ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Haemorrhage is a leading cause of death in severe trauma. Fibrinogen plays a critical role in maintaining haemostasis in traumatic haemorrhage. Early fibrinogen replacement is recommended by several international trauma guidelines using either fibrinogen concentrate (FC) or cryoprecipitate (Cryo). There is limited evidence to support one product over the other with widespread geographic and institutional variation in practice. This pilot trial is the first randomised controlled trial comparing FC to Cryo in traumatic haemorrhage. METHODS/DESIGN: The Fibrinogen Early In Severe Trauma studY (FEISTY) is an exploratory, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing FC to Cryo for fibrinogen supplementation in traumatic haemorrhage. This trial will utilise thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) to guide and dose fibrinogen supplementation. The trial will recruit 100 trauma patients at four major trauma centres in Australia. Adult trauma patients with evidence of haemorrhage will be enrolled on arrival in the trauma unit and randomised to receiving fibrinogen supplementation with either FC or Cryo. The primary outcome is the differential time to fibrinogen supplementation. There are a number of predetermined secondary outcomes including: effects of the intervention on plasma fibrinogen levels, feasibility assessments and clinical outcomes including transfusion requirements and mortality. DISCUSSION: The optimal method for replacing fibrinogen in traumatic haemorrhage is fiercely debated. In this trial the feasibility and efficacy of fibrinogen supplementation using FC will be compared to Cryo. The results of this pilot study will facilitate the design of a larger trial with sufficient power to address patient-centred outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02745041 . Registered 4 May 2016.
Subject(s)
Factor VIII/administration & dosage , Fibrinogen/administration & dosage , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Hemostasis/drug effects , Hemostatic Techniques , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Wounds and Injuries/drug therapy , Blood Transfusion , Clinical Protocols , Factor VIII/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Fibrinogen/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/blood , Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Hemorrhage/mortality , Hemostatic Techniques/adverse effects , Hemostatic Techniques/mortality , Hemostatics/adverse effects , Humans , Pilot Projects , Queensland , Research Design , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wounds and Injuries/blood , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/mortalityABSTRACT
Haemorrhage in the setting of severe trauma is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is increasing awareness of the important role fibrinogen plays in traumatic haemorrhage. Fibrinogen levels fall precipitously in severe trauma and the resultant hypofibrinogenaemia is associated with poor outcomes. Hence, it has been postulated that early fibrinogen replacement in severe traumatic haemorrhage may improve outcomes, although, to date there is a paucity of high quality evidence to support this hypothesis. In addition there is controversy regarding the optimal method for fibrinogen supplementation. We review the current evidence regarding the role of fibrinogen in trauma, the rationale behind fibrinogen supplementation and discuss current research.
