ABSTRACT
ELISAs for pesticides and herbicides in environmental and agricultural samples are becoming very important in screening applications [1-3]. Traditional chromatographic methods are expensive and results need long turnaround times, making them incompatible with rapid on-site decision making. ELISA methods have been shown to meet or exceed the performance of gas chromatography-they offer rapid low-cost analysis, thereby increasing the frequency of sampling and enhancing data quality. Automated ELISA workstations allow the full benefit of these kits to be realized. Sample preparation, reagent pipetting, incubation, and photometric evaluation can be performed without user intervention. Reliability is increased through the elimination of operator error, better accuracy and precision, and often higher speed. Much larger batch sizes are possible and these systems can provide sample tracking with report generation for documentation requirements. In this paper the manual procedures and ELISA methods are compared and some critical aspects of automating these ELISA kits are discussed.
ABSTRACT
Using standard capillary electrophoretic and ion mobility methods, several electrospray interface designs were investigated for the capillary electrophoretic introduction of samples into the ion mobility spectrometer. Of the interfaces investigated, the flow assisted interface and the direct coupled interface showed the most promise. These preliminary experiments were encouraging. The ion mobility spectrometer coupled with a capillary electrophoretic introduction system operated with excellent separation efficiency and ion mobility reproducibility. Using tetrabutylammonium iodide, the number of theoretical plates for the spectrometer was calculated to be 3.10(3) and reduced mobilities were found to be reproducible with a relative standard deviation of 1.43%. Because of the desire to hold the spectrometer as hot as possible, the solvent would often vaporize in the interface, creating an unstable spray and inhomogeneities in the electrophoretic field. More work is needed to improve the spray process which contributed to the overall noise of the system and to eliminate the phenomenon of solvent vaporization which limited the reproducibility of electrophoretic migration times.
Subject(s)
Electrophoresis/methods , Spectrum Analysis/methods , IonsABSTRACT
Ion mobility spectrometry after electrospray nebulization and ionization was investigated as a method for the detection of components dissolved in liquids. While electrosprary operating conditions proved promising, greater sensitivity was achieved when the electric potential applied to the sample introduction needle was increased above breakdown potential and a corona discharge was established. Passing the liquid through the corona discharge established a "coronaspray" that efficiently nebulized and ionized the solvent and analytes. In this initial investigation of coronaspray ion mobility spectrometry (CIMS), ion current as a function of potential, temperature, and liquid flow rate was studied; several IMS spectra were obtained; and a continuous monitoring mode of operation was demonstrated. The results from this study indicated that CIMS has potential as a versatile and sensitive detection method for a variety of analytical procedures involving liquid flowing streams such as flow injection analysis, liquid chromatography, capillary zone electrophoresis, and field flow fractionation.
