Comparative Effects on Fetal Hematopoiesis and Placental Inflammation From Mesenchymal and Hematopoietic Stem Cells as Agents of Transamniotic Stem Cell Therapy (TRASCET) in a Syngeneic Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction.

PURPOSE: We compared transamniotic stem cell therapy (TRASCET) using either mesenchymal (MSCs) or hematopoietic (HSCs) stem cells on fetal hematopoiesis in a syngeneic model of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). METHODS: Lewis dams exposed to cycling hypoxia (10.5% O2) in late gestation had their fetuses (n = 83) either receiving no intervention (untreated; n = 9), or intra-amniotic injections of either HSCs (HSC; n = 34), MSCs primed to an enhanced anti-inflammatory phenotype (primed-MSC; n = 28), or saline (sham; n = 12). Normal controls (n = 18) were also studied. Complete peripheral blood counts and placental ELISA for inflammation and angiogenesis markers were performed at term. RESULTS: Overall survival from hypoxia was 41% (34/83). Red blood count (RBC), hematocrit (Hct) and hemoglobin levels (Hb) were all significantly decreased from normal in all hypoxia groups. TRASCET with primed-MSC had significantly higher RBC, Hct, and Hb levels than sham (p = 0.01-0.03, pairwise), though not than untreated (which had no surgical blood loss). The HSC group had only significantly higher Hb levels than sham (p = 0.005). TRASCET with primed-MSC had significantly lower levels of placental TNF-α than sham (p = 0.04), but not untreated. CONCLUSIONS: MCSs seem more effective than HSCs in enhancing hematopoiesis when used as donor cells for TRASCET in a syngeneic model of IUGR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A (animal and laboratory study).

Mindfulness Based Interventions for Surgeons: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for surgeons. BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals have alarmingly high rates of burnout, yet little is known about psychological factors that support resilience. MBIs, which involve codified training in specific skills such as self-awareness, emotional regulation, and perspective-taking, have shown benefit to professionals in high stress environments, but have had limited implementation in the healthcare workplace and in surgery. To our knowledge, there has not been a scoping review of MBIs in surgery to date. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of the evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of MBIs for surgeons, including evidence on interventions that explicitly train mindfulness, which spans multiple cohorts and settings, utilizing different methodologies and outcome measures. RESULTS: This scoping review yielded 24 studies, including two mixed method/qualitative studies, nine randomized control trials, three non-randomized interventional studies, and eight single-arm interventional studies. CONCLUSIONS: We find that MBIs in surgery 1) are feasible in surgical contexts, with implementation science providing insights on sustainability; 2) increase mindfulness, 3) improve well-being in terms of burnout and both psychological and neurophysiological measures of stress, and 4) enhance performance as measured in executive function, surgical skills, and communication skills. These conclusions are supported by psychometric measures, observations of technical skills, and neurophysiological evidence. Future directions include studying MBIs in larger and more diverse populations, and iteratively tailoring mindfulness-based interventions to other healthcare contexts.