Ordered subset expectation maximization and wide beam reconstruction "half-time" gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to "full-time" filtered backprojection.

OBJECTIVES: Compared to filtered back projection (FBP), OSEM with resolution recovery (OSEM-RR) and wide beam reconstruction (WBR)(UltraSPECT Ltd.), which resolve resolution and suppress noise simultaneously during reconstruction, have been shown to maintain/improve myocardial perfusion SPECT quality, even with low count density half-time acquisitions. We postulated that their characteristics would be advantageous for gated SPECT, where each frame is only 1/8th the count density of the summed perfusion images. METHODS: An 9 mCi rest/32 mCi (333/1184 MBq) stress Tc(99m) sestamibi protocol was used. 15-min FBP, and additional 7-min OSEM-RR and WBR post-stress 8-frame/cardiac cycle SPECT scans were acquired with 90 degrees -angled dual-headed detectors equipped with high resolution collimators in 156 patients. In 82 patients (48F, 34M) (123-252 lbs) with perfusion defects gated image quality was graded visually: 1 (poor)-5 (excellent) Regional LV wall motion (WM) was scored: 0 (normal)-4 (dyskinesis) in a total of 50 vascular territories with defects. Using Myometrix software (GE Healthcare), post-stress EDV, ESV, and EF were calculated for each method. Additionally, for purposes of comparison, the FBP gated tomograms were processed with other commercially available packages, Emory Toolbox and Cedars QGS. RESULTS: Despite half-time acquisitions, compared to FBP, image quality increased marginally with OSEM-RR (P = .09) but very significantly with WBR (P = 1.9 x 10(-21)). The WM score was greater only for WBR (P = 4.8 x 10(-8)). Although quantitative parameters correlated well with those determined by FBP (all EF r's > 0.85; all volume r's > 0.93), EFs were significantly lower (P = .0001 for OSEM-RR, 3.4 x 10(-14) for WBR), primarily due to a decrease in EDV with OSEM-RR (P = 7.3 x 10(-13)) and an increase in ESV with WBR (P = 9.2 x 10(-5)). However, inter-method differences in these parameters were of similar magnitude to differences encountered among the commercially available software methods. CONCLUSIONS: Half-time OSEM-RR and particularly WBR improve gated SPECT diagnostic quality compared to full-time FBP due to increased resolution and reduced noise. However, these attributes, which affect endocardial edge detection, result in a systematic offset in EDV, ESV, and EF.

Clinical results of a novel wide beam reconstruction method for shortening scan time of Tc-99m cardiac SPECT perfusion studies.

BACKGROUND: Newly developed reconstruction algorithms enable the acquisition of images at half of the scan time while maintaining image quality. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate a novel wide beam reconstruction (WBR) method developed by UltraSPECT for decreasing scan times and to compare it with filtered backprojection (FBP), which is the technique routinely used. METHODS AND RESULTS: Phantom and clinical studies were performed. Hot and cold sphere and cardiac phantom acquisitions were reconstructed via WBR, FBP, and ordered-subsets expectation maximization. Fifty patients were prospectively studied by use of both a standard and a short protocol. The short protocol was performed first on 29 of 50 patients via 8-frame gated technetium 99m stress single photon emission computed tomography and low-energy high-resolution collimators. Stress Tc-99m studies (30-45 mCi) were scanned for 20 seconds per frame. For the short protocol, all parameters remained constant except for the time per frame, which was reduced by 50% on Tc-99m studies. All resting Tc-99m scans (36/50 patients) were processed with FBP for the standard full-scan time studies and with WBR for the short scan studies. The images were interpreted by use of a 17-segment model and 5-degree severity score, and the perfusion and functional variables were determined. Distributions including mean, median, and interquartile ranges were examined for all variables. The differences (FBP - WBR) were computed for all variables and were examined by use of nonparametric signed rank tests to determine whether the median difference was 0. The absolute value of the difference was also examined. Spearman rank-order correlation, a nonparametric measure of association, was used for the 2 methods to determine significant correlations between variables. The hot and cold sphere phantom studies demonstrated that WBR had improved contrast recovery and slightly better background uniformity than did the ordered-subsets expectation maximization. The cardiac phantom studies performed with attenuating medium and background activity showed that the half-scan time images processed with WBR had better contrast recovery and background uniformity than did the full-scan time FBP reconstruction. In the clinical studies, highly significant correlations were observed between WBR and FBP for functional as well as perfusion variables (P < .0001). The summed stress score, summed rest scores, and summed difference score were not statistically different for FBP and WBR (P > .05). Left ventricular volumes had a high correlation coefficient but were significantly larger with FBP than with WBR. CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that cardiac single photon emission computed tomography perfusion studies may be performed with the WBR algorithm using half of the scan time without compromising qualitative or quantitative imaging results.