Clinical and laboratory features of patients with focal lymphocytic sialadenitis on minor salivary gland biopsy for sicca symptoms: A single-center experience.

ABSTRACT: Minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB) is often used in patients lacking specific autoantibodies (seronegative patients) to confirm the presence of focal lymphocytic sialadenitis (FLS), which would suggest a diagnosis of Sjogren syndrome. There are no current guidelines indicating when to refer patients for MSGB. The objective of our study was to ascertain distinguishing clinical and laboratory features among individuals with sicca symptoms based on their serologic and histopathologic status, and to identify factors associated with FLS.Using a cross-sectional study design, patients ages 18 years or older with sicca symptoms who had MSGB performed at the University of Iowa from January 2000 to December 2016 were selected for chart reviews. The clinical and laboratory features of patients with and without FLS were analyzed using exact univariate and multivariable logistic regression, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.We identified 177 patients who had MSGB performed and available clinical data. A total of 133 patients had FLS, 37 (27.8%) were seropositive (positive-anti-Sjogren syndrome type A [SSA] and/or anti-Sjogren syndrome type B) and 96 (72.2%) were seronegative. Dry eyes (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]: 5.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-26.30; adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 12.58, 95% CI: 1.70-167.77) and the presence of anti-SSA (OR: 7.16, 95% CI: 1.70-64.24; aOR: 8.82, 95% CI: 1.73-93.93) were associated with FLS. Smoking (aOR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11-0.63) and antihistamine use (aOR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.63) were associated with lower odds of FLS.Our study suggests that dry eyes and anti-SSA positivity are associated with FLS. Smoking and antihistamine use were associated with lower odds of FLS. In the appropriate clinical context, seronegative patients with sicca symptoms and no smoking history could be considered for MSGB. A thorough medication and smoking history should be performed in all patients before referral for MSGB.

Unexpected Death of a Child with Complex Febrile Seizures-Pathophysiology Similar to Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy?

Febrile seizures are usually considered relatively benign. Although some cases of sudden unexplained death in childhood have a history of febrile seizures, no documented case of febrile seizure-induced death has been reported. Here, we describe a child with complex febrile seizures who died suddenly and unexpectedly after a suspected seizure while in bed at night during the beginning phases of sleep. She was resuscitated and pronounced brain dead 2 days later at our regional medical center. Autopsy revealed multiorgan effects of hypoperfusion and did not reveal an underlying (precipitating) disease, injury, or toxicological cause of death. Although a seizure was not witnessed, it was suspected as the underlying cause of death based on the medical examiner and forensic pathologist (author Marcus Nashelsky) investigation, the post-resuscitation clinical findings, and multiple aspects of the clinical history. The child had a history of complex febrile seizures that had previously caused apnea and oxygen desaturation. She had two febrile seizures earlier on the same day of the fatal event. Interestingly, her mother also experienced a febrile seizure as a child, which led to respiratory arrest requiring cardiorespiratory resuscitation. This case suggests that in a child with complex febrile seizures, a seizure can induce death in a manner that is consistent with the majority of cases of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Further work is needed to better understand how and why certain individuals, with a history of epilepsy or not, die suddenly and unexpectedly from seizures. This will only occur through better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying epileptic and febrile seizures and death from seizures including SUDEP.