Understanding Nepali widows' experiences for the adaptation of an instrument to assess Prolonged Grief Disorder.

The experience of grief varies across different cultures and contexts. Women in Nepal who lose their husbands confront discrimination, social isolation, and abuse that influence their experience of grief. Through eight focus group discussions with Nepali widows, we elicited socially sanctioned grief reactions and local idioms used to describe common cognitive, behavioral, and emotional symptoms of grief. Accordingly, modifications to an existing instrument for Prolonged Grief Disorder, the PG-13, are suggested to capture grief symptoms as experienced by Nepali widows. Items in the PG-13 were translated to colloquial Nepali and adapted to maintain comprehensibility, acceptability, relevance, and completeness. Based on the grief-related issues reported in the focus group discussions, the addition of five new items and a new criterion to capture symptoms related to social discrimination are proposed. Widows perceived elevated symptoms one year after the loss to be problematic. It is thus recommended that the duration criterion in the original PG-13 be adjusted from at least six months to at least one year after the loss. These proposed modifications to the instrument should be validated through future psychometric testing.

Adaptation and psychometric validation of the Prolonged Grief Disorder scale among widows in central Nepal.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of grief vary by culture and societal reactions to death may be gender specific. We aimed to validate a Nepali language version of the Prolonged Grief-13 item scale (PG-13) among widows. METHODS: We tested two adapted versions of a Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) instrument with 204 Nepali-speaking widows: one was a Nepali translation of the original PG-13 items, while the other contained five additional items derived from qualitative research. We evaluated internal consistency, factor structure, and construct and criterion validity. RESULTS: Participants were on average 44 years old (SD=9.3), completed 6.7 years of school (SD=3.3) and had survived their husbands by 10 years (SD=8.1). Thirteen percent met global criteria for PGD. The removal of one original PG-13 item (felt emotionally numb) from both versions due to poor discriminant validity resulted in 12- and 17-item versions. Exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor structure for the PG-12 and PG-17. Both versions of the scale exhibited high internal consistency (0.89 and 0.93 respectively). Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that symptoms of PGD were distinct from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and depressive symptoms. The PG-12 had lower sensitivity (74.1%) but higher specificity (83.6%) compared to the PG-17 (81.5% and 73.5% respectively). LIMITATIONS: Psychosocial counselors' clinical interview global ratings were used as the standard for comparison in criterion validity analyses. Generalizability to other socio-cultural (e.g. non-widowed, low-caste) populations and men in Nepal cannot be assumed. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate satisfactory psychometric properties and validity of both versions of the PG instruments, supporting their use with Nepali speaking widows.