Influence of chronic hepatitis C infection on cytochrome P450 3A4 activity using midazolam as an in vivo probe substrate.

PURPOSE: Inflammation-related changes in pharmacokinetics have been described for a number of disease-states including cancer, infection, and autoimmune disorders. This study examined the impact of chronic hepatitis C infection (CHC) on the pharmacokinetics of the cytochrome P450 3A probe midazolam in patients without significant liver disease who were either treatment naïve or prior interferon null-responders. METHODS: Data were pooled from three studies which compared the pharmacokinetics of oral midazolam in healthy volunteers (n = 107) and in treatment-naive patients (n = 35) and interferon-null responders (n = 24) with CHC but without significant liver disease. Oral midazolam was administered as a single 2 mg oral dose, followed by frequent pharmacokinetic sampling and determination of the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and its α-hydroxy metabolite. CYP3A activity was determined by the metabolic ratio (MR) of the AUC metabolite/AUC parent and compared across groups as the mean effect ratio (test/reference). RESULTS: The midazolam MR was lower in treatment-naïve patients with CHC than in health volunteers with a mean effect ratio of 0.63 [90 % confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.72]. The effect was more pronounced in null-responders, who demonstrated a mean MR effect ratio of 0.46 (90 % CI 0.39-0.53) compared to volunteers. The mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUCinf) for midazolam in healthy volunteers, naïve patients, and null-responders was 32.3 [coefficient of variation (CV%) 41], 36.5 (CV% 33.5), and 55.3 (CV% 36.9) ng.h/mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate a reduction in CYP3A4 activity between healthy volunteers and patients with CHC, with interferon null-responders demonstrating the most substantial difference. These results may have implications for the pharmacotherapy of patients infected with CHC.

Characterization of hepatitis C virus (HCV) quasispecies dynamics upon short-term dual therapy with the HCV NS5B nucleoside polymerase inhibitor mericitabine and the NS3/4 protease inhibitor danoprevir.

In the INFORM-1 study, 73 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection received mericitabine plus danoprevir for up to 13 days. Seventy-two patients experienced a continuous decline in HCV RNA levels during treatment, and of these patients, 14 had viral loads that remained >1,000 IU/ml by day 13 and 1 met the definition for viral breakthrough. In-depth NS5B and NS3/4A population and clonal sequencing studies and mericitabine and danoprevir drug susceptibility testing were performed to assess the variability and quasispecies dynamics before and upon monotherapy or dual therapy. Sequence analysis of the viral quasispecies indicated that the mericitabine resistance mutation S282T was not present at baseline, nor was it selected (even at a low level) during treatment. Protease inhibitor resistance mutations, either as predominant or as minority species, were detected in 18 patients at baseline. No enrichment of minority protease inhibitor-resistant variants present at baseline was observed during treatment; viral population samples were fully susceptible to mericitabine and/or danoprevir, despite the presence within their quasispecies of minority variants confirmed to have reduced susceptibility to danoprevir or other protease inhibitors. It was also observed that certain NS3 amino acid substitutions affected protease inhibitor drug susceptibility in a compound-specific manner and varied with the genetic context. In summary, the slower kinetics of viral load decline observed in some patients was not due to the selection of danoprevir or mericitabine resistance during treatment. Over 2 weeks' therapy, mericitabine suppressed the selection of danoprevir resistance, results that could differ upon longer treatment periods.

Genotypic correlates of a virologic response to stavudine after zidovudine monotherapy.

Prior evidence suggests that resistance to zidovudine (ZDV) confers some degree of cross-resistance to stavudine (d4T), but no genotypic correlates of clinical d4T susceptibility and resistance exist. To identify the genotypic correlates of a virologic response to d4T, reverse transcriptase (RT) sequencing of archived plasma HIV isolates was performed on 31 subjects who received d4T monotherapy in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 302 study, all of whom received more than 3 years of ZDV monotherapy. Baseline characteristics and all RT mutations were analyzed for impact on virologic suppression. Eight of 31 subjects (27%) achieved a virologic response of greater than 0.3 log reduction in plasma HIV RNA after 8 weeks of d4T. Responders were more likely to have lower median baseline viral loads (4.2 vs. 4.7; p =.01) and a trend toward fewer ZDV-associated mutations (median: 1 vs. 2; p =.09). No subject with greater than one ZDV mutation had a virologic response to d4T. Seven of the 8 responders had only a K70R mutation at baseline. We conclude that in patients with prior ZDV treatment, those with only one ZDV mutation, particularly at position 70, can still get reasonable virologic activity from d4T. Those with more mutations are not likely to have much benefit.

Efavirenz- and adefovir dipivoxil-based salvage therapy in highly treatment-experienced patients: clinical and genotypic predictors of virologic response.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of prior nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) therapy, genotypic resistance, and other variables on response to efavirenz (EFV)- and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV)-based salvage therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. SETTING: One university and one community-based HIV clinic. STUDY SUBJECTS: All 33 patients who were coenrolled in both the EFV and ADV expanded access programs. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received EFV 600 mg/day and ADV 120 mg/day in addition to other antiretroviral agents. OUTCOME MEASURE: HIV viral load (<500 copies/ml) at 12 and 24 weeks. RESULTS: 10 of 33 (30%) patients at 12 weeks and 8 of 33 (24%) patients at 24 weeks had viral loads <500 copies/ml. Prior NNRTI use and a history of any NNRTI-associated mutations predicted failure. Patients with Y181C or G190A single mutations had an initial greater magnitude of viral load suppression than those with K103N, but this advantage was short lived. No one with any NNRTI mutations responded with a viral load <500 copies/ml at 12 or 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: EFV/ADV-based salvage yielded viral load suppression at 24 weeks in 42% (8 of 19) of patients who were highly NRTI and protease inhibitor experienced but NNRTI naive. NNRTI-experienced study subjects had a poor response regardless of the specific NNRTI resistance mutation they harbored.