials comparing the two approaches with representative samples are necessary to guide the clinicians in choosing among these approaches.

Differences in Stroke or Systemic Thromboembolism Readmission Risk After Hospitalization for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.

Background Although atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are different arrhythmias, they are assumed to confer the same risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolism (STE) despite a lack of available evidence. In this study, we investigated the difference in the risk of stroke or STE after AF and AFL hospitalizations. Methodology The National Readmission Database (NRD) 2018 was used to identify AF and AFL patients using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes and were followed until the end of the calendar year to identify stroke or STE readmissions. Survival estimates were calculated, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) and compare the risk of stroke or STE readmissions between AF and AFL groups. Results A total of 215,810 AF and 15,292 AFL patients were identified. AFL patients were more likely to be younger (66 vs. 70 years), male (68% vs. 47%), and had higher prevalence of obesity (25% vs. 22%), obstructive sleep apnea (14% vs. 12%), diabetes mellitus (31% vs. 26%), and alcohol use (6.9% vs. 5.5%) (all p < 0.01). After adjusting for potential patient and hospital-level characteristics, there was a statistically significant decrease in one-year stroke or STE readmission risk in AFL patients compared to AF patients (aHR 0.79 (0.66-0.95); p = 0.01). Conclusions AFL patients are commonly younger males with a higher burden of medical comorbidity. There is a decrease in the one-year risk of stroke or STE events in AFL patients compared to AF. The predictors of stroke and STE are similar in both AFL and AF groups. Further studies with longer follow-up and anticoagulation data are needed to verify the results.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulant in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on three outcomes. We assessed the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared the efficacy and safety of DOAC in obese patients and non-obese patients with AF. Finally, we updated the current knowledge of outcomes of AF patients with obesity compared with normal-weight patients regardless of anticoagulation type. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using PubMed and Embase, we searched for literature published from inception to August 2020 for studies conducted in morbidly obese patients with AF who used DOACs and/or VKA for stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) prevention that report efficacy and/or safety data. GRADE assessment was performed to determine the quality of the meta-analysis results. Direct oral anticoagulant was not statistically different from VKA in reducing stroke/SE with relative risk (RR) of 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-1.29; very low certainty evidence]. Major bleeding risk was lower in the DOAC groups with RR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.48-0.80; low certainty evidence). Obese patients with AF who used DOACs had lower risk of stroke/SE and similar major bleeding risk compared to non-obese patients with RR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84; low certainty evidence) and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.94-1.09; low certainty evidence), respectively. Obese patients with AF who used any type of anticoagulant had lower risk of stroke/SE compared to normal-weight patients with RR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57-0.69; low certainty evidence). CONCLUSION: The use of DOACs in morbidly obese patients may be reasonable if needed, and more dedicated studies are needed to make a more robust recommendation.

Cangrelor in STEMI as a bridge to CABG- a mini-case series.

Background: Patients with STEMI receive dual antiplatelet therapy as soon as possible with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist prior to PCI. A fraction of these patients may have multi-vessel disease needing emergent CABG surgery. The choice of a P2Y12 receptor antagonist plays a role in the timing of CABG surgery as it poses a bleeding risk until it is completely eliminated from the system. Oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists have a long duration of platelet inhibition which is difficult to reverse. Cangrelor is an intravenous P2Y12 receptor antagonist with a short half-life and rapid cessation of its effect after discontinuation. Methods: Three patients who presented to our emergency department with STEMI were started on cangrelor infusion prior to cardiac catheterization instead of other P2Y12 receptor antagonists like clopidogrel or ticagrelor. The study received ethical approval as it is part of the current standard of care for STEMI patients. Results: All three patients were found to have multi-vessel disease during coronary angiography requiring CABG surgery. As cangrelor was used in these patients they were able to have their surgery within 24-48 h. Intravenous cangrelor was stopped about an hour before surgery. No bleeding complications occurred and all three patients made a speedy recovery in the ICU. Conclusion: Cangrelor is a potent P2Y12 receptor antagonist which can be used in patients presenting with STEMI as one of the two anti-platelet agents along with aspirin without any dilemma that it would cause a delay in CABG surgery if the patients need one.

Neurohormonal Regulation of Appetite and its Relationship with Stress: A Mini Literature Review.

Stress has long been known to affect eating behaviors in humans. Stress-induced hyperphagia is considered a potential cause for the development of obesity. Given the high prevalence of obesity and its association with other cardiovascular and metabolic disorders, the subject of stress-induced eating has become even more important. We reviewed data from past studies to further elucidate the relationship between stress, appetite regulation and eating patterns in humans. Even though it is difficult to say with certainty that a person exposed to stress will undereat or overeat, but certain assumptions can be made. Generally, acute stress results in decreased eating whereas chronic stress results in increased eating. Glucocorticoids, the effector molecules of the stress response, increase the tendency to consume high-calorie, palatable foods. Further studies that can link the biological markers of stress-response with the hormones and neurotransmitters of appetite regulation can broaden our understanding of the subject. These studies can provide a groundwork for the development of effective anti-obesity strategies.