Exploring dental students' attitudes toward patient-centered management of dental fear.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: A patient-centered care (PCC) paradigm undergirds modern dental education. PCC is particularly relevant in the management of patient dental fear. The aims of this study were three-fold: (a) to examine the preliminary psychometric properties of an author-designed survey administered to explore dental fear knowledge and perceptions, (b) to assess how 4th-year dental students regard dental fear, (c) and to investigate the relationship between students' knowledge and perceptions of dental fear and their clinical behavior. METHODS: In 2022, 4th-year dental students (N = 453) participated in a cross-sectional study. Participants completed a 16-item survey that assessed (a) knowledge and perceptions about dental fear, (b) common biases in patient fear assessment, and (c) patient management behaviors when fear is encountered. Exploratory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, and logistic regressions were run to address the study's aims. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors, with the two strongest factors pertaining to beliefs about the importance of dental fear (α = 0.87) and self-efficacy in managing fear (α = 0.74). Participants indicated that it is important to assess for dental fear and rated their self-efficacy in ability managing it as high. Ratings on both factors slightly increased the odds of engaging in routine patient screening for dental fear. Students also displayed assessment biases commonly seen among practicing dentists. CONCLUSION(S): Results indicate educational gaps within the current behavioral-science training for dental students. Changes to improve advanced dental students' appreciation of their patients' dental fear are warranted.

Formative research to address vaccine hesitancy in Tajikistan.

INTRODUCTION: Incomplete childhood vaccination is associated with caregiver vaccine hesitancy, conceptualized by "3 Cs": high complacency, low confidence, and low convenience. To expand on existing evidence drawn primarily from the Americas and Europe, and develop culturally appropriate interventions, this research explored drivers of vaccine hesitancy in the Central Asian country of Tajikistan. METHODS: In twelve diverse districts, clinic-based immunization record abstraction identified purposive samples of children who were up-to-date (N = 300) or not (N = 300) on all first year vaccines. Using a modified case-control design, the structured face-to-face in-home survey of 600 caregivers compared knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding childhood vaccination by up-to-date status. Socio-demographic and psychological factors associated with hesitancy were identified, using a 22-item vaccine hesitancy scale, with subscales measuring complacency, confidence, and convenience. Overall contribution of vaccine hesitancy to up-to-date status was modeled, adjusting for other significant covariates. RESULTS: Caregivers of not up-to-date children were more likely to report their child's health as poor, and report many logistical barriers to vaccination. Knowledge of vaccine-preventable illnesses was low, and complacency regarding vaccination was high among not up-to-date caregivers. In final multivariable models of predisposing, enabling and reinforcing influences on vaccination status, urban children, those with transportation and employed mothers were more likely to be up-to-date, while not up-to-date children included those born at home, seen as having fair or poor health, or reportedly told by clinicians to avoid immunization. Reinforcing factors included having a "vaccine passport", receiving useful information from medical providers, and believing that vaccine-preventable illnesses are serious and that most in their community are vaccinated. Additionally, vaccine hesitancy was negatively associated with up-to-date status (odds ratio 0.15, 95% C.I. 0.08, 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm that in this traditional culture, there is a strong need for tailored communication campaigns to address vaccine hesitancy, while continuing to address systems-level barriers.

From Salt to Stroke-Evaluation of a Media Campaign for Sodium Reduction in Philadelphia.

Excess dietary sodium contributes to the burden of chronic disease, including cardiovascular disease and stroke. Media-based health education campaigns are one strategy to raise awareness among populations at greater risk for stroke, including African Americans. During 2014-2015, the Philadelphia Department of Public Health conducted a health education campaign using radio, print news, and transit ads, to promote awareness of the link between dietary sodium, hypertension and stroke, and encourage reduced consumption of high sodium foods. Using a repeated cross-sectional design, street intercept surveys were conducted with ~400 Philadelphia residents representing the campaign's priority audience (African Americans ages 35-55) before and 6-13 weeks after the campaign, to evaluate both process (campaign exposure) and impact (recall of key health messages). Thirty percent of post-campaign respondents reported familiarity with one of the most engaging radio spots, and 17% provided accurate unaided recall of its key content, with greater recall among older respondents and frequent radio listeners. Forty-one percent of post-campaign respondents named stroke as a consequence of excess salt consumption, compared to only 17% of pre-campaign respondents, with greater awareness of the salt-stroke connection among those accurately recalling the radio spot from the campaign. Results suggest that priority populations for sodium reduction can be effectively reached through radio and transit campaigns. From a pragmatic perspective, street intercept surveys may offer one low resource strategy for evaluating public health education campaigns conducted by local health departments, especially among urban populations.

"We're Just Not Prepared for Eating Over Our Whole Life": A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Dietary Behaviors Among Longer Term Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: In many countries, there are growing numbers of persons living with a prior diagnosis of cancer, due to the aging population and more successful strategies for treatment. There is also growing evidence of the importance of healthful diet and weight management for survivorship, yet many long-term cancer survivors are not successfully following recommendations. METHODS: We explored this issue in a mixed methods study with 53 adult survivors of 3 cancers (breast, prostate, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma), living in Maryland. Participants provided three 24-hour dietary recalls, and results were used to classify respondents on 2 metrics of healthful eating (the Healthy Eating Index 2010, and a 9-item index based on current dietary recommendations). Recalls were also used to guide in-depth qualitative discussions with participants regarding self-assessment of dietary behaviors, healthful eating, and diet's importance in cancer prevention and survivorship. RESULTS: Survivors following a more healthful diet were more likely to be female, have greater socioeconomic resources, more years since diagnosis, normal weight, and no smoking history. Qualitative discussions revealed a more nuanced understanding of dietary strategies among healthful eaters, as well as the importance of household members in dietary decision making. DISCUSSION: Most survivors had received little nutrition counseling as part of their cancer care, highlighting the importance of holistic, household-oriented nutrition education for maintaining health among long-term cancer survivors.

Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Smoke-free Policy in Philadelphia Public Housing.

OBJECTIVES: Multi-unit housing environments remain significant sources of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, especially for vulnerable populations in subsidized housing. In Philadelphia, the largest US housing authority to implement smoke-free policies, we measured baseline resident smoking-related behaviors and attitudes, and longitudinal exposures to airborne nicotine, during policy development and implementation. METHODS: In 4 communities, we collected data in 2013, 2014, and 2016, before and after introduction of comprehensive smoke-free policies, interviewing persons in 172 households, and monitoring air-borne nicotine in non-smoking homes and public areas. Average nicotine level differences across years were estimated with multi-level models. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of respondents smoked. Only 37% of households were smoke-free, with another 41% restricting smoking by area or time of day. The number of locations with detectable nicotine did not differ before and after policy implementation, with approximately 20% of non-smoking homes and 70%-80% of public areas having detectable nicotine. However, public area nicotine levels were lower in 2016, after policy implementation, than in 2013 and 2014 (-0.19 µg/m3, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that initial policy implementation was associated with reduced SHS exposure in Philadelphia. As HUD strengthens smoke-free policies, SHS monitoring can be useful to educate stakeholders and build support for policy enforcement.