Cost evaluation of continuation of therapy with dalbavancin compared to standard-of-care antibiotics alone in hospitalized persons who inject drugs with severe gram-positive infections.

PURPOSE: Persons who inject drugs (PWID) are at risk for severe gram-positive infections and may require prolonged hospitalization and intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Dalbavancin (DBV) is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide that may reduce costs and provide effective treatment in this population. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of PWID with severe gram-positive infections. Patients admitted from January 1, 2017, to November 1, 2019 (standard-of-care [SOC] group) and from November 15, 2019, to March 31, 2022 (DBV group) were included. The primary outcome was the total cost to the healthcare system. Secondary outcomes included hospital days saved and treatment failure. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included (37 in the DBV group and 50 in the SOC group). Patients were a median of 34 years old and were predominantly Caucasian (82%). Staphylococcus aureus (82%) was the most common organism, and bacteremia (71%) was the most common type of infection. Compared to the SOC group, the DBV group would have had a median of 14 additional days of hospitalization if they had stayed to complete their therapy (P = 0.014). The median total cost to the healthcare system was significantly lower in the DBV group than in the SOC group ($31,698.00 vs $45,093.50; P = 0.035). The rate of treatment failure was similar between the groups (32.4% in the DBV group vs 36% in the SOC group; P = 0.729). CONCLUSION: DBV is a cost-saving alternative to SOC IV antibiotics for severe gram-positive infections in PWID, with similar treatment outcomes. Larger prospective studies, including other patient populations, may demonstrate additional benefit.

Infectious Diseases Consultation Associated With Reduced Mortality in Gram-Negative Bacteremia.

Gram-negative bacteremia (GN-BSI) can cause significant morbidity and mortality, but the benefit of infectious diseases consultation (IDC) is not well defined. A 24-site observational cohort study of unique hospitalized patients with 4861 GN-BSI episodes demonstrated a 40% decreased risk of 30-day mortality in patients with IDC compared to those without IDC.

Epidemiology of Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections in the United States: Results From a Cohort of 24 Hospitals.

Background: To address knowledge gaps in management of Gram-negative bloodstream infection, the Antibiotic Stewardship Implementation Collaborative was established consisting of programs from 24 academic and community hospitals across the United States. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of unique adult patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection hospitalized at participating hospitals from January to December 2019. Patient level and microbiologic data were collected via electronic medical record review with a standardized data collection form and data dictionary. Data analysis was largely descriptive. The Pearson χ2 test to compare categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables were used. Results: In total, 4851 bacterial isolates from 3710 eligible unique patients were included in the cohort. Most common source of infection was the urinary tract (47.9%). Source control was achieved in 84% of cases. Escherichia coli (2471, 51.0%) was the most common Gram-negative organism recovered. Antibiogram combining isolates from all participating centers with species-level susceptibilities and source specific antibiograms for isolates from urinary, respiratory, and intraabdominal source were created. Northeast sites contributed the most extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing organisms (73%), but West sites had the highest percentage of ESBL producers of total isolates (16%). A statistically significant difference in percentage of ESBL-producing organisms in Whites vs. non-Whites (14.6 % and 9.5 %, respectively, P<0.01) was observed. Conclusions: While the present study was conducted pre-pandemic, it highlights the need for stewardship data collaboratives to enhance our understanding of the antimicrobial resistance patterns.

Antibiotic Use and Associated Risk Factors for Antibiotic Prescribing in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Literature suggests that antibiotic prescribing in COVID-19 patients is high. Currently, there are insufficient data on what drives antibiotic prescribing practices throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine antibiotic use rates and identify risk factors for antibiotic prescribing in hospitalized patients. It was the first study to assess risk factors for receiving more than 1 course of antibiotics. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multi-center, observational study. Patients admitted from March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020, and treated for COVID-19 were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of antibiotic use during hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included risk factors associated with antibiotic use, risk factors associated with receiving more than 1 antibiotic course, and rate of microbiologically confirmed infections. RESULTS: A total of 208 encounters (198 patients) were included in the final analysis. Eighty-three percent of patients received at least 1 course of antibiotics, despite low rates of microbiologically confirmed infection (12%). Almost one-third of patients (30%) received more than 1 course of antibiotics. Risk factors identified for both antibiotic prescribing and receiving more than 1 course of antibiotics included increased hospital length of stay (median 12 days), intensive care unit admission, and the necessity for mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: There were high rates of antibiotic prescribing with low rates of microbiologically confirmed bacterial co-infection. Many patients received more than 1 course of antibiotics during hospitalization. This study highlights the importance and demand for appropriate antibiotic stewardship practices in COVID-19 patients.

Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Strategies in Patients With Non-Carbapenemase-producing Carbapenem-Resistant Versus Carbapenem-Susceptible Enterobacterales Infections.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are difficult to treat and can cause significant morbidity and mortality, however most data reflect carbapenemase-producing infections. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate clinical outcomes of non-carbapenemase-producing CRE (nCP-CRE) compared with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE) infections. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020). The primary outcome was clinical success at 30 days with secondary outcomes, including clinical success at 90 days, clinical success based on treatment for nCP-CRE, persistent bacteremia, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of stay, and rate of Clostridioides difficile or multidrug resistant infections. RESULTS: The final analysis included 211 patients: 142 (67%) with CSE and 69 (33%) with nCP-CRE infections. Prior carbapenem exposure was more common with nCP-CRE (15% vs 4%, P = 0.01). Clinical success at 30 days was similar between groups (77% vs 74%, P = 0.73). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. There was an overall low use of carbapenems (empiric 6%, definitive 7%). Most nCP-CRE infections were treated with a monotherapy carbapenem-sparing regimen (empiric 88%, definitive 90%). Limitations include the retrospective design and the high rate of urinary infections. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Our study found no difference in clinical outcomes between nCP-CRE and CSE infections. Application of this study with future studies would help in determining optimal regimens for these infections.

Rate of broad-spectrum antibiotic overuse in patients receiving outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT).

Broad-spectrum antibiotics with once-daily dosing are often chosen for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) due to convenience even when narrower-spectrum antibiotics are appropriate. At our institution, up to 50% of select broad-spectrum OPAT regimens had potential to be narrowed, highlighting the need to re-evaluate regimens for de-escalation prior to discharge.

Impact of Case-Specific Education and Face-to-Face Feedback to Prescribers and Nurses in the Management of Hospitalized Patients With a Positive Clostridium difficile Test.

BACKGROUND: Approaches to changing providers' behavior around Clostridium difficile (CD) management are needed. We hypothesized that case-specific teaching points and face-to-face discussions with prescribers and nurses would improve management of patients with a positive CD test. METHODS: Charts of patients age ≥18 years with positive CD tests hospitalized July 2016 to May 2017 were prospectively reviewed to assess CD practices and generate management recommendations. The study had 4 periods: baseline (pre-intervention), intervention #1, observation, and intervention #2. Both interventions consisted of an in-person, real-time, case-based discussion and education by a CD Action Team (CDAT). Assessment occurred within 24 hours of a positive CD test for all periods; during the intervention periods, management was also assessed within 48 hours after CDAT-delivered recommendations. Outcomes included proportion of patients receiving optimized treatment and incidence rate ratios of practice changes (both CDAT-prompted and CDAT-independent). RESULTS: Overall, the CDAT made recommendations to 84 of 96 CD cases during intervention periods, and providers accepted 43% of CDAT recommendations. The implementation of the CDAT led to significant improvement in bowel movement (BM) documentation, use of proton pump inhibitors, and antibiotic selection for non-CD infections. Selection of CD-specific therapy improved only in the first intervention period. Laxative use and treatment of CD colonization cases remained unchanged. Only BM documentation, a nurse-driven task, was sustained independent of CDAT prompting. CONCLUSIONS: A behavioral approach to changing the management of positive CD tests led to self-sustained practice changes among nurses but not physicians. Better understanding of prescribers' decision-making is needed to devise enduring interventions.

Sustained impact of a rapid microarray-based assay with antimicrobial stewardship interventions on optimizing therapy in patients with Gram-positive bacteraemia.

OBJECTIVES: To compare antibiotic optimization and outcomes of patients before implementation of the Verigene Gram-Positive Blood Culture (Verigene BC-GP) nucleic acid microarray assay to after implementation with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) interventions and after discontinuation of AS interventions. METHODS: A retrospective pre-post-post quasi-experimental study was conducted to compare the three periods. AS interventions consisted of real-time guidance to clinicians on antibiotic selection. The primary outcome was median time from Gram stain to optimal therapy. Secondary outcomes included median time to effective therapy, median duration of therapy for contaminant organisms, median length of stay after blood cultures were collected, and all-cause in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Out of a total of 923 patients, 390 (125 baseline, 134 intervention, 131 post-intervention) who were not on optimal therapy at the time of Gram stain or had contaminated blood cultures were assessed. Compared with baseline, only the median time to optimal therapy for MSSA bacteraemia was reduced in both the intervention and post-intervention periods (17 versus 17 versus 50 h; P < 0.001), respectively. In an analysis adjusted for baseline differences among the groups using quantile regression models, use of the Verigene BC-GP assay in both periods significantly reduced time to optimal therapy by 14-22 h in patients who would achieve optimal therapy at ≥ 26 h without the assay. There were no differences in in-hospital mortality or hospital length of stay between study periods. CONCLUSIONS: A real-time AS intervention implemented alongside introduction of the Verigene BC-GP assay led to improvements in antibiotic therapy for patients with bacteraemia due to Gram-positive cocci, even after the AS intervention was discontinued.

Evaluation of BBL CHROMagar VanRE for detection of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci in rectal swab specimens.

A study was performed on 517 surveillance rectal swabs to evaluate a selective and differential chromogenic medium, the BBL CHROMagar VanRE (CVRE), which enables recovery and identification of VanA- and VanB-containing Enterococcus faecium (ENFM) and Enterococcus faecalis (ENFS) isolates. Compared to BBL Enterococcosel agar, a bile-esculin-azide-vancomycin (BEAV) agar, the initial overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CVRE for the detection of vancomycin-resistant ENFM and ENFS were 99.1% and 94.8% and 84.2% and 99.7%, respectively. Among our patient population, more vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were recovered with CVRE than BEAV.