ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The Real-time Position Management™ (RPM) is used as a motion management tool to reduce normal tissue complication. However, no commercial software is available to quantify the "beam-on" errors in RPM-generated breathing traces. This study aimed to develop and validate an in-house-coded MATLAB program to quantify the "beam-on" errors in the breathing trace. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A graphical user interface (GUI) was developed using MATLAB (Matrix Laboratory Ra2016) software. The GUI was validated using two phantoms (Varian-gated phantom and Brainlab ET gating phantom) with three regular motion profiles. Treatment time delay was calculated using regular sinusoidal motion profile. Ten patient's irregular breathing profiles were also analyzed using this GUI. RESULTS: The beam-on comparison between the recorded reference trace and irradiated trace profile was done in two ways: (1) beam-on time error and (2) beam-on displacement error. These errors were ≤1.5% with no statistical difference for phase- and amplitude-based treatments. The predicated amplitude levels of reference phase-based profiles, and the actual amplitude levels of amplitude-based irradiated profiles were almost equal. The average treatment time delay was 47 ± 0.003 ms. The irregular breathing profile analysis showed that the amplitude-based gating treatment was more accurate than phase based. CONCLUSION: The developed GUI gave the same and acceptable results for all regular profiles. These errors were due to the lag time of the linear accelerator with gating treatment. This program can be used as to quantifying the intrafraction "beam-on" errors in breathing trace with both mode of gating techniques for irregular breathing trace, and in addition, it is capable to convert phase-based gating parameters to amplitude-based gating parameters for treatment.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study is to reduce the dose of heart, both lung and opposite breast and left anterior descending artery (LAD) and avoid long term complication and radiation induced secondary malignancies in radiotherapy left breast/chest wall without losing homogeneity and conformity of the Planning Target Volume (PTV), contoured using Radiotherapy Oncology Group (RTOG 1005) guideline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment plans were generated retrospectively by TFIF, VMAT and Composite techniques for 30 patients. Dose-Volume Histograms (DVHs) were evaluated for PTV and organs at risk (OAR's) and analyzed in two groups BCS and MRM using Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The homogeneity index (HI) was improved in Composite technique by 32.72% and 21.81% of VMAT, 50.66% and 49.41% of TFIF in BCS and MRM group respectively. The Conformity Index (CI) for composite plan was statistically same as VMAT and superior by 27.94% and 41.37% of TFIF in BCS and MRM group respectively. The low dose volume V5Gy and V10Gy of the heart were improved in Composite plan by 47.9% and 26.1% of VMAT respectively in BCS group and in MRM group, improved by 21.2% and 45.6% of VMAT. The V5Gy and V10Gy of ipsilateral lung were improved in Composite plan by 16% and 13.7% of VMAT respectively in BCS and 8.4% and 3% of VMAT respectively in MRM group. CONCLUSION: The Composite plan consisting of VMAT and TFIF plan with an optimum selection of fractions can achieve lower low dose exposure to the OAR's without compromising coverage compared to VMAT.
