Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 46
Filter
1.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 39(3): 179-83, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20203281

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were (1) to subjectively quantify the degree of scratching and smudging that had taken place in the junior clinic in the 9 months following the implementation of digital radiology; (2) to compare the findings with a previously published report; and (3) to identify areas in the protocol and training that can be refined to minimize future scratching and smudging. METHODS: Seven sets of blank clinical photostimulable storage phosphor (PSP) plates were scanned after exposing them at 65 kV and 7 mA for 0.80 s. Scanned plates were lightly wiped with a soft cloth and alcohol, repackaged in plastic sleeves, re-exposed and rescanned. The two sets of resulting images were subjectively rated independently by two investigators for artefacts and placed in five categories. RESULTS: Of all the images, approximately 75% were rated in the top 3 categories (most readable), leaving 17% and 8% in the poor and unsatisfactory categories, respectively. Mean rated values of the two image sets (before and after wiping) were not statistically different, but ratings slightly improved after cleaning the plates. CONCLUSIONS: Wiping all plates to remove surface contamination may not always be necessary or desirable. Systems that are designed to minimize handling of the plates may help minimize scratching of them.


Subject(s)
Radiography, Dental, Digital/instrumentation , X-Ray Intensifying Screens , Artifacts , Equipment Failure , Equipment Reuse , Humans , Schools, Dental , Surface Properties
2.
J Clin Periodontol ; 30(2): 125-31, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12622854

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to examine the influence of enamel matrix proteins (EMP) on the viability, proliferation, and attachment of periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) to diseased root surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary cell cultures of PDFL were obtained from clinically healthy third molars or premolar teeth. Viability and proliferation rates were carried out over a 10-day period. A total of 80,000 cells were plated in 24-well plates followed by EMEM with 10% FBS (positive control) and EMEM plus EMP at 25, 50, 75, and 100 micro g/ml. Cells were harvested on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 and viability was performed utilizing an MTS assay. PDLF proliferation rates were assessed by a CyQUANT GR dye assay. SEM analysis was used to examine the qualitative effects of cellular attachment to diseased root surfaces following EMP compared to nontreated controls. RESULTS: The results indicated that viability was negatively affected for higher doses over time while lower doses displayed viability effects similar to control. Proliferation, however, appeared to be ameliorated following exposure to EMP. The SEM analysis suggests that cellular attachment to diseased dentin was enhanced following EMP application. CONCLUSION: These in vitro studies support the concept that EMP may act as a suitable matrix for PDLF.


Subject(s)
Cell Adhesion/drug effects , Dental Enamel Proteins/pharmacology , Periodontal Ligament/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Cell Division/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Cells, Cultured , Dentin , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Humans , Male , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Periodontal Diseases , Periodontal Ligament/cytology , Regeneration/drug effects , Tooth Root
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11346726

ABSTRACT

The American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology developed these Parameters of Care to provide national guidelines for the use of radiographs prescribed for the diagnosis of disease, treatment planning, and follow-up care of patients with abnormalities of the oral and maxillofacial region. The Parameters cover radiographic techniques, imaging of the temporomandibular joint, imaging of diseases of the jaws, and imaging of dental implant sites.


Subject(s)
Radiography, Dental/standards , Radiography/standards , Dental Caries/diagnostic imaging , Dental Implants , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Jaw Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Patient Care Planning , Periodontal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Quality Control , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Radiology/education , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
J Periodontol ; 71(11): 1750-5, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11128924

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to compare 5 digital analytic protocols for their abilities to extract data from digital clinical radiographs and discriminate between patients with gingivitis and periodontitis. METHODS: Five digital-image analysis protocols were compared for their abilities to discriminate between two groups of 24 patients each. One group was diagnosed with healthy gingiva (or gingivitis) and the second with periodontitis. These groups were previously evaluated in published studies that used fractal and morphologic analyses. Pre-existing clinical radiographs for each patient were digitized and regions of interest (ROIs) were placed on interdental bone in mandibular posterior quadrants. The 5 protocols used were: 1) MGB: a median filtration to remove high-frequency noise, a Gaussian filtration to remove low-frequency noise, binarization of the resulting image, and quantification of the black pixels; 2) MGBS: the same protocol as MGB except for a skeletonization of the binary image and a quantification of the skeleton's pixels; 3) GBS: Gaussian filtration, binarization (thresholding on the mean pixel value) of the resulting image, skeletonization, and quantification of the pixels of the skeleton; 4) NS: normalization, skeletonization, and quantification of the skeleton's pixels; and 5) S: a variation of NS, except normalization was not used. The resulting values for the 2 patient groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests and effect likelihood-ratio test. RESULTS: For digitized radiographs, the mean gray-scale value (+/- standard deviation) for gingivitis patients was 183.22 +/- 18.53 and for periodontitis patients 181.26 +/- 17.20. Mann-Whitney U tests resulted in the following P values for these protocols: MGBS <0.01; S <0.01; GBS <0.01; NS <0.01; and MGB <0.83. Effect likelihood-ratio tests indicated that only MGBS and S significantly contributed to models containing the other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Small variations to protocols affected the strength of the discrimination between the gingivitis and periodontitis groups. While there is potential for morphologic analysis to be used to discriminate between patients with gingivitis and periodontitis, a robust technique was not identified.


Subject(s)
Gingivitis/diagnostic imaging , Periodontitis/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiography, Dental/methods , Adult , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Artifacts , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Filtration/instrumentation , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Male , Statistics, Nonparametric
5.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 118(1): 34-42, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10893471

ABSTRACT

Ideal orthodontic treatment should achieve long-term stability of the occlusion. The mandibular incisor segment has been described as the segment that is most likely to exhibit relapse after treatment and retention. Therefore, relapse of this is a challenge that clinicians need to address. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the amount of relapse that may occur in Angle Class II Division 1 patients, treated orthodontically with tandem mechanics. All cases in this study were treated without extraction of permanent teeth, and the patients were followed for at least 2 years after the end of the retention phase of treatment. Six predictors were investigated at pretreatment, posttreatment, and postretention periods. A synopsis of this study shows the correction of lower incisor crowding as measured by the irregularity index was stable over 5.2 years of postretention follow-up; but longer follow-up time revealed increased relapse of incisor irregularity. Intermolar width increased during treatment and remained stable in the follow-up period. Overjet and overbite corrections and changes in the lower incisor to mandibular plane angle were also stable in the follow-up period. In addition, the amounts of overjet correction and loss of expansion of intercanine distance after treatment were associated with increased irregularity index in the follow-up period. It appears the discrepancies between this and previously published works are sufficiently dramatic that the whole question of treatment philosophy and long-term stability may need to be reevaluated.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II/pathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Cephalometry , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/physiopathology , Recurrence , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Periodontol ; 71(5): 683-9, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10872947

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to test the association between cemento-enamel junction, alveolar-crest distance (CEJ-AC, as measured on digitized vertical bite-wing radiographs) and postcranial bone mineral density (BMD) relative to clinical, dietary, and demographic variables. METHODS: Data were collected in a cross-sectional study of 134 postmenopausal women. CEJ-AC distances were determined from digitized vertical bite-wing radiographs. Lumbar spine and proximal femur BMDs were determined from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometric scans. Correlation analysis and Student t tests were used to identify those variables most associated with CEJ-AC distance. The selected variables were modeled with a backward stepwise regression analysis, with CEJ-AC distance as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Parity (number of pregnancies to term), cigarette smoking, and the interaction of lateral spine BMD with cigarette smoking were independent predictors of CEJ-AC distance (P < or =0.05). Statistical models containing these variables accounted for 19% of the variation in CEJ-AC distances. CONCLUSIONS: CEJ-AC distance in postmenopausal women is the result of a complicated interaction of many effects, including but not limited to, parity, cigarette smoking, and skeletal BMD.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss/etiology , Alveolar Bone Loss/physiopathology , Parity/physiology , Postmenopause/physiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Absorptiometry, Photon , Age Factors , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Bone Density/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diet , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Least-Squares Analysis , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Middle Aged , Ovariectomy , Radiography, Bitewing , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Tooth Cervix/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Cervix/physiology
7.
J Periodontol ; 71(3): 335-40, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10776919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We set out to determine whether morphologic measurements extracted from digitized images of bite-wing radiographs correlated with lumbar and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in 45 postmenopausal women who had no or only mild periodontal disease (no probing depths >5 mm). METHODS: Lumbar spine and femoral BMDs were determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Vertical bite-wing radiographs were taken and digitized. Crestal and apical regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the digital images of the maxillary and mandibular alveolar bone on the patient's right and left sides. For each patient, a single morphologic measurement was made for each of 8 ROIs. Correlation analysis was performed to determine the strengths of the relationships between the morphologic measurements made at the 8 locations and between these morphologic measurements and BMD measurements. RESULTS: The correlations (r) between the morphologic operator (MO) measurements and lumbar spine and femoral BMDs were weak (mean r = 0.02, range = 0.32 to -0.26) and not statistically significant, with no clear trends discernible. Correlations between MO measurements made at the 8 alveolar sites were also weak (mean r = 0.05, range = 0.35 to -0.38) and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The MO measurements used in this study were weakly correlated with lumbar spine and femoral BMDs, with no clear trends discernible in this population of postmenopausal women with no or mild periodontal disease.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Bone Density , Femur/anatomy & histology , Lumbar Vertebrae/anatomy & histology , Postmenopause , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Absorptiometry, Photon , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Periodontal Pocket/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Bitewing , Statistics as Topic
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10556762

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlations among morphologic operations (MO) values and the correlations among gray-level values for regions of interest (ROIs) placed at various locations on digital images of alveolar bone for 45 patients. STUDY DESIGN: As part of a larger study, up to 7 vertical bite-wing radiographs were taken and digitized for each of 45 patients. Sets of 2 rectangular ROIs were placed on the digitized images of interdental alveolar bone at 4 locations for each patient. The ROIs (1 crestal and 1 apical) were placed between second premolars and first molars in all 4 dental quadrants. Gray-level values were measured, and MO analysis was performed on each ROI. Descriptive statistics were calculated and correlations determined. RESULTS: Paired correlations (such as apical vs crestal, left vs right, maxillary apical vs mandibular apical) of MO values were weak (r = 0.01-0.21), but corresponding correlations for gray-level values were relatively strong (r = 0. 60-0.92). CONCLUSION: MO values varied with ROI location considerably more than did gray-level values. Additionally, ROI size and shape apparently affected MO data. Accurate placement and documentation of ROIs appear to be critical considerations in analyses that use MOs.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/pathology , Radiography, Bitewing/methods , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methods , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Process/pathology , Humans , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Statistics, Nonparametric
10.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 116(1): 101-7, 1999 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10393587

ABSTRACT

The correction and relapse of mandibular anterior crowding was evaluated in a population of 58 patients with Angle Class I malocclusion who were treated orthodontically without extraction of permanent teeth. The subjects were retrospectively evaluated from records taken before treatment, posttreatment, and postretention. The postretention period averaged 8 years (minimum of 4 and maximum of 20 years). All cases in Groups A and B were given orthopedic treatment to develop the maxillary apical base in the transverse and anteroposterior planes. Group A was treated with expansion of the inner bow of the face bow appliance (Kloehn), and Group B was treated with the Haas palatal expansion appliance. Both groups were then treated orthodontically with tandem mechanics. The response variables measured were: overbite, overjet, intercanine distance, intermolar distance, and irregularity index. Study groups A and B were not significantly different for subject age, retention, or postretention time. Moreover, the groups did not show significant difference for any of the response variables before treatment. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the treatment times (P =.0133). A statistically significant treatment effect was observed for most response variables in the groups. Overbite, overjet, and irregularity index were significantly reduced, intermolar distance was significantly increased, and intercanine distance showed no significant change in Groups A and B. In the postretention period, there was a tendency for variables to change slightly toward their before treatment values but no compromise of orthodontic correction was noted. The irregularity index in Group A was corrected from 4.8 to 1.1 mm and remained at 1.1 mm in the postretention period. The irregularity index in Group B was corrected from 5.1 to 1.2 mm (P =.0001) and changed slightly from 1. 2 to 1.7 mm (P =.0540) in the postretention period. We concluded that mandibular incisors tended to become more crowded postretention. However, in contrast to previous reports, we calculate this relapse to be small. Neither before treatment nor posttreatment variables were predictive of relapse.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Palatal Expansion Technique , Adolescent , Cuspid/pathology , Dental Arch/pathology , Extraoral Traction Appliances , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/pathology , Mandible/pathology , Maxilla/pathology , Molar/pathology , Orthodontic Retainers , Orthodontics, Corrective , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Tooth Movement Techniques , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Clin Periodontol ; 25(11 Pt 1): 850-6, 1998 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9846792

ABSTRACT

Observer reliability in performing linear measurements between the cementoenamel junction and alveolar crest was determined for mandibular posterior teeth from digitized clinical bitewing radiographs acquired during recall examinations. 6 measurements (corresponding to traditional probing measurements) were made per tooth by 3 observers. Mesial and distal measurements made to the most coronal aspects of the alveolar crest were the most reliable and least biased. As was anticipated, intra-observer reliability was better than inter-observer reliability although the 3 observers of our study were able to detect a significant mean change (0.1 mm, p<0.0001) in alveolar bone height over a 1-year period for 10 patients. For our most reliable and unbiased measurements (mesial measurements to the alveolar crest), a change of 0.54 mm (90th percentile) would be required to indicate change at a site from one time to the next. Based on the reliability of our digital radiographic measurements, with the alpha error rate set at 0.05 and beta at 0.20, a difference in alveolar bone height of 0.3 mm could be detected with a patient sample size of between 13 (best case) and 54 (worst case).


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Bitewing , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Tooth/diagnostic imaging , Analysis of Variance , Confidence Intervals , Humans , Observer Variation , Radiography, Bitewing/methods , Radiography, Bitewing/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methods , Radiography, Dental, Digital/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results
12.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 27(4): 245-50, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9780904

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability of radiodensity measurements made from dental radiographs with manual and a novel computer-intensive methods. METHODS: As part of a prospective study of postmenopausal women, a series of seven vertical bitewing radiographs were taken of 36 patients. One of each set of radiographs was repeated. The original and the corresponding duplicate radiographs were used in this study. Radiographs were digitized at 50 microns spatial resolution and 12-bit gray-scale resolution. For the Manual Method, original and duplicate radiographs were manually cropped to improve image homology, histogram matched and mean pixel gray-scale values determined for an alveolar bone ROI within each image. For the computer-intensive method, images were put into registration with ANALYZE software (Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MINN, USA), cropped automatically, histogram matched and color-coded on the basis of the per cent difference. Alveolar bone ROIs adjacent to clinical crowns and root surfaces whose color code indicated less than a 5% change were sampled. Method error (ME) and the coefficient of variation of method error (CVME) were calculated. RESULTS: With the Manual Method the SD between original and duplicate measures was 95.21 out of 4096 gray scale values; ME = 67.32; CVME = 3.78%. For the computer-intensive method, the corresponding values were 54.74, 38.71, and 2.29%. CONCLUSIONS: The new computer-intensive method resulted in a 40% improvement over the Manual Method in the precision of radiodensity measurements.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Software
13.
J Periodontol ; 69(1): 9-13, 1998 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9527567

ABSTRACT

This study was undertaken to demonstrate that the fractal dimensions calculated using digitized non-standardized, clinical radiographs of mandibular alveolar bone from a population of patients diagnosed with periodontitis are statistically different from fractal dimensions calculated from another population diagnosed as having gingivitis or healthy gingiva. The fractal dimension was calculated using a public domain fractal analysis program distributed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Fractal dimensions were calculated from digitized clinical radiographs for 29 patients diagnosed with healthy gingiva and/or gingivitis and 32 patients diagnosed with periodontitis and compared. To estimate the reproducibility of the technique, we recalculated the fractal dimension from images of the gingivitis patients 3 months after the original calculations and compared them to the originals. A 2 sample, 2-tailed Student t test showed the gingivitis data group to be different from the periodontitis data group (P = 0.0012). The original gingivitis and repeat gingivitis groups fractal dimension calculation were the same and analysis showed the two data sets were not significantly different (P = 0.99). We found that: 1) fractal dimensions could be used to distinguish between gingivitis and periodontitis patient groups; 2) fractal dimensions could be calculated from non-standardized clinical radiographs; and 3) fractal dimensions for gingivitis patients were reproducible over a 3-month period.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Fractals , Gingiva/diagnostic imaging , Gingivitis/diagnostic imaging , Periodontitis/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Male , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Periodontal Pocket/diagnostic imaging , Public Sector , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Reproducibility of Results , United States
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9540094

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine whether morphologic operation procedures applied to digitized, non-standardized, clinical radiographs of mandibular alveolar bone could be used to distinguish between a population of patients diagnosed with periodontitis and a population of patients either diagnosed with gingivitis or having healthy gingivae. STUDY DESIGN: Two groups, one consisting of 29 patients who either had healthy gingivae or had been diagnosed with gingivitis and the other consisting of 32 patients who had been diagnosed with periodontitis, were compared. Pre-existing clinical radiographs were digitized, and for each patient three to six regions of interest were placed on an image of the mandibular posterior region of the interdental bone. The regions of interest were processed under two morphologic-operations protocols, and a mean density (referred to as an MO number) was calculated for each patient. With paired t-tests, the resulting MO numbers for the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The two populations were statistically different (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that morphologic operations have the potential to differentiate between patient groups differing in periodontal health.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Gingiva/diagnostic imaging , Gingivitis/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Periodontitis/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Enhancement
15.
J Periodontal Res ; 32(7): 619-25, 1997 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9401935

ABSTRACT

To determine whether postmenopausal bone loss and factors associated with osteoporosis affect tooth retention, we examined vertebral and proximal femoral (postcranial) bone mineral density in relation to tooth loss and attachment loss in a cross-sectional study of 135 postmenopausal women (age range 41-70 yr). Women had at least 10 teeth and no evidence of moderate or severe periodontal disease. Full-mouth attachment loss measurements were made using a pressure-sensitive probe, and bone density was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Attachment loss was correlated with tooth loss (number of remaining teeth, radiologically determined), but not with vertebral or proximal femur bone density. Multivariate analysis showed current smoking (p = 0.01), years since menopause (p = 0.02) and the interaction of age and current smoking (p < 0.01), to be statistically significant predictors of attachment loss in our study population.


Subject(s)
Periodontal Attachment Loss/etiology , Postmenopause , Smoking/adverse effects , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Body Mass Index , Bone Density , Cross-Sectional Studies , Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Female , Femur/pathology , Forecasting , Humans , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/pathology , Periodontal Attachment Loss/diagnostic imaging , Postmenopause/drug effects , Prospective Studies , Reproductive History , Spinal Diseases/pathology , Time Factors , Tooth Loss/etiology
16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9347511

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce cross-sectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. STUDY DESIGN: Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. CONCLUSIONS: Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.


Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Implants , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Panoramic , Tomography, X-Ray , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Process/pathology , Cadaver , Cephalometry , Humans , Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/diagnostic imaging , Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/pathology , Mandible/pathology , Radiographic Magnification , Vertical Dimension
17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9247959

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We used digitized dental radiographs of alveolar bone to test the hypothesis that the fractal dimension, as calculated with the program "ImageFractal" was independent of variations in X-ray exposure, beam alignment, and region of interest placement. STUDY DESIGN: The radiographic data set consisted of 72 radiographs digitized with 200 microns pixels. Radiographs were obtained with the use of three time settings and two alignments. Rectangular regions of interest were placed on each digital image over the interdental bone between the mandibular first and second molars on six hemimandibles. Each of six hemimandibles had identical copies of a unique region of interest placed on every image in its series. New regions were made 3 months later. A fractal dimension was computed from each region of interest with the caliper method included in ImageFractal, a public domain program available through National Institutes of Health. The resulting fractal dimensions were evaluated with two repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the fractal dimensions calculated for baseline images and those from overexposed and underexposed images, from images with 4 to 6 degrees of alignment variations, or from repeat regions of interest. CONCLUSION: The results support the hypothesis that fractal dimensions derived from digitized dental radiographs are not affected by variations in exposure or small variations in alignment and imply an absolute region of interest placement may not be necessary. However, caution should be used with the use of the fractal dimension to discriminate among alveolar bone variations until further research is performed.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Fractals , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Radiography, Dental/methods , Absorptiometry, Photon , Analysis of Variance , Artifacts , Humans , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Radiographic Magnification/statistics & numerical data , Software , X-Ray Film
18.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 26(5): 295-8, 1997 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9482002

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of using regions of interest (ROIs) of different size and shape on the fractal index of alveolar bone. STUDY DESIGN: Two sets of clinical posterior bitewing radiographs were used to calculate the fractal index (S). Two comparisons were made. First, S was calculated from large interdental ROIs that included small amounts of root structure and compared with S from small ROIs that included no root structures. Then S was calculated from large interdental ROIs (similar to those used for the first set) and compared with S calculated from ROIs that included nearly all of the mandibular alveolar bone (and adjacent root) present on the bitewing. RESULTS: For the first comparison, paired t-tests showed that fractal indices calculated with the large ROIs were significantly different from the respective indices calculated from the small ROIs (P < 0.001). For the second comparison, the fractal indices calculated from the large quadrant ROIs were not significantly different from those calculated from the large ROIs (P = 0.120). CONCLUSION: ROI size and shape may affect the results of fractal analysis of alveolar bone.


Subject(s)
Fractals , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methods , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiography, Bitewing/methods
19.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 127(4): 469-73, 1996 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8655867

ABSTRACT

Unlike traditional radiographs, digital images are electronically alterable and offer the potential for enhancing diagnostic information. The authors conducted a small-scale study to examine differences in clinicians' diagnoses of caries using traditional radiographs and digitized images vs. microscopic diagnosis. Two general dentists and one oral-maxillofacial radiologist scored the images for caries. This study suggests that digital enhancements may aid some clinicians in caries diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Dental Caries/pathology , Dental Enamel/diagnostic imaging , Dental Enamel/pathology , Dentin/diagnostic imaging , Dentin/pathology , General Practice, Dental , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiology
20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8665323

ABSTRACT

This pilot study was undertaken to determine whether spatial resolution affects radiometric analyses aimed at detecting progressive enamel loss. Four teeth were weighed, attached to a positioning device, and evaluated with radiography. A 1 mm strip of enamel was removed from each tooth, and the teeth were weighted again and reexamined by radiography. This process was repeated five times until 1/2 mm of dentin was removed. The radiographs were digitized twice with 59 and 200 microns pixels at 8 bits, providing two series of images with the optical densities converted into 256 gray levels. Each series of images was adjusted for contrast variation. Regions of interest were drawn on the crowns, and cumulative percent histograms (CPHs) were calculated. Within a series of CPHs enamel reduction resulted in shifts in the CPHs that were directly proportional to the amount of enamel removed. CPH shifts associated with the smaller 59 microns pixels accounted for 68% of the variation in weights caused by enamel reduction, whereas the shifts associated with the larger 200 microns pixels accounted for 50%. The results indicate that pixel size does affect radiometric determinations of enamel reduction.


Subject(s)
Dental Enamel/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Radiometry , Dental Caries/diagnostic imaging , Dental Caries/pathology , Dental Enamel/pathology , Dentin/diagnostic imaging , Dentin/pathology , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Organ Size , Pilot Projects , Tooth Abrasion/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Abrasion/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...